Bayesian Graph Local Extrema Convolution with Long-Tail Strategy for Misinformation Detection

IF 4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1145/3639408
Guixian Zhang, Shichao Zhang, Guan Yuan
{"title":"Bayesian Graph Local Extrema Convolution with Long-Tail Strategy for Misinformation Detection","authors":"Guixian Zhang, Shichao Zhang, Guan Yuan","doi":"10.1145/3639408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It has become a cardinal task to identify fake information (misinformation) on social media because it has significantly harmed the government and the public. There are many spam bots maliciously retweeting misinformation. This study proposes an efficient model for detecting misinformation with self-supervised contrastive learning. A <b>B</b>ayesian graph <b>L</b>ocal extrema <b>C</b>onvolution (BLC) is first proposed to aggregate node features in the graph structure. The BLC approach considers unreliable relationships and uncertainties in the propagation structure, and the differences between nodes and neighboring nodes are emphasized in the attributes. Then, a new long-tail strategy for matching long-tail users with the global social network is advocated to avoid over-concentration on high-degree nodes in graph neural networks. Finally, the proposed model is experimentally evaluated with two publicly Twitter datasets and demonstrates that the proposed long-tail strategy significantly improves the effectiveness of existing graph-based methods in terms of detecting misinformation. The robustness of BLC has also been examined on three graph datasets and demonstrates that it consistently outperforms traditional algorithms when perturbed by 15% of a dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":49249,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3639408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has become a cardinal task to identify fake information (misinformation) on social media because it has significantly harmed the government and the public. There are many spam bots maliciously retweeting misinformation. This study proposes an efficient model for detecting misinformation with self-supervised contrastive learning. A Bayesian graph Local extrema Convolution (BLC) is first proposed to aggregate node features in the graph structure. The BLC approach considers unreliable relationships and uncertainties in the propagation structure, and the differences between nodes and neighboring nodes are emphasized in the attributes. Then, a new long-tail strategy for matching long-tail users with the global social network is advocated to avoid over-concentration on high-degree nodes in graph neural networks. Finally, the proposed model is experimentally evaluated with two publicly Twitter datasets and demonstrates that the proposed long-tail strategy significantly improves the effectiveness of existing graph-based methods in terms of detecting misinformation. The robustness of BLC has also been examined on three graph datasets and demonstrates that it consistently outperforms traditional algorithms when perturbed by 15% of a dataset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对误报检测的贝叶斯图局部极值卷积与长尾策略
识别社交媒体上的虚假信息(错误信息)已成为一项重要任务,因为它已严重损害了政府和公众的利益。有许多垃圾机器人在恶意转发错误信息。本研究提出了一种利用自监督对比学习检测虚假信息的高效模型。首先提出了贝叶斯图局部极值卷积(BLC)来聚合图结构中的节点特征。BLC 方法考虑了传播结构中的不可靠关系和不确定性,并在属性中强调了节点与相邻节点之间的差异。然后,提倡一种新的长尾策略,用于将长尾用户与全局社交网络相匹配,以避免图神经网络过度集中于高度节点。最后,利用两个公开的 Twitter 数据集对所提出的模型进行了实验评估,结果表明所提出的长尾策略在检测错误信息方面显著提高了现有基于图的方法的有效性。我们还在三个图数据集上检验了 BLC 的鲁棒性,结果表明,当数据集受到 15% 的扰动时,BLC 的性能始终优于传统算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: TKDD welcomes papers on a full range of research in the knowledge discovery and analysis of diverse forms of data. Such subjects include, but are not limited to: scalable and effective algorithms for data mining and big data analysis, mining brain networks, mining data streams, mining multi-media data, mining high-dimensional data, mining text, Web, and semi-structured data, mining spatial and temporal data, data mining for community generation, social network analysis, and graph structured data, security and privacy issues in data mining, visual, interactive and online data mining, pre-processing and post-processing for data mining, robust and scalable statistical methods, data mining languages, foundations of data mining, KDD framework and process, and novel applications and infrastructures exploiting data mining technology including massively parallel processing and cloud computing platforms. TKDD encourages papers that explore the above subjects in the context of large distributed networks of computers, parallel or multiprocessing computers, or new data devices. TKDD also encourages papers that describe emerging data mining applications that cannot be satisfied by the current data mining technology.
期刊最新文献
Structural properties on scale-free tree network with an ultra-large diameter Learning Individual Treatment Effects under Heterogeneous Interference in Networks Deconfounding User Preference in Recommendation Systems through Implicit and Explicit Feedback Interdisciplinary Fairness in Imbalanced Research Proposal Topic Inference: A Hierarchical Transformer-based Method with Selective Interpolation A Compact Vulnerability Knowledge Graph for Risk Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1