Initial Investigation of a Grating Stimulus as a Visual Endpoint for Human Centrifuge Research.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Aerospace medicine and human performance Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.3357/AMHP.6246.2023
Joseph Britton, Desmond M Connolly, Danielle E Hawarden, Alec T Stevenson, Stephen D R Harridge, Nicholas D C Green, Ross D Pollock
{"title":"Initial Investigation of a Grating Stimulus as a Visual Endpoint for Human Centrifuge Research.","authors":"Joseph Britton, Desmond M Connolly, Danielle E Hawarden, Alec T Stevenson, Stephen D R Harridge, Nicholas D C Green, Ross D Pollock","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6246.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> G tolerance has been widely assessed using Peripheral Light Loss (PLL), but this approach has several limitations and may lack sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of a foveal visual endpoint for centrifuge research (Grating Loss; GL) and assess its repeatability, reliability, and usability with PLL as a reference.<b>METHODS:</b> A total of 11 subjects undertook centrifuge assessment. Gradual onset sessions (GOR; 0.1 G · s<sup>-1</sup>) measured both endpoints simultaneously and were performed twice, consisting of six determinations with anti-G suits activated (GOR-On) and six without (GOR-Off). Four determinations of each endpoint were also taken during rapid onset runs (ROR; 3 G · s<sup>-1</sup>). Usability was scored subjectively.<b>RESULTS:</b> The GL endpoint was reached 0.3-0.5 G<sub>z</sub> lower than PLL with each endpoint correlating strongly in GOR-Off (r = 0.93), GOR-On (r = 0.95), and ROR (r = 0.86). The GL had excellent test-retest repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient: GOR-Off/On = 0.99, ROR = 0.92) and low within-subject variability. Between-subject variance equaled PLL in all conditions. Subjective usability endpoint ratings were equal for all conditions.<b>DISCUSSION:</b> For the 11 individuals tested, the GL was a reliable, repeatable, and usable endpoint, with similar performance to PLL. GL may prove useful as a supplementary endpoint for human centrifuge research as a secondary data point or to reduce fatigue in repeated measurements. The foveal GL stimulus was lost before PLL, contrary to popular models of visual changes under +G<sub>z</sub>.<b>Britton J, Connolly DM, Hawarden DE, Stevenson AT, Harridge SDR, Green NDC, Pollock RD. <i>Initial investigation of a grating stimulus as a visual endpoint for human centrifuge research</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):894-901.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"94 12","pages":"894-901"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6246.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: G tolerance has been widely assessed using Peripheral Light Loss (PLL), but this approach has several limitations and may lack sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of a foveal visual endpoint for centrifuge research (Grating Loss; GL) and assess its repeatability, reliability, and usability with PLL as a reference.METHODS: A total of 11 subjects undertook centrifuge assessment. Gradual onset sessions (GOR; 0.1 G · s-1) measured both endpoints simultaneously and were performed twice, consisting of six determinations with anti-G suits activated (GOR-On) and six without (GOR-Off). Four determinations of each endpoint were also taken during rapid onset runs (ROR; 3 G · s-1). Usability was scored subjectively.RESULTS: The GL endpoint was reached 0.3-0.5 Gz lower than PLL with each endpoint correlating strongly in GOR-Off (r = 0.93), GOR-On (r = 0.95), and ROR (r = 0.86). The GL had excellent test-retest repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient: GOR-Off/On = 0.99, ROR = 0.92) and low within-subject variability. Between-subject variance equaled PLL in all conditions. Subjective usability endpoint ratings were equal for all conditions.DISCUSSION: For the 11 individuals tested, the GL was a reliable, repeatable, and usable endpoint, with similar performance to PLL. GL may prove useful as a supplementary endpoint for human centrifuge research as a secondary data point or to reduce fatigue in repeated measurements. The foveal GL stimulus was lost before PLL, contrary to popular models of visual changes under +Gz.Britton J, Connolly DM, Hawarden DE, Stevenson AT, Harridge SDR, Green NDC, Pollock RD. Initial investigation of a grating stimulus as a visual endpoint for human centrifuge research. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):894-901.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将光栅刺激作为人类离心机研究视觉终点的初步研究。
简介:G 耐受性已被广泛使用外周光损失(PLL)进行评估,但这种方法存在一些局限性,可能缺乏灵敏度。本研究的目的是调查在离心机研究中使用眼窝视觉终点(光栅损失;GL)的情况,并以 PLL 作为参考,评估其可重复性、可靠性和可用性。渐进起始环节(GOR;0.1 G - s-1)同时测量两个终点,并进行两次,包括六次激活抗 G 套装的测定(GOR-On)和六次不激活抗 G 套装的测定(GOR-Off)。在快速起跑(ROR;3 G - s-1)过程中也对每个终点进行了四次测定。结果:GL终点比PLL低0.3-0.5 Gz,每个终点在GOR-Off(r = 0.93)、GOR-On(r = 0.95)和ROR(r = 0.86)中都有很强的相关性。GL 具有极佳的测试重复性(类内相关系数:GOR-Off/On = 0.99,ROR = 0.92)和较低的受试者内变异性。在所有条件下,受试者之间的变异性与 PLL 相当。讨论:对于接受测试的 11 人来说,GL 是一个可靠、可重复和可用的终点,其性能与 PLL 相似。GL可能会被证明是人类离心机研究的辅助终点,可作为次要数据点或减少重复测量中的疲劳。与+Gz下视觉变化的流行模型相反,眼窝GL刺激在PLL之前就已消失。将光栅刺激作为人类离心机研究视觉终点的初步调查。Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2023; 94(12):894-901.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
期刊最新文献
Aeromedical Considerations for Patient Safety in Aesthetic Medical Tourism. Book Review. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Responses to Nonhypoxic Hypobaric Decompression. Embolic Ischemic Cortical Stroke in a Young Flight Instructor with a Small Patent Foramen Ovale. Evolution of Space Medicine at NASA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1