Physiological and Morphometric Differences in Resident Moderate-Altitude vs. Sea-Level Mice.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Aerospace medicine and human performance Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.3357/AMHP.6234.2023
Aedian E O'Connor, Dean M Hatzenbiler, Levi T Flom, Ana-Clara Bobadilla, Danielle R Bruns, Emily E Schmitt
{"title":"Physiological and Morphometric Differences in Resident Moderate-Altitude vs. Sea-Level Mice.","authors":"Aedian E O'Connor, Dean M Hatzenbiler, Levi T Flom, Ana-Clara Bobadilla, Danielle R Bruns, Emily E Schmitt","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6234.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> High-altitude [>2400 m (7874 ft)] acclimatization has been well studied with physiological adaptations like reductions in body weight and exercise capacity. However, despite the significance of moderate altitude [MA, 1524-2438 m (5000-8000 ft)], acclimatization at this elevation is not well described. We aimed to investigate differences in mice reared at MA compared to sea level (SL). We hypothesized that MA mice would be smaller and leaner and voluntarily run less than SL mice.<b>METHODS:</b> C57BL/6 mice reared for at least three generations in Laramie, WY [2194 m (7198 ft), MA], were compared to C57BL/6J mice from Bar Harbor, ME [20 m (66 ft), SL]. We quantified body composition and exercise outputs as well as cardiopulmonary morphometrics. Subsets of MA and SL mice were analyzed to determine differences in neuronal activation after exercise.<b>RESULTS:</b> When body weight was normalized to tibia length, SL animals weighed 1.30 g ⋅ mm<sup>-1</sup> while MA mice weighed 1.13 g · mm<sup>-1</sup>. Total fat % and trunk fat % were higher in MA mice with values of 41% and 39%, respectively, compared to SL mice with values of 28% and 26%, respectively. However, no differences were noted in leg fat %. MA animals had higher heart mass (119 mg) and lower lung mass (160 mg) compared to SL mice heart mass (100 mg) and lung mass (177 mg). MA mice engaged in about 40% less voluntary wheel-running activity than SL animals.<b>DISCUSSION:</b> Physiological differences are apparent between MA and SL mice, prompting a need to further understand larger scale implications of residence at moderate altitude.<b>O'Connor AE, Hatzenbiler DM, Flom LT, Bobadilla A-C, Bruns DR, Schmitt EE. <i>Physiological and morphometric differences in resident moderate-altitude vs. sea-level mice</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):887-893.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"94 12","pages":"887-893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10826331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6234.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High-altitude [>2400 m (7874 ft)] acclimatization has been well studied with physiological adaptations like reductions in body weight and exercise capacity. However, despite the significance of moderate altitude [MA, 1524-2438 m (5000-8000 ft)], acclimatization at this elevation is not well described. We aimed to investigate differences in mice reared at MA compared to sea level (SL). We hypothesized that MA mice would be smaller and leaner and voluntarily run less than SL mice.METHODS: C57BL/6 mice reared for at least three generations in Laramie, WY [2194 m (7198 ft), MA], were compared to C57BL/6J mice from Bar Harbor, ME [20 m (66 ft), SL]. We quantified body composition and exercise outputs as well as cardiopulmonary morphometrics. Subsets of MA and SL mice were analyzed to determine differences in neuronal activation after exercise.RESULTS: When body weight was normalized to tibia length, SL animals weighed 1.30 g ⋅ mm-1 while MA mice weighed 1.13 g · mm-1. Total fat % and trunk fat % were higher in MA mice with values of 41% and 39%, respectively, compared to SL mice with values of 28% and 26%, respectively. However, no differences were noted in leg fat %. MA animals had higher heart mass (119 mg) and lower lung mass (160 mg) compared to SL mice heart mass (100 mg) and lung mass (177 mg). MA mice engaged in about 40% less voluntary wheel-running activity than SL animals.DISCUSSION: Physiological differences are apparent between MA and SL mice, prompting a need to further understand larger scale implications of residence at moderate altitude.O'Connor AE, Hatzenbiler DM, Flom LT, Bobadilla A-C, Bruns DR, Schmitt EE. Physiological and morphometric differences in resident moderate-altitude vs. sea-level mice. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):887-893.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中纬度与海平面常驻小鼠的生理和形态差异
引言:高海拔[>2400 米(7874 英尺)]的适应性已经得到了很好的研究,其生理适应性包括体重和运动能力的降低。然而,尽管中等海拔[MA,1524-2438 米(5000-8000 英尺)]具有重要意义,但对这一海拔高度的适应性却没有很好的描述。我们的目的是研究在 MA 海拔饲养的小鼠与海平面(SL)饲养的小鼠之间的差异。方法:将在怀俄明州拉莱米[海拔 2194 米(7198 英尺),马萨诸塞州]饲养至少三代的 C57BL/6 小鼠与来自密歇根州巴港[海拔 20 米(66 英尺),密歇根州]的 C57BL/6J 小鼠进行比较。我们对小鼠的身体成分、运动输出量以及心肺形态计量学进行了量化。结果:当体重与胫骨长度标准化时,SL小鼠体重为1.30克-毫米-1,而MA小鼠体重为1.13克-毫米-1。MA小鼠的总脂肪率和躯干脂肪率较高,分别为41%和39%,而SL小鼠的总脂肪率和躯干脂肪率分别为28%和26%。但腿部脂肪率没有差异。与 SL 小鼠的心脏质量(100 毫克)和肺质量(177 毫克)相比,MA 小鼠的心脏质量(119 毫克)较高,肺质量(160 毫克)较低。讨论:MA 和 SL 小鼠之间的生理差异很明显,这促使人们需要进一步了解在中等海拔地区居住的更大规模影响。常驻中等海拔与海平面小鼠的生理和形态差异。Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2023; 94(12):887-893.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
期刊最新文献
Aeromedical Considerations for Patient Safety in Aesthetic Medical Tourism. Book Review. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Responses to Nonhypoxic Hypobaric Decompression. Embolic Ischemic Cortical Stroke in a Young Flight Instructor with a Small Patent Foramen Ovale. Evolution of Space Medicine at NASA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1