Cost-effectiveness of expanded latent TB infection testing and treatment: Lynn City, Massachusetts, USA.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5588/ijtld.22.0654
G R Beeler Asay, R Woodruff, D M Sanderson, C F Fisher, S M Marks, V D Green, A M Tibbs, A N Hill, H H Haptu, D McManus, R K Paradise, C Auguste-Nelson, J J Cochran
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of expanded latent TB infection testing and treatment: Lynn City, Massachusetts, USA.","authors":"G R Beeler Asay, R Woodruff, D M Sanderson, C F Fisher, S M Marks, V D Green, A M Tibbs, A N Hill, H H Haptu, D McManus, R K Paradise, C Auguste-Nelson, J J Cochran","doi":"10.5588/ijtld.22.0654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND:</b> Between October 2016 and March 2019, Lynn Community Health Center in Massachusetts implemented a targeted latent TB infection testing and treatment (TTT) program, increasing testing from a baseline of 1,200 patients tested to an average of 3,531 patients tested, or 9% of the population per year.<b>METHODS:</b> We compared pre-implementation TTT, represented by the first two quarters of implementation data, to TTT, represented by 12 quarters of data. Time, diagnostic, and laboratory resources were estimated using micro-costing. Other cost and testing data were obtained from the electronic health record, pharmaceutical claims, and published reimbursement rates. A Markov cohort model estimated future health outcomes and cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective in 2020 US dollars. Monte Carlo simulation generated 95% uncertainty intervals.<b>RESULTS:</b> The TTT program exhibited extended dominance over baseline pre-intervention testing and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$52,603 (US$22,008â-\"US$95,360). When compared to baseline pre-TTT testing, the TTT program averted an estimated additional 7.12 TB cases, 3.49 hospitalizations, and 0.16 deaths per lifetime cohort each year.<b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> TTT was more cost-effective than baseline pre-implementation testing. Lynn Community Health Centerâ-™s experience can help inform other clinics considering expanding latent TB infection testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14411,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.22.0654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Between October 2016 and March 2019, Lynn Community Health Center in Massachusetts implemented a targeted latent TB infection testing and treatment (TTT) program, increasing testing from a baseline of 1,200 patients tested to an average of 3,531 patients tested, or 9% of the population per year.METHODS: We compared pre-implementation TTT, represented by the first two quarters of implementation data, to TTT, represented by 12 quarters of data. Time, diagnostic, and laboratory resources were estimated using micro-costing. Other cost and testing data were obtained from the electronic health record, pharmaceutical claims, and published reimbursement rates. A Markov cohort model estimated future health outcomes and cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective in 2020 US dollars. Monte Carlo simulation generated 95% uncertainty intervals.RESULTS: The TTT program exhibited extended dominance over baseline pre-intervention testing and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$52,603 (US$22,008â-"US$95,360). When compared to baseline pre-TTT testing, the TTT program averted an estimated additional 7.12 TB cases, 3.49 hospitalizations, and 0.16 deaths per lifetime cohort each year.CONCLUSIONS: TTT was more cost-effective than baseline pre-implementation testing. Lynn Community Health Centerâ-™s experience can help inform other clinics considering expanding latent TB infection testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大潜伏肺结核感染检测和治疗的成本效益:美国马萨诸塞州林恩市。
背景:2016 年 10 月至 2019 年 3 月期间,马萨诸塞州林恩社区卫生中心实施了一项有针对性的潜伏肺结核感染检测和治疗(TTT)计划,检测人数从基线的 1200 名患者增加到平均每年检测 3531 名患者,即每年检测 9% 的人口。方法:我们比较了实施前 TTT(以前两个季度的实施数据为代表)和 TTT(以 12 个季度的数据为代表)。时间、诊断和实验室资源通过微观成本计算进行估算。其他费用和检测数据来自电子病历、药品报销单和公布的报销率。马尔可夫队列模型从社会角度估算了未来的健康结果和成本效益,单位为 2020 美元。结果:与基线干预前检测相比,TTT计划显示出更大的优势,其增量成本效益比(ICER)为52,603美元(22,008美元â-"95,360美元)。与 TTT 前的基线检测相比,TTT 计划估计每年可为每个终生队列额外避免 7.12 例肺结核病例、3.49 例住院治疗和 0.16 例死亡:TTT比实施前的基线检测更具成本效益。林恩社区卫生中心的经验有助于为其他考虑扩大潜伏肺结核感染检测范围的诊所提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
266
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease publishes articles on all aspects of lung health, including public health-related issues such as training programmes, cost-benefit analysis, legislation, epidemiology, intervention studies and health systems research. The IJTLD is dedicated to the continuing education of physicians and health personnel and the dissemination of information on tuberculosis and lung health world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Attrition in the treatment cascade among elderly patients with multidrug-resistant TB. The need for bold action to end TB in the Western Pacific Region. Borderline rifampicin mono-resistant TB treated with high-dose rifampicin. A diagnostic certainty score to support improvements in culture confirmation of TB. Risk factors for the isolation of Haemophilus influenzae in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1