Analytical performance of free testosterone calculated by direct immunoluminometric method compared with the Vermeulen equation: results from a clinical series.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1007/s42000-023-00522-x
Cristina Dalmiglio, Alessio Bombardieri, Elisa Mattii, Fausta Sestini, Carla Fioravanti, Maria Grazia Castagna, Marcello Fiorini, Francesco Dotta, Silvia Cantara
{"title":"Analytical performance of free testosterone calculated by direct immunoluminometric method compared with the Vermeulen equation: results from a clinical series.","authors":"Cristina Dalmiglio, Alessio Bombardieri, Elisa Mattii, Fausta Sestini, Carla Fioravanti, Maria Grazia Castagna, Marcello Fiorini, Francesco Dotta, Silvia Cantara","doi":"10.1007/s42000-023-00522-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Testosterone (T) is a hormone that is crucial for primary and secondary sexual development in both males and females. Free testosterone (FT) represents the biologically active form of T, and its measurement is of great importance in clinical practice. While application of either equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration is considered to be the gold standard for FT assessment, these methods are expensive and not widely accessible. As an alternative, the Vermeulen formula is a commonly utilized calculated method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical study, including 190 consecutive patients, was carried out to compare FT levels obtained through direct immunoluminometric assay and the Vermeulen formula. The comparison was performed using Passing-Bablok and Deming regression as well as the Bland-Altman plot. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated method employing the Vermeulen formula was considered the gold standard. Passing-Bablok regression indicated a good agreement between the two methods, with slopes close to 1 for the whole series. Although the Bland-Altman plot demonstrated overall agreement, a potential proportional bias was observed in females. Deming regression confirmed excellent agreement and reliable estimates. Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that the direct method had a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 93.4% in all patients. However, sensitivity improved to 81.0% in males and dropped to 18.2% in females likely due to the low number of true positive cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The direct method exhibited comparable performance to the calculated method, but caution should be exercised when interpreting results, particularly in females. Further studies are necessary to validate its sensitivity and specificity in larger series.</p>","PeriodicalId":50399,"journal":{"name":"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"313-319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-023-00522-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Testosterone (T) is a hormone that is crucial for primary and secondary sexual development in both males and females. Free testosterone (FT) represents the biologically active form of T, and its measurement is of great importance in clinical practice. While application of either equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration is considered to be the gold standard for FT assessment, these methods are expensive and not widely accessible. As an alternative, the Vermeulen formula is a commonly utilized calculated method.

Methods: This clinical study, including 190 consecutive patients, was carried out to compare FT levels obtained through direct immunoluminometric assay and the Vermeulen formula. The comparison was performed using Passing-Bablok and Deming regression as well as the Bland-Altman plot. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were assessed.

Results: The calculated method employing the Vermeulen formula was considered the gold standard. Passing-Bablok regression indicated a good agreement between the two methods, with slopes close to 1 for the whole series. Although the Bland-Altman plot demonstrated overall agreement, a potential proportional bias was observed in females. Deming regression confirmed excellent agreement and reliable estimates. Sensitivity and specificity analysis revealed that the direct method had a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 93.4% in all patients. However, sensitivity improved to 81.0% in males and dropped to 18.2% in females likely due to the low number of true positive cases.

Conclusion: The direct method exhibited comparable performance to the calculated method, but caution should be exercised when interpreting results, particularly in females. Further studies are necessary to validate its sensitivity and specificity in larger series.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用直接免疫光度法计算游离睾酮的分析性能与 Vermeulen 方程的比较:临床系列研究的结果。
简介睾酮(T)是一种激素,对男性和女性的初级和次级性发育至关重要。游离睾酮(FT)代表睾酮的生物活性形式,其测量在临床实践中具有重要意义。虽然平衡透析或超滤被认为是评估游离睾酮的黄金标准,但这些方法价格昂贵,而且并不普及。作为替代方法,Vermeulen 公式是一种常用的计算方法:这项临床研究包括 190 名连续患者,目的是比较通过直接免疫光度法和韦尔默伦公式得出的 FT 水平。比较采用了 Passing-Bablok 和 Deming 回归法以及 Bland-Altman 图。对灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值进行了评估:结果:采用维尔穆伦公式计算的方法被认为是金标准。Passing-Bablok 回归表明这两种方法之间的一致性很好,整个系列的斜率接近 1。虽然布兰-阿尔特曼图显示了总体上的一致性,但在女性中观察到了潜在的比例偏差。戴明回归证实了这两种方法具有极好的一致性和可靠的估计值。灵敏度和特异性分析表明,在所有患者中,直接法的灵敏度为 75.0%,特异性为 93.4%。然而,男性的灵敏度提高到 81.0%,女性则下降到 18.2%,这可能是由于真正的阳性病例较少:结论:直接法的性能与计算法相当,但在解释结果时应谨慎,尤其是女性患者。有必要开展进一步研究,在更大的系列中验证其灵敏度和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism is an international journal published quarterly with an international editorial board aiming at providing a forum covering all fields of endocrinology and metabolic disorders such as disruption of glucose homeostasis (diabetes mellitus), impaired homeostasis of plasma lipids (dyslipidemia), the disorder of bone metabolism (osteoporosis), disturbances of endocrine function and reproductive capacity of women and men. Hormones-International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism particularly encourages clinical, translational and basic science submissions in the areas of endocrine cancers, nutrition, obesity and metabolic disorders, quality of life of endocrine diseases, epidemiology of endocrine and metabolic disorders.
期刊最新文献
Molecular genetics of adrenal Cushing's syndrome, a Menelaos Batrinos Scholar's review, and the principle of gutta cavat lapidem in research. Challenges and pitfalls in the management of endocrine toxicities from immune checkpoint inhibitors: a case presentation of synchronous thyrotoxicosis and primary adrenal insufficiency in a melanoma patient. Reversibility of disturbed pituitary function in pediatric conditions with psychological stressors: implications for clinical practice. Animal studies on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and related polyagonists in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The causal impact of gut microbiota on circulating adipokine concentrations: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1