Polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a cohort of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 study

Pau Abrisqueta, Eva González-Barca, Carlos Panizo, José María Arguiñano Pérez, Fiona Miall, Mariana Bastos-Oreiro, Ana Triguero, Lalita Banerjee, Andrew McMillan, Erlene Seymour, Jamie Hirata, Jayson de Guzman, Sunil Sharma, Hyun Yong Jin, Lisa Musick, Catherine Diefenbach
{"title":"Polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a cohort of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 study","authors":"Pau Abrisqueta, Eva González-Barca, Carlos Panizo, José María Arguiñano Pérez, Fiona Miall, Mariana Bastos-Oreiro, Ana Triguero, Lalita Banerjee, Andrew McMillan, Erlene Seymour, Jamie Hirata, Jayson de Guzman, Sunil Sharma, Hyun Yong Jin, Lisa Musick, Catherine Diefenbach","doi":"10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00345-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3><p><span>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma comprises nearly 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases and patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation have few treatment options and poor prognoses. We aimed to determine whether the novel combination of </span>polatuzumab vedotin<span><span> in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide (Pola+R+Len) would provide a tolerable treatment option with enhanced antitumour response </span>in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.</span></p><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This completed phase 1b/2, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (GO29834) evaluated the safety and efficacy of Pola+R+Len in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at 19 sites in three countries (USA, Spain, and UK). Patients (≥18 years old) were eligible for inclusion if they had histologically documented CD20-positive relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology<span> Group performance status of 2 or lower, had received at least one previous line of chemoimmunotherapy, including an anti-CD20 agent, and were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. The dose-escalation phase (1b) used escalating doses of lenalidomide to find the recommended phase 2 dose. Patients received six 28-day cycles of induction treatment with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m</span></span><sup>2</sup> and intravenous polatuzumab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg (all cohorts) plus oral lenalidomide at the following doses: 10 mg (cohort A); 15 mg (cohort B); and 20 mg (cohort C). Rituximab and polatuzumab vedotin were administered on day 1 and lenalidomide on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle. During the dose-expansion phase (2), patients received six 28-day cycles of Pola+R+Len at the recommended phase 2 dose established during dose escalation. In both phases, patients with a complete response or partial response at the end of induction were eligible for post-induction therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup><span> on day 1 and lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary safety objective of the dose-escalation phase was identification of the maximum tolerated dose through incidence of dose-limiting toxic effects. The primary efficacy outcome of the dose-expansion phase was Independent Review Committee-assessed complete response rate at end of induction, based on PET-CT. Analyses were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, and the efficacy population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug at the recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with </span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"8px\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\" width=\"8px\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg>, number <span>NCT02600897</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"8px\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\" width=\"8px\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg>.</p><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between July 11, 2017 and Feb 3, 2020, 57 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years [IQR 60–75]; 38 [67%] were male and 19 (33%) were female; 47 [82%] were not Hispanic or Latino; and the median previous lines of therapy was 2 [IQR 1–3]). 18 participants were included in phase 1b and 39 were included in phase 2. Phase 1b confirmed a 20 mg recommended phase 2 dose for lenalidomide. After a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 4·7–25·8), the complete response rate, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee, was 31% (90% CI 20–43). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [61%] of 57) and thrombocytopenia (eight [14%] of 57). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (40%) of 57 patients and one patient died due to a treatment-related adverse event (neutropenic sepsis).</p><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Although the combination of Pola+R+Len did not meet the prespecified activity threshold, some patients derived clinical benefit and the regimen had a tolerable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.</p><h3>Funding</h3><p>Genentech/F Hoffmann-La Roche.</p>","PeriodicalId":501011,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Haematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00345-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma comprises nearly 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases and patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation have few treatment options and poor prognoses. We aimed to determine whether the novel combination of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide (Pola+R+Len) would provide a tolerable treatment option with enhanced antitumour response in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Methods

This completed phase 1b/2, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (GO29834) evaluated the safety and efficacy of Pola+R+Len in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at 19 sites in three countries (USA, Spain, and UK). Patients (≥18 years old) were eligible for inclusion if they had histologically documented CD20-positive relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, had received at least one previous line of chemoimmunotherapy, including an anti-CD20 agent, and were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. The dose-escalation phase (1b) used escalating doses of lenalidomide to find the recommended phase 2 dose. Patients received six 28-day cycles of induction treatment with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 and intravenous polatuzumab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg (all cohorts) plus oral lenalidomide at the following doses: 10 mg (cohort A); 15 mg (cohort B); and 20 mg (cohort C). Rituximab and polatuzumab vedotin were administered on day 1 and lenalidomide on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle. During the dose-expansion phase (2), patients received six 28-day cycles of Pola+R+Len at the recommended phase 2 dose established during dose escalation. In both phases, patients with a complete response or partial response at the end of induction were eligible for post-induction therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary safety objective of the dose-escalation phase was identification of the maximum tolerated dose through incidence of dose-limiting toxic effects. The primary efficacy outcome of the dose-expansion phase was Independent Review Committee-assessed complete response rate at end of induction, based on PET-CT. Analyses were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, and the efficacy population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug at the recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02600897.

Findings

Between July 11, 2017 and Feb 3, 2020, 57 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years [IQR 60–75]; 38 [67%] were male and 19 (33%) were female; 47 [82%] were not Hispanic or Latino; and the median previous lines of therapy was 2 [IQR 1–3]). 18 participants were included in phase 1b and 39 were included in phase 2. Phase 1b confirmed a 20 mg recommended phase 2 dose for lenalidomide. After a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 4·7–25·8), the complete response rate, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee, was 31% (90% CI 20–43). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [61%] of 57) and thrombocytopenia (eight [14%] of 57). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (40%) of 57 patients and one patient died due to a treatment-related adverse event (neutropenic sepsis).

Interpretation

Although the combination of Pola+R+Len did not meet the prespecified activity threshold, some patients derived clinical benefit and the regimen had a tolerable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Funding

Genentech/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波拉珠单抗韦多汀联合利妥昔单抗和来那度胺治疗复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者:一项多中心、单臂、1b/2期研究的队列研究
背景弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤占非霍奇金淋巴瘤病例的近30%,不符合干细胞移植条件的复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者治疗选择少且预后差。我们旨在确定波拉珠单抗韦多汀与利妥昔单抗和来那度胺(Pola+R+Len)的新型组合是否能为复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者提供一种可耐受的治疗选择,并增强抗肿瘤反应。方法这项已完成的1b/2期、开放标签、多中心、单臂研究(GO29834)评估了Pola+R+Len在复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中的安全性和疗效,该研究在三个国家(美国、西班牙和英国)的19个地点进行。组织学记录为CD20阳性的复发性或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者(≥18岁)、东部合作肿瘤学组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)表现状态为2级或2级以下、既往至少接受过一次化疗免疫疗法(包括抗CD20药物)且不符合干细胞移植条件的患者均可纳入研究。剂量递增阶段(1b)使用来那度胺的递增剂量,以找到第二阶段的推荐剂量。患者接受6个28天周期的诱导治疗,静脉注射利妥昔单抗375毫克/平方米和静脉注射泊拉珠单抗维多汀1-8毫克/千克(所有组别),外加口服来那度胺,剂量如下:10毫克(组别A);10毫克(组别B);10毫克(组别C);10毫克(组别D):10毫克(A组);15毫克(B组);20毫克(C组)。利妥昔单抗和泊拉珠单抗维多汀在每个28天周期的第1天给药,来那度胺在第1-21天给药。在剂量扩增阶段(2),患者按照剂量扩增期间确定的第2阶段推荐剂量接受6个28天周期的Pola+R+Len治疗。在这两个阶段中,诱导治疗结束时获得完全应答或部分应答的患者均有资格接受诱导后治疗,即在每个28天周期的第1天使用利妥昔单抗375毫克/平方米,第1-21天使用来那度胺10毫克/天,最多6个周期。剂量递增阶段的主要安全性目标是通过剂量限制性毒性反应的发生率确定最大耐受剂量。剂量扩增阶段的主要疗效结果是由独立审查委员会根据 PET-CT 评估的诱导结束时的完全反应率。分析在安全性人群和疗效人群中进行,安全性人群包括所有至少接受过一次任何研究药物治疗的患者,疗效人群包括所有至少接受过一次任何研究药物治疗且达到第二阶段推荐剂量的患者。本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02600897。研究结果2017 年 7 月 11 日至 2020 年 2 月 3 日期间,57 名患者入组(中位年龄 71 岁 [IQR 60-75];38 [67%] 为男性,19 (33%) 为女性;47 [82%] 不是西班牙裔或拉丁裔;既往治疗中位数为 2 [IQR 1-3])。第 1b 期纳入了 18 名参与者,第 2 期纳入了 39 名参与者。第1b期确认了来那度胺第2期的推荐剂量为20毫克。中位随访11-8个月(IQR 4-7-25-8)后,经独立评审委员会评估,完全应答率为31%(90% CI 20-43)。最常见的3-4级不良反应是中性粒细胞减少(57例中有35例[61%])和血小板减少(57例中有8例[14%])。57例患者中有23例(40%)报告了严重不良事件,1例患者因治疗相关不良事件(中性粒细胞败血症)死亡。虽然Pola+R+Len的组合未达到预设的活性阈值,但一些患者获得了临床获益,而且该方案在复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中具有可耐受的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Triplet therapy for advanced BCR::ABL1 positive myeloid leukaemias. Decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib for advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-arm, single-centre phase 2 trial. Efficacy and safety of fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (FREEDOM2): results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Ixazomib as consolidation and maintenance versus observation in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma eligible for salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (Myeloma XII [ACCoRD]): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Continued need for autologous transplantation in relapsed myeloma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1