Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) at 2 years following open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnad019
Morgan W Rice, Robert B Browning, Thomas W Fenn, Mario Hevesi, Shane J Nho
{"title":"Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) at 2 years following open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair","authors":"Morgan W Rice, Robert B Browning, Thomas W Fenn, Mario Hevesi, Shane J Nho","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnad019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To define Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) threshold scores after open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair. Primary open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair patients from November 2013 to March 2020 were identified. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed preoperatively, 1- and 2-year follow-up, including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain. Thresholds for achieving a MCID and PASS postoperatively were calculated using the distribution method and receiver operator curve analysis; 25 patients (24 females, 1 male, age: 69 ± 6.8 years, body mass index: 26.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2) were included in final analyses. MCID threshold scores for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were calculated as 11.1, 6.2, 15.3 and 14.0, respectively. PASS threshold scores for each of the PROs were as follows: HOS-ADL (71.9), mHHS (60.0), iHOT-12 (49.2) and VAS Pain (36.8). MCID thresholds for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were achieved by 58.3%, 83.3%, 66.7% and 57.1% of patients, respectively. PASS thresholds for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were achieved by 52.4%, 44.8%, 65% and 59.1% of patients, respectively. Open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair results in a high rate of achievement of clinically significant outcomes at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. MCID threshold values for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were 11.1, 6.2, 15.3 and 14.0, respectively. PASS threshold values for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were 71.9, 60.0, 49.2 and 36.8, respectively. The majority of patients achieved clinically significant outcomes with 81.3% and 77.3% achieving MCID and PASS for at least one PRO, respectively.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To define Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) threshold scores after open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair. Primary open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair patients from November 2013 to March 2020 were identified. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed preoperatively, 1- and 2-year follow-up, including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain. Thresholds for achieving a MCID and PASS postoperatively were calculated using the distribution method and receiver operator curve analysis; 25 patients (24 females, 1 male, age: 69 ± 6.8 years, body mass index: 26.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2) were included in final analyses. MCID threshold scores for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were calculated as 11.1, 6.2, 15.3 and 14.0, respectively. PASS threshold scores for each of the PROs were as follows: HOS-ADL (71.9), mHHS (60.0), iHOT-12 (49.2) and VAS Pain (36.8). MCID thresholds for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were achieved by 58.3%, 83.3%, 66.7% and 57.1% of patients, respectively. PASS thresholds for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were achieved by 52.4%, 44.8%, 65% and 59.1% of patients, respectively. Open gluteus medius and/or minimus repair results in a high rate of achievement of clinically significant outcomes at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. MCID threshold values for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were 11.1, 6.2, 15.3 and 14.0, respectively. PASS threshold values for HOS-ADL, mHHS, iHOT-12 and VAS Pain were 71.9, 60.0, 49.2 and 36.8, respectively. The majority of patients achieved clinically significant outcomes with 81.3% and 77.3% achieving MCID and PASS for at least one PRO, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定义开放式臀中肌和/或臀小肌修复术后 2 年的最小临床意义差异 (MCID) 和患者可接受症状状态 (PASS)
确定开放式臀中肌和/或臀小肌修复术后的最小临床意义差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值评分。确定了 2013 年 11 月至 2020 年 3 月期间的初次开放式臀中肌和/或臀小肌修复术患者。对患者报告的结果(PROs)进行了术前、1年和2年随访评估,包括髋关节结果评分日常生活活动(HOS-ADL)、改良哈里斯髋关节评分(mHHS)、国际髋关节结果工具-12(iHOT-12)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛。采用分布法和接收器运算曲线分析法计算了术后达到 MCID 和 PASS 的阈值;25 名患者(24 名女性,1 名男性,年龄:69 ± 6.8 岁,体重指数:26.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2)被纳入最终分析。经计算,HOS-ADL、mHHS、iHOT-12 和 VAS 疼痛的 MCID 临界值分别为 11.1、6.2、15.3 和 14.0。各 PRO 的 PASS 临界值得分如下:HOS-ADL (71.9)、mHHS (60.0)、iHOT-12 (49.2) 和 VAS 疼痛 (36.8)。分别有 58.3%、83.3%、66.7% 和 57.1% 的患者达到了 HOS-ADL、mHHS、iHOT-12 和 VAS 疼痛的 MCID 临界值。分别有 52.4%、44.8%、65% 和 59.1% 的患者达到了 HOS-ADL、mHHS、iHOT-12 和 VAS 疼痛的及格阈值。开放式臀中肌和/或臀小肌修复术可在术后至少两年内取得较高的临床显著疗效。HOS-ADL、mHHS、iHOT-12 和 VAS 疼痛的 MCID 临界值分别为 11.1、6.2、15.3 和 14.0。HOS-ADL、mHHS、iHOT-12 和 VAS 疼痛的 PASS 临界值分别为 71.9、60.0、49.2 和 36.8。大多数患者都取得了有临床意义的结果,分别有 81.3% 和 77.3% 的患者在至少一项 PRO 方面达到了 MCID 和 PASS 临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Levels of evidence. What the papers say. A growing role for Registry data to guide discussions with patients on their treatment options. What The Papers Say. Clinical and surgical factors influencing screw breakage during hardware removal following periacetabular osteotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1