{"title":"Corneal Tomography in a Commercially Available Optical Coherence Tomography Device and Comparison With a Rotating Scheimpflug Camera.","authors":"Piotr Kanclerz, Szymon Adam Radomski","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of corneal tomography obtained with an anterior-to-posterior segment optical coherence tomography device (Revo, Optopol Technologies Sp. z o.o.) and a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam AXL, Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In healthy subjects, agreement in stereometric parameters commonly used in cataract and refractive surgery was assessed. Comparison between the devices was performed using correlation coefficients, the Bland-Altman method, and a paired t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results of right eyes of 78 patients (47 women) aged 25.24±5.56 years were analyzed. The flat and steep anterior keratometry values were significantly higher for Revo than Pentacam (43.65±1.58 D vs. 42.99±1.47 D; P = 0.000, and 44.53±1.57 D vs. 43.82±1.49 D; P =0.000, respectively) and showed excellent correlation ( r =0.978 and 0.974, respectively). The results for maximal keratometry manifested a higher difference (45.89±1.69 D vs. 44.27±1.51 D for Revo and Pentacam, P =0.000) but were also strongly correlated ( r =0.871). Revo showed significantly lower corneal thickness values than Pentacam, both for apex pachymetry (535.54±32.45 vs. 550.74±31.55 μm; P =0.000) and for thinnest pachymetry (522.58±32.16 vs. 547.25±31.95 μm; P =0.000). The correlation coefficients for anterior and posterior corneal elevation at the thinnest point showed weak positive correlation ( r =0.179 and 0.185), while the correlation for corneal asphericity was moderate ( r =0.317).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant difference between keratometric values obtained with Revo and the Pentacam AXL, although the measurements showed excellent correlation. Similar results were found for corneal thickness measurements, but not for corneal surface elevation and corneal asphericity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"138-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcomes of corneal tomography obtained with an anterior-to-posterior segment optical coherence tomography device (Revo, Optopol Technologies Sp. z o.o.) and a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam AXL, Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany).
Methods: In healthy subjects, agreement in stereometric parameters commonly used in cataract and refractive surgery was assessed. Comparison between the devices was performed using correlation coefficients, the Bland-Altman method, and a paired t test.
Results: Results of right eyes of 78 patients (47 women) aged 25.24±5.56 years were analyzed. The flat and steep anterior keratometry values were significantly higher for Revo than Pentacam (43.65±1.58 D vs. 42.99±1.47 D; P = 0.000, and 44.53±1.57 D vs. 43.82±1.49 D; P =0.000, respectively) and showed excellent correlation ( r =0.978 and 0.974, respectively). The results for maximal keratometry manifested a higher difference (45.89±1.69 D vs. 44.27±1.51 D for Revo and Pentacam, P =0.000) but were also strongly correlated ( r =0.871). Revo showed significantly lower corneal thickness values than Pentacam, both for apex pachymetry (535.54±32.45 vs. 550.74±31.55 μm; P =0.000) and for thinnest pachymetry (522.58±32.16 vs. 547.25±31.95 μm; P =0.000). The correlation coefficients for anterior and posterior corneal elevation at the thinnest point showed weak positive correlation ( r =0.179 and 0.185), while the correlation for corneal asphericity was moderate ( r =0.317).
Conclusions: There was a significant difference between keratometric values obtained with Revo and the Pentacam AXL, although the measurements showed excellent correlation. Similar results were found for corneal thickness measurements, but not for corneal surface elevation and corneal asphericity.
目的比较使用前后节光学相干断层成像设备(Revo,Optopol Technologies Sp. z o.o.)和旋转式 Scheimpflug 摄像机(Pentacam AXL,Oculus Optikgeräte,德国韦茨拉尔)进行角膜断层成像的结果:方法:在健康受试者中,评估白内障和屈光手术中常用的立体测量参数的一致性。使用相关系数、Bland-Altman 法和配对 t 检验对不同设备进行比较:结果:分析了 78 名患者(47 名女性)的右眼结果,年龄为 25.24±5.56 岁。Revo的平直和陡峭前角膜测量值明显高于Pentacam(分别为43.65±1.58 D vs. 42.99±1.47 D;P=0.000和44.53±1.57 D vs. 43.82±1.49 D;P=0.000),并显示出很好的相关性(分别为r=0.978和0.974)。最大角膜度数的结果显示出更大的差异(Revo 和 Pentacam 分别为 45.89±1.69 D 和 44.27±1.51 D,P=0.000),但也有很强的相关性(r=0.871)。Revo 显示的角膜厚度值明显低于 Pentacam,无论是角膜顶点厚度测量值(535.54±32.45 vs. 550.74±31.55 μm;P=0.000)还是角膜最薄厚度测量值(522.58±32.16 vs. 547.25±31.95 μm;P=0.000)。最薄处角膜前后抬高的相关系数呈弱正相关(r=0.179 和 0.185),而角膜非球面度的相关系数呈中等相关(r=0.317):使用 Revo 和 Pentacam AXL 获得的角膜测量值之间存在明显差异,但两者的测量结果具有很好的相关性。角膜厚度测量结果与此相似,但角膜表面高程和角膜非球面度测量结果与此不同。
期刊介绍:
Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.