Integrating Frailty Assessment to Enhance Care in Cancer Patients with Borderline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.

Chih-Chung Hsu, Yu-Shin Hung, Shao-Ming Yu, Shun-Wen Hsueh, Wen-Chi Chou
{"title":"Integrating Frailty Assessment to Enhance Care in Cancer Patients with Borderline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.","authors":"Chih-Chung Hsu, Yu-Shin Hung, Shao-Ming Yu, Shun-Wen Hsueh, Wen-Chi Chou","doi":"10.1177/10499091231226062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The (ECOG) performance status (PS) is commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of patients undergoing antitumor therapy. An ECOG PS of 2, indicating patients capable of self-care but restricted strenuous activity, can complicate treatment decisions owing to concerns regarding treatment-related toxicity. We investigated whether frailty assessment could help discriminate treatment tolerance and survival outcomes in patients with an ECOG PS of 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively included 45 consecutive patients, aged ≥65 years, with an ECOG PS of 2, and newly diagnosed solid cancer scheduled for chemotherapy. Frailty was assessed using an eight-indicator geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) based on frailty status; secondary outcomes included treatment tolerance and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 73 years (range 65-94), and 71% had stage IV disease. Predominant frailty-related deficits were functional decline (96%), malnutrition (78%), and polypharmacy (51%). The median OS was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-18.4). Patients with 4-6 deficits had significantly lower OS than those with 1-3 deficits (9.9 months vs. 20.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% CI: 1.16-5.44, <i>P</i> = .020). Frailty significantly correlated with reduced 12-week chemotherapy competence (52% vs. 85%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] .14, 95% CI: .03-.70, <i>P</i> = .016) and enhanced risk of unexpected hospitalization (60% vs. 20%, adjusted OR 6.80, 95% CI: 1.64-28.1, <i>P</i> = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of patients with an ECOG PS of 2 and emphasize the importance of frailty assessment for treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231226062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The (ECOG) performance status (PS) is commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of patients undergoing antitumor therapy. An ECOG PS of 2, indicating patients capable of self-care but restricted strenuous activity, can complicate treatment decisions owing to concerns regarding treatment-related toxicity. We investigated whether frailty assessment could help discriminate treatment tolerance and survival outcomes in patients with an ECOG PS of 2.

Methods: We prospectively included 45 consecutive patients, aged ≥65 years, with an ECOG PS of 2, and newly diagnosed solid cancer scheduled for chemotherapy. Frailty was assessed using an eight-indicator geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) based on frailty status; secondary outcomes included treatment tolerance and toxicity.

Results: The median patient age was 73 years (range 65-94), and 71% had stage IV disease. Predominant frailty-related deficits were functional decline (96%), malnutrition (78%), and polypharmacy (51%). The median OS was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-18.4). Patients with 4-6 deficits had significantly lower OS than those with 1-3 deficits (9.9 months vs. 20.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% CI: 1.16-5.44, P = .020). Frailty significantly correlated with reduced 12-week chemotherapy competence (52% vs. 85%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] .14, 95% CI: .03-.70, P = .016) and enhanced risk of unexpected hospitalization (60% vs. 20%, adjusted OR 6.80, 95% CI: 1.64-28.1, P = .008).

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of patients with an ECOG PS of 2 and emphasize the importance of frailty assessment for treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合虚弱评估,加强对东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态处于边缘的癌症患者的护理。
背景:ECOG)表现状态(PS)通常用于评估接受抗肿瘤治疗的患者的功能能力。ECOG PS 为 2 表示患者有自理能力,但剧烈活动受限,这可能会使治疗决策复杂化,因为人们担心治疗相关毒性。我们研究了虚弱程度评估是否有助于区分 ECOG PS 为 2 的患者的治疗耐受性和生存结果:我们前瞻性地纳入了 45 名年龄≥65 岁、ECOG PS 为 2、新诊断为实体瘤并计划接受化疗的连续患者。采用老年医学八项指标评估虚弱程度。主要结果是基于虚弱状态的总生存期(OS);次要结果包括治疗耐受性和毒性:患者年龄中位数为 73 岁(65-94 岁不等),71% 的患者处于 IV 期。与虚弱相关的主要缺陷是功能衰退(96%)、营养不良(78%)和多药治疗(51%)。中位生存期为 12.6 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI]:6.8-18.4)。有 4-6 项缺陷的患者的 OS 明显低于有 1-3 项缺陷的患者(9.9 个月 vs. 20.0 个月,调整后危险比 2.51,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.16-5.44,P = .020)。体弱与12周化疗能力下降(52% vs. 85%,调整后比值比 [OR] .14,95% CI:.03-.70,P = .016)和意外住院风险增加(60% vs. 20%,调整后比值比 6.80,95% CI:1.64-28.1,P = .008)明显相关:我们的研究结果突出了 ECOG PS 为 2 的患者的多面性,强调了虚弱评估对治疗结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symptoms and Prognoses of Patients With Breast Cancer and Malignant Wounds in Palliative Care Units: The Multicenter, Prospective, Observational EASED Study. Development and Validation of the Home Hospice Care Needs Questionnaire for the Dying Old Adult (HHCNQ-DE) in Mainland China. Long-Term Impact of the End-of-Life Care Nursing Education Consortium on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice (KAP) of Indian Nurses Working in Non-Palliative Care Settings: A KAP-GAP Analysis. The Perspective of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care on Unmet Needs: A Qualitative Synthesis Using Meta-Ethnography. Caring for Patients Requiring Venous Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Can Upstream Palliative Care Make a Difference?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1