Integrating Frailty Assessment to Enhance Care in Cancer Patients with Borderline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.

IF 1.4 The American journal of hospice & palliative care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1177/10499091231226062
Chih-Chung Hsu, Yu-Shin Hung, Shao-Ming Yu, Shun-Wen Hsueh, Wen-Chi Chou
{"title":"Integrating Frailty Assessment to Enhance Care in Cancer Patients with Borderline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.","authors":"Chih-Chung Hsu, Yu-Shin Hung, Shao-Ming Yu, Shun-Wen Hsueh, Wen-Chi Chou","doi":"10.1177/10499091231226062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The (ECOG) performance status (PS) is commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of patients undergoing antitumor therapy. An ECOG PS of 2, indicating patients capable of self-care but restricted strenuous activity, can complicate treatment decisions owing to concerns regarding treatment-related toxicity. We investigated whether frailty assessment could help discriminate treatment tolerance and survival outcomes in patients with an ECOG PS of 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively included 45 consecutive patients, aged ≥65 years, with an ECOG PS of 2, and newly diagnosed solid cancer scheduled for chemotherapy. Frailty was assessed using an eight-indicator geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) based on frailty status; secondary outcomes included treatment tolerance and toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 73 years (range 65-94), and 71% had stage IV disease. Predominant frailty-related deficits were functional decline (96%), malnutrition (78%), and polypharmacy (51%). The median OS was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-18.4). Patients with 4-6 deficits had significantly lower OS than those with 1-3 deficits (9.9 months vs. 20.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% CI: 1.16-5.44, <i>P</i> = .020). Frailty significantly correlated with reduced 12-week chemotherapy competence (52% vs. 85%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] .14, 95% CI: .03-.70, <i>P</i> = .016) and enhanced risk of unexpected hospitalization (60% vs. 20%, adjusted OR 6.80, 95% CI: 1.64-28.1, <i>P</i> = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of patients with an ECOG PS of 2 and emphasize the importance of frailty assessment for treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"1272-1279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231226062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The (ECOG) performance status (PS) is commonly used to evaluate the functional ability of patients undergoing antitumor therapy. An ECOG PS of 2, indicating patients capable of self-care but restricted strenuous activity, can complicate treatment decisions owing to concerns regarding treatment-related toxicity. We investigated whether frailty assessment could help discriminate treatment tolerance and survival outcomes in patients with an ECOG PS of 2.

Methods: We prospectively included 45 consecutive patients, aged ≥65 years, with an ECOG PS of 2, and newly diagnosed solid cancer scheduled for chemotherapy. Frailty was assessed using an eight-indicator geriatric assessment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) based on frailty status; secondary outcomes included treatment tolerance and toxicity.

Results: The median patient age was 73 years (range 65-94), and 71% had stage IV disease. Predominant frailty-related deficits were functional decline (96%), malnutrition (78%), and polypharmacy (51%). The median OS was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-18.4). Patients with 4-6 deficits had significantly lower OS than those with 1-3 deficits (9.9 months vs. 20.0 months, adjusted hazard ratio 2.51, 95% CI: 1.16-5.44, P = .020). Frailty significantly correlated with reduced 12-week chemotherapy competence (52% vs. 85%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] .14, 95% CI: .03-.70, P = .016) and enhanced risk of unexpected hospitalization (60% vs. 20%, adjusted OR 6.80, 95% CI: 1.64-28.1, P = .008).

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the multifaceted nature of patients with an ECOG PS of 2 and emphasize the importance of frailty assessment for treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合虚弱评估,加强对东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态处于边缘的癌症患者的护理。
背景:ECOG)表现状态(PS)通常用于评估接受抗肿瘤治疗的患者的功能能力。ECOG PS 为 2 表示患者有自理能力,但剧烈活动受限,这可能会使治疗决策复杂化,因为人们担心治疗相关毒性。我们研究了虚弱程度评估是否有助于区分 ECOG PS 为 2 的患者的治疗耐受性和生存结果:我们前瞻性地纳入了 45 名年龄≥65 岁、ECOG PS 为 2、新诊断为实体瘤并计划接受化疗的连续患者。采用老年医学八项指标评估虚弱程度。主要结果是基于虚弱状态的总生存期(OS);次要结果包括治疗耐受性和毒性:患者年龄中位数为 73 岁(65-94 岁不等),71% 的患者处于 IV 期。与虚弱相关的主要缺陷是功能衰退(96%)、营养不良(78%)和多药治疗(51%)。中位生存期为 12.6 个月(95% 置信区间 [CI]:6.8-18.4)。有 4-6 项缺陷的患者的 OS 明显低于有 1-3 项缺陷的患者(9.9 个月 vs. 20.0 个月,调整后危险比 2.51,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.16-5.44,P = .020)。体弱与12周化疗能力下降(52% vs. 85%,调整后比值比 [OR] .14,95% CI:.03-.70,P = .016)和意外住院风险增加(60% vs. 20%,调整后比值比 6.80,95% CI:1.64-28.1,P = .008)明显相关:我们的研究结果突出了 ECOG PS 为 2 的患者的多面性,强调了虚弱评估对治疗结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of a Prayer Tree to Support the Emotional and Spiritual Needs of Visitors to Critical Care Units in the Deep South Region of the United States. Advance Care Planning Completion and Decision-Making Among Older Adults With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers: Findings From a Mixed Methods Study. The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Advance Care Planning and Healthcare Utilization in People With ALS. Factors Determining Home Death Among Older Adults in Thailand. The Perspectives of Older People With HIV (OPWH) on Advance Care Planning (ACP): A Qualitative Study in Primary Care Clinics in Kuala Lumpur.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1