COVID-19 Vaccination Telephone Outreach: A Primary Care Clinic Intervention Targeting Health Equity.

James F Wu, Martin D Muntz, Ann Maguire, Anna Beckius, Mandy Kastner, Brian Hilgeman
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccination Telephone Outreach: A Primary Care Clinic Intervention Targeting Health Equity.","authors":"James F Wu, Martin D Muntz, Ann Maguire, Anna Beckius, Mandy Kastner, Brian Hilgeman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Equitable COVID-19 vaccine access is essential to ending the COVID-19 pandemic. In many instances, COVID-19 vaccination notification and scheduling occurred through online patient portals, for which socially vulnerable populations have limited access. Our objective was to reduce disparities in COVID-19 vaccine access for the Black and socially vulnerable populations unintentionally excluded by our health system's patient portal-driven vaccine outreach through a telephone outreach initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 1, 2021, through April 27, 2021, telephone outreach was directed towards patients aged 65 and older without patient portal access at a large urban academic general internal medicine clinic. Univariate and multivariate analyses between those who did and did not receive telephone outreach were completed to assess the odds of vaccination, accounting for outreach status, sex, age, race/ethnicity, payor status, social vulnerability index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity count.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1466 patients aged 65 and older without active patient portals were eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Of these patients, 664 received outreach calls; 382 (57.5%) of them got vaccinated compared to 802 patients who did not receive outreach calls, of which 486 (60.6%) got vaccinated (<i>P</i> = 0.2341). Patients who received outreach calls versus those who did not were more likely to be female, younger, non-Hispanic Black, from high social vulnerability index census tracts, and have higher Elixhauser Comorbidity counts. Logistical analysis revealed an odds ratio (OR) with a nonstatistically significant trend favoring higher vaccination likelihood in the no outreach cohort with univariate analysis with no changes when adjustment was made for age, sex, race/ethnicity, payor, social vulnerability index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity count (univariate analysis: OR 0.88 [95% CI, 0.71-1.09]; model 1: OR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.72 - 1.10]; model 2 - 0.89 (0.72 - 1.11); model 3: OR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.70 -1.09)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While our telephone outreach initiative was not successful in increasing vaccination rates, lessons learned can help clinicians and health systems as they work to improve health equity. Achieving health equity requires a multifaceted approach engaging not only health systems but also public health and community systems to directly address the pervasive effects of structural racism perpetuating health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Equitable COVID-19 vaccine access is essential to ending the COVID-19 pandemic. In many instances, COVID-19 vaccination notification and scheduling occurred through online patient portals, for which socially vulnerable populations have limited access. Our objective was to reduce disparities in COVID-19 vaccine access for the Black and socially vulnerable populations unintentionally excluded by our health system's patient portal-driven vaccine outreach through a telephone outreach initiative.

Methods: From February 1, 2021, through April 27, 2021, telephone outreach was directed towards patients aged 65 and older without patient portal access at a large urban academic general internal medicine clinic. Univariate and multivariate analyses between those who did and did not receive telephone outreach were completed to assess the odds of vaccination, accounting for outreach status, sex, age, race/ethnicity, payor status, social vulnerability index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity count.

Results: A total of 1466 patients aged 65 and older without active patient portals were eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Of these patients, 664 received outreach calls; 382 (57.5%) of them got vaccinated compared to 802 patients who did not receive outreach calls, of which 486 (60.6%) got vaccinated (P = 0.2341). Patients who received outreach calls versus those who did not were more likely to be female, younger, non-Hispanic Black, from high social vulnerability index census tracts, and have higher Elixhauser Comorbidity counts. Logistical analysis revealed an odds ratio (OR) with a nonstatistically significant trend favoring higher vaccination likelihood in the no outreach cohort with univariate analysis with no changes when adjustment was made for age, sex, race/ethnicity, payor, social vulnerability index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity count (univariate analysis: OR 0.88 [95% CI, 0.71-1.09]; model 1: OR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.72 - 1.10]; model 2 - 0.89 (0.72 - 1.11); model 3: OR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.70 -1.09)].

Conclusions: While our telephone outreach initiative was not successful in increasing vaccination rates, lessons learned can help clinicians and health systems as they work to improve health equity. Achieving health equity requires a multifaceted approach engaging not only health systems but also public health and community systems to directly address the pervasive effects of structural racism perpetuating health inequities.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 疫苗接种电话推广:以健康公平为目标的初级保健诊所干预措施。
导言:公平获得 COVID-19 疫苗对于结束 COVID-19 大流行至关重要。在许多情况下,COVID-19 疫苗接种通知和安排是通过在线患者门户网站进行的,而社会弱势群体只能通过有限的途径接种。我们的目标是通过电话推广活动,减少因我们医疗系统的患者门户网站驱动的疫苗推广活动而被无意排除在外的黑人和社会弱势群体在获得 COVID-19 疫苗方面的差异:方法: 从 2021 年 2 月 1 日到 2021 年 4 月 27 日,在一家大型城市学术性综合内科诊所,针对 65 岁及以上且无法访问患者门户网站的患者开展了电话推广活动。对接受和未接受电话外展服务的患者进行单变量和多变量分析,以评估接种疫苗的几率,同时考虑外展服务状况、性别、年龄、种族/民族、付款人状况、社会脆弱性指数和埃利克豪斯合并症计数:共有 1466 名 65 岁及以上且没有活跃患者门户的患者符合接种 COVID-19 疫苗的条件。在这些患者中,有 664 人接到了外展电话;其中 382 人(57.5%)接种了疫苗,而未接到外展电话的患者有 802 人,其中 486 人(60.6%)接种了疫苗(P = 0.2341)。接到外展电话的患者与未接到外展电话的患者相比,女性、年轻、非西班牙裔黑人、来自社会脆弱指数较高的人口普查区以及埃利克豪斯合并症计数较高的可能性更大。逻辑分析表明,在对年龄、性别、种族/民族、付款人、社会弱势指数和 Elixhauser 合并症计数进行调整后,单变量分析显示出的几率比(OR)具有非统计学意义的趋势,即不进行外联的队列中接种疫苗的可能性更高(单变量分析:OR 0.88 [95% C]):OR:0.88 [95% CI,0.71-1.09];模型 1:OR 0.89 [95% CI,0.72-1.10];模型 2 - 0.89 (0.72 - 1.11);模型 3:OR 0.87 (95% CI,0.70-1.09)]:虽然我们的电话外展活动未能成功提高疫苗接种率,但所学到的经验可以帮助临床医生和医疗系统努力提高健康公平性。要实现健康公平,不仅需要卫生系统的参与,还需要公共卫生和社区系统的参与,以直接解决造成健康不公平的结构性种族主义的普遍影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STRN-ALK Fusion in Advanced Salivary Gland Carcinoma With Response to Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition: Case Report and Literature Review. Community Agency Preferences for and Perceptions of Disseminating and Implementing a Continence Promotion Program. Delta-8 Tetrahydrocannabinol in the Emergency Department: A Case Series. Driving in Cars with Viral Transport Medium. Experience as IMGs Applying for US Clinical Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1