Implementing the European code of cancer practice in rural settings

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100465
David Nelson , Peter Selby , Ros Kane , Ava Harding-Bell , Amanda Kenny , Kathie McPeake , Samuel Cooke , Todd Hogue , Kathy Oliver , Mark Gussy , Mark Lawler
{"title":"Implementing the European code of cancer practice in rural settings","authors":"David Nelson ,&nbsp;Peter Selby ,&nbsp;Ros Kane ,&nbsp;Ava Harding-Bell ,&nbsp;Amanda Kenny ,&nbsp;Kathie McPeake ,&nbsp;Samuel Cooke ,&nbsp;Todd Hogue ,&nbsp;Kathy Oliver ,&nbsp;Mark Gussy ,&nbsp;Mark Lawler","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing evidence often indicates higher cancer incidence and mortality rates, later diagnosis, lower screening uptake and poorer long-term survival for people living in rural compared to more urbanised areas. Despite wide inequities and variation in cancer care and outcomes across Europe, much of the scientific literature explicitly exploring the impact of rurality on cancer continues to come from Australia and North America<strong>.</strong> The European Code of Cancer Practice or “The Code” is a citizen and patient-centred statement of the most salient requirements for good clinical cancer practice and has been extensively co-produced by cancer patients, cancer professionals and patient advocates. It contains 10 key overarching Rights that a cancer patient should expect from their healthcare system, regardless of where they live and has been strongly endorsed by professional and patient cancer organisations as well as the European Commission. In this article, we use these 10 fundamental Rights as a framework to argue that (i) the issues and needs identified in The Code are generally more profound for rural people with cancer; (ii) addressing these issues is also more challenging in rural contexts; (iii) interventions and support must explicitly account for the unique needs of rural residents living with and affected by cancer and (iv) new innovative approaches are urgently required to successfully overcome the challenges faced by rural people with cancer and their caregivers. Despite equitable healthcare being a key European policy focus, the needs of rural people living with cancer have largely been neglected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000826/pdfft?md5=041eb7a84e9498cb5febb9240951844f&pid=1-s2.0-S2213538323000826-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing evidence often indicates higher cancer incidence and mortality rates, later diagnosis, lower screening uptake and poorer long-term survival for people living in rural compared to more urbanised areas. Despite wide inequities and variation in cancer care and outcomes across Europe, much of the scientific literature explicitly exploring the impact of rurality on cancer continues to come from Australia and North America. The European Code of Cancer Practice or “The Code” is a citizen and patient-centred statement of the most salient requirements for good clinical cancer practice and has been extensively co-produced by cancer patients, cancer professionals and patient advocates. It contains 10 key overarching Rights that a cancer patient should expect from their healthcare system, regardless of where they live and has been strongly endorsed by professional and patient cancer organisations as well as the European Commission. In this article, we use these 10 fundamental Rights as a framework to argue that (i) the issues and needs identified in The Code are generally more profound for rural people with cancer; (ii) addressing these issues is also more challenging in rural contexts; (iii) interventions and support must explicitly account for the unique needs of rural residents living with and affected by cancer and (iv) new innovative approaches are urgently required to successfully overcome the challenges faced by rural people with cancer and their caregivers. Despite equitable healthcare being a key European policy focus, the needs of rural people living with cancer have largely been neglected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在农村地区实施《欧洲癌症治疗规范》。
现有证据通常表明,与城市化程度较高的地区相比,生活在农村地区的人癌症发病率和死亡率较高,确诊时间较晚,接受筛查的人数较少,长期存活率较低。尽管整个欧洲在癌症治疗和结果方面存在广泛的不平等和差异,但明确探讨农村地区对癌症影响的大部分科学文献仍然来自澳大利亚和北美。欧洲癌症治疗规范》或 "规范 "是一份以公民和患者为中心的声明,阐述了良好的癌症临床实践的最突出要求,并由癌症患者、癌症专业人士和患者权益倡导者广泛共同制定。它包含癌症患者应从医疗保健系统中享有的 10 项主要权利,无论他们生活在哪里,并得到了癌症专业组织和患者组织以及欧盟委员会的大力支持。在本文中,我们以这 10 项基本权利为框架,论证:(i) 《准则》中指出的问题和需求对于农村癌症患者而言通常更为深刻;(ii) 在农村环境中解决这些问题也更具挑战性;(iii) 干预和支持措施必须明确考虑到农村癌症患者及其护理人员的独特需求;(iv) 迫切需要新的创新方法来成功克服农村癌症患者及其护理人员所面临的挑战。尽管公平医疗保健是欧洲政策的重点,但农村癌症患者的需求在很大程度上被忽视了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Rapid diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer: A realist synthesis. Time in the U.S. and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among Diverse Immigrants. Overcoming barriers of cervical cancer elimination in India: A practice to policy level advocacy. Precision oncology implementation in a regional-based health care system: A professional consensus to define the pathway Analysis of 810 tweets from 25 unofficial ASCO representatives (Featured Voices) at ASCO 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1