Evaluation of 2D ion chamber arrays for patient specific quality assurance using a static phantom at a 0.35 T MR-Linac.

C K Renkamp, D Eulenstein, M Sebald, F Schlüter, C Buchele, C Rippke, J Debus, S Klüter
{"title":"Evaluation of 2D ion chamber arrays for patient specific quality assurance using a static phantom at a 0.35 T MR-Linac.","authors":"C K Renkamp, D Eulenstein, M Sebald, F Schlüter, C Buchele, C Rippke, J Debus, S Klüter","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient specific quality assurance (QA) in MR-Linacs can be performed with MR-compatible ion chamber arrays. However, the presence of a static magnetic field can alter the angular response of such arrays substantially. This works investigates the suitability of two ion chamber arrays, an air-filled and a liquid-filled array, for patient specific QA at a 0.35 T MR-Linac using a static phantom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to study the angular response, the two arrays were placed in a static, solid phantom and irradiated with 9.96 × 9.96 cm<sup>2</sup> fields every 10° beam angle at a 0.35 T MR-Linac. Measurements were compared to the TPS calculated dose in terms of gamma passing rate and relative dose to the central chamber. 20 patient specific quality assurance plans were measured using the liquid-filled array.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The air-filled array showed asymmetric angular response changes of central chamber dose of up to 18% and down to local 3 mm / 3% gamma rates of 20%, while only minor differences within 3% (excluding parallel irradiation and beams through the couch edges) were found for the liquid-filled ion chamber array without rotating the phantom. Patient plan QA using the liquid-filled array yielded a median local 3 mm / 3% 3D gamma passing rate of 99.8% (range 96.9%-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A liquid-filled ionization chamber array in combination with a static phantom can be used for efficient patient specific plan QA in a single measurement set-up in a 0.35 T MR-Linac, while the air-filled ion chamber array phantom shows large angular response changes and has its limitations regarding patient specific QA measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.12.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient specific quality assurance (QA) in MR-Linacs can be performed with MR-compatible ion chamber arrays. However, the presence of a static magnetic field can alter the angular response of such arrays substantially. This works investigates the suitability of two ion chamber arrays, an air-filled and a liquid-filled array, for patient specific QA at a 0.35 T MR-Linac using a static phantom.

Methods: In order to study the angular response, the two arrays were placed in a static, solid phantom and irradiated with 9.96 × 9.96 cm2 fields every 10° beam angle at a 0.35 T MR-Linac. Measurements were compared to the TPS calculated dose in terms of gamma passing rate and relative dose to the central chamber. 20 patient specific quality assurance plans were measured using the liquid-filled array.

Results: The air-filled array showed asymmetric angular response changes of central chamber dose of up to 18% and down to local 3 mm / 3% gamma rates of 20%, while only minor differences within 3% (excluding parallel irradiation and beams through the couch edges) were found for the liquid-filled ion chamber array without rotating the phantom. Patient plan QA using the liquid-filled array yielded a median local 3 mm / 3% 3D gamma passing rate of 99.8% (range 96.9%-100%).

Conclusion: A liquid-filled ionization chamber array in combination with a static phantom can be used for efficient patient specific plan QA in a single measurement set-up in a 0.35 T MR-Linac, while the air-filled ion chamber array phantom shows large angular response changes and has its limitations regarding patient specific QA measurements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 0.35 T MR-Linac 上使用静态模型对二维离子室阵列进行患者特定质量保证评估。
简介:MR-Linacs 中的患者特定质量保证(QA)可通过与 MR 兼容的离子室阵列来执行。然而,静态磁场的存在会大大改变此类阵列的角度响应。本研究利用静态模型研究了两种离子室阵列(充气和充液阵列)在 0.35 T MR-Linac 上进行患者特定 QA 的适用性:为了研究角度响应,将两个阵列置于静态实体模型中,在 0.35 T MR-Linac 上以每 10° 波束角照射 9.96 × 9.96 平方厘米的磁场。测量结果与 TPS 计算出的伽马通过率和中心腔相对剂量进行了比较。使用充液阵列测量了20个特定患者的质量保证计划:结果:充液阵列显示,中心腔剂量的不对称角度响应变化高达18%,局部3毫米/3%的伽马通过率为20%,而充液离子室阵列在不旋转模型的情况下,仅发现3%以内的微小差异(不包括平行照射和通过沙发边缘的光束)。使用充液阵列进行患者计划质量保证,局部 3 毫米/3%三维伽马通过率的中值为 99.8%(范围为 96.9%-100%):充满液体的电离室阵列与静态模型相结合,可在 0.35 T MR-Linac 的单一测量装置中高效地进行特定患者计划 QA,而充满空气的电离室阵列模型会出现较大的角度响应变化,在特定患者 QA 测量方面有其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of an MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning workflow using a commercial synthetic CT generator for brain and head & neck tumor patients. Impact of the corneal epithelium on the corneal power using 3D raytracing with OCT data. A noise-robust post-processing pipeline for accelerated phase-cycled 23Na Multi-Quantum Coherences MRI. Imaging dose and image quality of kilovoltage imaging implemented on a helical tomotherapy unit. Ultra-high-resolution brain MRI at 0.55T: bSTAR and its application to magnetization transfer ratio imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1