Military Vaccine Mandates: Thirty-Five Navy SEALs Believe Fighting for Religious Exemptions is A Shot Worth Taking

Madeleine Greene
{"title":"Military Vaccine Mandates: Thirty-Five Navy SEALs Believe Fighting for Religious Exemptions is A Shot Worth Taking","authors":"Madeleine Greene","doi":"10.1515/jbbbl-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Americans take great pride in their constitutional freedoms, especially the renowned First Amendment, which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (U.S. Const. amend. I) The free exercise of religion is safeguarded by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause; yet, in the face of a public health crisis – how far does this protection extend? Moreover, does the Free Exercise Clause cover all Americans equally? In 2020, the Corona virus (COVID-19) pandemic began testing the limits of the First Amendment. President Joseph Biden and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin mandated that all active and reserve military members take the newly developed COVID-19 vaccinations. Failing to comply would leave service members with no other option than to be dishonorably discharged from military service. This paper seeks to analyze the current case of thirty-five Navy SEALs who were denied religious exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccines, and examines the implications this has on First Amendment protections for military servicemembers.","PeriodicalId":415930,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety, and Biodefense Law","volume":"86 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety, and Biodefense Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbbbl-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Americans take great pride in their constitutional freedoms, especially the renowned First Amendment, which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (U.S. Const. amend. I) The free exercise of religion is safeguarded by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause; yet, in the face of a public health crisis – how far does this protection extend? Moreover, does the Free Exercise Clause cover all Americans equally? In 2020, the Corona virus (COVID-19) pandemic began testing the limits of the First Amendment. President Joseph Biden and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin mandated that all active and reserve military members take the newly developed COVID-19 vaccinations. Failing to comply would leave service members with no other option than to be dishonorably discharged from military service. This paper seeks to analyze the current case of thirty-five Navy SEALs who were denied religious exemptions from the COVID-19 vaccines, and examines the implications this has on First Amendment protections for military servicemembers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军方强制要求接种疫苗:35 名海豹突击队队员认为为宗教豁免而战值得一搏
摘要 美国人对自己的宪法自由深感自豪,尤其是著名的第一修正案,其中规定 "国会不得制定关于建立宗教或禁止自由信教的法律;不得剥夺言论或出版自由;不得剥夺人民和平集会和向政府请愿申冤的权利"(美国宪法第一修正案)。(美国宪法修正案一)宗教信仰自由受到第一修正案自由行使条款的保护;然而,面对公共卫生危机--这种保护能延伸多远?此外,自由行使条款是否平等地涵盖所有美国人?2020 年,科罗娜病毒(COVID-19)大流行开始考验第一修正案的限度。约瑟夫-拜登总统和国防部长劳埃德-奥斯汀规定,所有现役和预备役军人都必须接种新开发的COVID-19疫苗。不遵守规定的军人除了被不光彩地开除军籍外别无选择。本文试图分析当前 35 名海豹突击队成员被拒绝接种 COVID-19 疫苗的宗教豁免案例,并探讨这对第一修正案保护军人的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Urgent Need for a Carve Out Exception in the United Nations Security Council Veto Power Make Love Not War: The Possibility of Gaseous Hormones Against Civilians in Conflict Situations Threat of Biowarfare from Recent Genome Editing Advancements The Environment Can Save the Country: How Advancing Environmental Justice Can Improve Biosecurity International Humanitarian Law’s Impact on the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Weapon Guidance Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1