Differential gene expression of blood-based ABCA9, CNOT8, SESN1, UCP3, MAP2K1 and DDIT4 in Alzheimer’s disease

Q4 Neuroscience Neuroscience Research Notes Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i4.262
Ainon Zahariah Samsudin, K. Ramasamy, S. Lim, A. Chin, Maw Pin Tan, S. Kamaruzzaman, Baharudin Ibrahim, Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed
{"title":"Differential gene expression of blood-based ABCA9, CNOT8, SESN1, UCP3, MAP2K1 and DDIT4 in Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Ainon Zahariah Samsudin, K. Ramasamy, S. Lim, A. Chin, Maw Pin Tan, S. Kamaruzzaman, Baharudin Ibrahim, Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed","doi":"10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i4.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uncovered differential gene expression in blood to distinguish subjects with probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from normal elderly participants (non-demented controls, NDC). The participants were recruited via training (Phase 1) and validation cohorts (Phase 2). The changes of gene expression in blood samples from the training cohort (92 AD vs 92 NDC) were assessed using the microarray technology. The Partial Least Square Discrimination Analysis (PLSDA) was then used to develop a disease classifier algorithm (accuracy = 88.3%). Six differentially expressed genes  were validated through RT-qPCR using blood samples from the validation cohort [(25 AD, 25 NDC, 12 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 12 vascular dementia (VaD) subjects] . The PLSDA model indicated a good separation between AD and NDC [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) = 0.88]. ABCA9, CNOT8, SESN1, UCP3, MAP2K1 and DDIT4 were found to be differentially expressed between the two groups. Validation of the panel of six genes gave an overall accuracy of 82.0% (AUC=0.86). The ABCA9 mRNA level, which was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the AD group, correctly classified 90.9% of all subjects (AUC=0.94). This group of  genes may be responsible for dysregulation of pathways related to inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative injury, DNA damage, apoptosis and lipid metabolism. The disease classifier algorithm discriminated probable AD from MCI and VaD at specificity of 83.3% and 75.0%, respectively. These findings warrant further validation of potential blood-based biomarkers in larger samples of clinical AD.","PeriodicalId":36108,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research Notes","volume":"87 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i4.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uncovered differential gene expression in blood to distinguish subjects with probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from normal elderly participants (non-demented controls, NDC). The participants were recruited via training (Phase 1) and validation cohorts (Phase 2). The changes of gene expression in blood samples from the training cohort (92 AD vs 92 NDC) were assessed using the microarray technology. The Partial Least Square Discrimination Analysis (PLSDA) was then used to develop a disease classifier algorithm (accuracy = 88.3%). Six differentially expressed genes  were validated through RT-qPCR using blood samples from the validation cohort [(25 AD, 25 NDC, 12 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 12 vascular dementia (VaD) subjects] . The PLSDA model indicated a good separation between AD and NDC [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) = 0.88]. ABCA9, CNOT8, SESN1, UCP3, MAP2K1 and DDIT4 were found to be differentially expressed between the two groups. Validation of the panel of six genes gave an overall accuracy of 82.0% (AUC=0.86). The ABCA9 mRNA level, which was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the AD group, correctly classified 90.9% of all subjects (AUC=0.94). This group of  genes may be responsible for dysregulation of pathways related to inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative injury, DNA damage, apoptosis and lipid metabolism. The disease classifier algorithm discriminated probable AD from MCI and VaD at specificity of 83.3% and 75.0%, respectively. These findings warrant further validation of potential blood-based biomarkers in larger samples of clinical AD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默氏症患者血液中 ABCA9、CNOT8、SESN1、UCP3、MAP2K1 和 DDIT4 的基因表达差异
这项研究发现了血液中的不同基因表达,以区分可能患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的受试者和正常老年参与者(非痴呆对照组,NDC)。研究人员通过训练组(第一阶段)和验证组(第二阶段)招募。使用芯片技术评估了训练组(92 名 AD 与 92 名 NDC)血液样本中基因表达的变化。然后利用偏最小平方判别分析(PLSDA)开发了疾病分类算法(准确率 = 88.3%)。利用验证队列(25 名 AD 受试者、25 名 NDC 受试者、12 名轻度认知障碍(MCI)受试者和 12 名血管性痴呆(VaD)受试者)的血液样本,通过 RT-qPCR 验证了 6 个差异表达基因。PLSDA 模型表明,AD 和 NDC 之间有很好的分离[接收器操作特征曲线下面积 (ROC AUC) = 0.88]。研究发现,ABCA9、CNOT8、SESN1、UCP3、MAP2K1 和 DDIT4 在两组之间存在差异表达。对六组基因的验证结果显示,总体准确率为 82.0%(AUC=0.86)。AD 组的 ABCA9 mRNA 水平明显较低(p < 0.05),但却能正确分类 90.9% 的受试者(AUC=0.94)。这组基因可能对与炎症、线粒体功能障碍、氧化损伤、DNA损伤、细胞凋亡和脂质代谢相关的途径失调负责。疾病分类算法将可能的 AD 与 MCI 和 VaD 区分开来的特异性分别为 83.3% 和 75.0%。这些发现表明,有必要在更大的临床 AD 样本中进一步验证潜在的血液生物标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research Notes
Neuroscience Research Notes Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative retrospective analysis: exploring the quality of life of people with epilepsy in two cohorts Default mode network perturbations in Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI study in Klang Valley, Malaysia Gene expression analysis in plasma of patients with Alzheimer's disease Psychological science in Mongolia: Its history, development, and future prospects Neuroinflammation-induced neurodegeneration and associated microglia activation in Parkinson’s disease: a novel neurotherapeutic avenue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1