The effectiveness of Moodle's “Lesson” feature in pre-learning about arterial puncture and blood transfusion procedures

Haeyoung Lee, Sang-Shin Lee, Hyunyong Hwang
{"title":"The effectiveness of Moodle's “Lesson” feature in pre-learning about arterial puncture and blood transfusion procedures","authors":"Haeyoung Lee, Sang-Shin Lee, Hyunyong Hwang","doi":"10.7180/kmj.23.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Moodle’s “Lesson” feature as a pre-learning tool for clinical skills among medical students. Methods: The performance of 69 fourth-year medical students during practical sessions on arterial puncture and blood transfusion was assessed. These students engaged in pre-learning activities via Moodle's “Lesson” feature. We analyzed the survey results to gauge students’ satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the pre-learning approach. Additionally, we compared the performance of the 2023 cohort, which took part in the pre-learning process, with students from 2020 to 2022 who did not have this preparatory component.Results: Among the students surveyed, data from 59 respondents were analyzed. Satisfaction with the pre-learning segment was high, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.69 (standard deviation [SD]=0.62) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.918. The tool's perceived usefulness was also rated highly, with a mean score of 4.77 (SD=0.53) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.956. Students who used the pre-learning tool had a mean score of 84.20 (SD=14.74), whereas those who did not use the tool scored slightly lower, with a mean of 80.40 (SD=13.07); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). Nonetheless, the 2023 cohort scores were generally higher across the various percentile measures than those of the 2020–2022 groups.Conclusions: The pre-learning tool using the “Lesson” feature on Moodle proved useful and satisfactory for students learning clinical procedures. Further research with larger cohorts is required to validate these findings.","PeriodicalId":53015,"journal":{"name":"Kosin Medical Journal","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kosin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.23.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Moodle’s “Lesson” feature as a pre-learning tool for clinical skills among medical students. Methods: The performance of 69 fourth-year medical students during practical sessions on arterial puncture and blood transfusion was assessed. These students engaged in pre-learning activities via Moodle's “Lesson” feature. We analyzed the survey results to gauge students’ satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the pre-learning approach. Additionally, we compared the performance of the 2023 cohort, which took part in the pre-learning process, with students from 2020 to 2022 who did not have this preparatory component.Results: Among the students surveyed, data from 59 respondents were analyzed. Satisfaction with the pre-learning segment was high, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.69 (standard deviation [SD]=0.62) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.918. The tool's perceived usefulness was also rated highly, with a mean score of 4.77 (SD=0.53) and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.956. Students who used the pre-learning tool had a mean score of 84.20 (SD=14.74), whereas those who did not use the tool scored slightly lower, with a mean of 80.40 (SD=13.07); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). Nonetheless, the 2023 cohort scores were generally higher across the various percentile measures than those of the 2020–2022 groups.Conclusions: The pre-learning tool using the “Lesson” feature on Moodle proved useful and satisfactory for students learning clinical procedures. Further research with larger cohorts is required to validate these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moodle 的 "课程 "功能在动脉穿刺和输血程序预习中的有效性
研究背景本研究评估了 Moodle 的 "课程 "功能作为医学生临床技能预习工具的有效性。研究方法评估了 69 名四年级医学生在动脉穿刺和输血实践课程中的表现。这些学生通过 Moodle 的 "课程 "功能参与了预习活动。我们对调查结果进行了分析,以了解学生对预习方法的满意度和实用性。此外,我们还将参加预习过程的 2023 届学生的成绩与没有参加预习的 2020 至 2022 届学生的成绩进行了比较:在接受调查的学生中,我们对 59 名受访者的数据进行了分析。对预习环节的满意度很高,平均满意度为 4.69(标准差 [SD]= 0.62),Cronbach's alpha 为 0.918。该工具的有用性评价也很高,平均得分为 4.77(标准差=0.53),Cronbach's alpha 为 0.956。使用预习工具的学生平均得分为 84.20(标准差=14.74),而未使用该工具的学生得分略低,平均得分为 80.40(标准差=13.07);不过,这一差异在统计学上并不显著(P=0.196)。尽管如此,在各种百分位数测量中,2023 年组群的得分普遍高于 2020-2022 年组群:事实证明,使用 Moodle 上 "课程 "功能的预习工具对学生学习临床程序非常有用且令人满意。要验证这些发现,还需要对更大规模的学生进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
=?UTF-8?B?Q2Fwc3VsZSBlbmRvc2NvcHkgaW4gS2F6YWtoc3RhbjogYSBtdWx0aWNlbnRlciBjbGluaWNhbCBleHBlcmllbmNl?= =?UTF-8?B?RWZmZWN0aXZlIHByb3RvY29sIGZvciBjb250aW51b3VzIHBlcmljYXBzdWxhciBuZXJ2ZSBncm91cCBibG9jayBpbiBmZW11ciBmcmFjdHVyZSBwYXRpZW50cyB1bmRlcmdvaW5nIGhpcCBzdXJnZXJ5OiB0d28gY2FzZSByZXBvcnRz?= =?UTF-8?B?UHJlbGltaW5hcnkgZGF0YSBvbiBDb21wdXRlZCBUb21vZ3JhcGh5LWJhc2VkIHJhZGlvbWljcyBmb3IgcHJlZGljdGluZyBwcm9ncmFtbWVkIGRlYXRoIGxpZ2FuZCAxIGV4cHJlc3Npb24gaW4gdXJvdGhlbGlhbCBjYXJjaW5vbWE=?= =?UTF-8?B?Q2xpbmljYWwgZmVhdHVyZXMgb2YgY29yb25hdmlydXMgZGlzZWFzZSAyMDE5IGluIEtvcmVhbiBwZWRpYXRyaWMgcGF0aWVudHM6IGEgc2luZ2xlLWNlbnRlciByZXRyb3NwZWN0aXZlIHN0dWR5IA==?= =?UTF-8?B?SGVhdnktY2hhaW4gZGVwb3NpdGlvbiBkaXNlYXNlIGFzc29jaWF0ZWQgd2l0aCBtdWx0aXBsZSBteWVsb21hOiBhIGNhc2UgcmVwb3J0?=
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1