Hiu Ming Leung, Ming Him Yuen, Calvin Hoi Kwan Mak, Tak Lap Poon, Fung Ching Cheung, Helen Ka Yan Luk, Bryan Swee Haw Chee
{"title":"Efficacy test for intermittent theta burst stimulation during motor rehabilitation in patients post-stroke in a tertiary centre in Hong Kong","authors":"Hiu Ming Leung, Ming Him Yuen, Calvin Hoi Kwan Mak, Tak Lap Poon, Fung Ching Cheung, Helen Ka Yan Luk, Bryan Swee Haw Chee","doi":"10.1111/1744-1633.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Stroke represents a significant cause of long-term disability in adults. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method known for its potential to enhance motor recovery. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a standardised rTMS protocol initially utilised in patients with depression, has garnered attention in the realm of stroke rehabilitation. This study seeks to establish the efficacy profile of iTBS in motor rehabilitation for patients with subacute or chronic stroke.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study is a prospective cohort trial in which eligible patients with stroke were recruited into the iTBS group. Ten sessions of iTBS were conducted, followed by physiotherapy. An equal number of matched controls were recruited into the conventional physiotherapy group. The differences in various scoring systems related to motor performance at 6 months were analysed using independent two-sample <i>t</i> test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty patients were enrolled in the study. At 6 months, iTBS demonstrated a statistically significant improvement compared with conventional physiotherapy across various scoring systems, including motor power grading (47.4% vs 0%, <i>P</i> < .0001), Upper Extremity Fugl–Meyer Assessment (19.8% vs 0.7%, <i>P</i> < .0001), Box and Block Test (25.6% vs 1.7%, <i>P</i> = .007) and Barthel Index (17.8% vs 0.1%, <i>P</i> = .0002). No major adverse events were reported in the iTBS group at 6 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>iTBS resulted in significant improvement in motor performance across various domains at 6 months compared with conventional physiotherapy alone. This method proves to be a safe approach for motor rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51190,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Practice","volume":"28 2","pages":"82-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Stroke represents a significant cause of long-term disability in adults. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method known for its potential to enhance motor recovery. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a standardised rTMS protocol initially utilised in patients with depression, has garnered attention in the realm of stroke rehabilitation. This study seeks to establish the efficacy profile of iTBS in motor rehabilitation for patients with subacute or chronic stroke.
Patients and methods
This study is a prospective cohort trial in which eligible patients with stroke were recruited into the iTBS group. Ten sessions of iTBS were conducted, followed by physiotherapy. An equal number of matched controls were recruited into the conventional physiotherapy group. The differences in various scoring systems related to motor performance at 6 months were analysed using independent two-sample t test.
Results
Forty patients were enrolled in the study. At 6 months, iTBS demonstrated a statistically significant improvement compared with conventional physiotherapy across various scoring systems, including motor power grading (47.4% vs 0%, P < .0001), Upper Extremity Fugl–Meyer Assessment (19.8% vs 0.7%, P < .0001), Box and Block Test (25.6% vs 1.7%, P = .007) and Barthel Index (17.8% vs 0.1%, P = .0002). No major adverse events were reported in the iTBS group at 6 months.
Conclusion
iTBS resulted in significant improvement in motor performance across various domains at 6 months compared with conventional physiotherapy alone. This method proves to be a safe approach for motor rehabilitation.
中风是导致成年人长期残疾的主要原因。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种非侵入性的脑刺激方法,可促进运动康复。间歇θ脉冲刺激(iTBS)是一种标准模式的经颅磁刺激方案,最初用于抑郁症患者,在脑卒中康复中越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在确定 iTBS 对亚急性或慢性中风患者运动康复的疗效。符合条件的中风患者被纳入 iTBS 组。进行 10 次 iTBS 训练,然后进行物理治疗。常规物理治疗组招募相同数量的匹配对照组。通过独立双样本 t 检验分析 6 个月时与运动表现相关的各种评分系统的差异。与传统物理疗法相比,iTBS 在 6 个月时,在包括运动能力分级在内的各种评分系统方面均有显著改善(47.4% vs 0%,P<0.05)。4% vs 0%,p<0.0001)、上肢--Fugl-Meyer评估(UE-FMA)(19.8% vs 0.7%,p<0.0001)、方框和块测试(BBT)(25.6% vs 1.7%,p=0.007)、巴特尔指数(BI)(17.8% vs 0.1%,p=0.0002)。与传统物理治疗相比,iTBS治疗组在6个月后各领域的运动表现均有显著改善。这是一种安全的运动康复方法。本文受版权保护。
期刊介绍:
Surgical Practice is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal, which is dedicated to the art and science of advances in clinical practice and research in surgery. Surgical Practice publishes papers in all fields of surgery and surgery-related disciplines. It consists of sections of history, leading articles, reviews, original papers, discussion papers, education, case reports, short notes on surgical techniques and letters to the Editor.