Experiences of students and educators with simulated placements in allied health profession and nursing education: a qualitative systematic review

Karen Stevens, Kirti Sathe, Christina Mathew, S. McLean
{"title":"Experiences of students and educators with simulated placements in allied health profession and nursing education: a qualitative systematic review","authors":"Karen Stevens, Kirti Sathe, Christina Mathew, S. McLean","doi":"10.54531/ftwz5026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reduced clinical placement capacity, the COVID-19 pandemic and growing training place numbers have resulted in the development of innovative placement design in healthcare education. Simulation is widely used in healthcare education; however, its use as a placement model is in its infancy. The experiences and perceptions of students and educators are important to shape simulated placements moving forward. A systematic search of the literature was conducted on eight databases to identify qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring the experiences of students or educators in the nursing and allied health professions. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. A meta-aggregative approach, in accordance with JBI guidelines for reviews of qualitative evidence, was used to synthesize the results. From the eight studies, a total of 69 findings were extracted. These were grouped into nine categories to form three synthesized findings of overall low quality. These findings were related to (1) reality of the simulated placement, (2) emotions evoked during the simulated placement, and (3) opportunities and challenges associated with implementing simulated placements. Simulated placements were considered a useful tool for the enhancement of communication skills, clinical reasoning skills, new knowledge generation, enhancing reflection and for preparation for clinical practice by students as well as educators.","PeriodicalId":506634,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/ftwz5026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reduced clinical placement capacity, the COVID-19 pandemic and growing training place numbers have resulted in the development of innovative placement design in healthcare education. Simulation is widely used in healthcare education; however, its use as a placement model is in its infancy. The experiences and perceptions of students and educators are important to shape simulated placements moving forward. A systematic search of the literature was conducted on eight databases to identify qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring the experiences of students or educators in the nursing and allied health professions. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. A meta-aggregative approach, in accordance with JBI guidelines for reviews of qualitative evidence, was used to synthesize the results. From the eight studies, a total of 69 findings were extracted. These were grouped into nine categories to form three synthesized findings of overall low quality. These findings were related to (1) reality of the simulated placement, (2) emotions evoked during the simulated placement, and (3) opportunities and challenges associated with implementing simulated placements. Simulated placements were considered a useful tool for the enhancement of communication skills, clinical reasoning skills, new knowledge generation, enhancing reflection and for preparation for clinical practice by students as well as educators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生和教育工作者在专职医疗和护理教育中模拟实习的经验:定性系统审查
临床实习容量的减少、COVID-19 大流行以及培训名额的不断增加,促使医疗保健教育领域开发出创新的实习设计。模拟在医疗保健教育中得到了广泛应用,但将其用作实习模式还处于起步阶段。学生和教育工作者的经验和看法对于模拟实习的发展非常重要。 我们在八个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,以确定探讨护理和专职医疗专业学生或教育工作者经验的定性和混合方法研究。八项研究符合纳入标准,并采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的定性研究批判性评估清单对研究方法的质量进行了评估。根据 JBI 的定性证据审查指南,采用元汇总法对结果进行了综合。 从八项研究中共提取了 69 项研究结果。这些结果被分为九类,形成了三个总体质量较低的综合结果。这些研究结果涉及:(1) 模拟实习的真实性;(2) 模拟实习过程中唤起的情感;(3) 与实施模拟实习相关的机遇和挑战。 模拟实习被认为是提高沟通技能、临床推理技能、创造新知识、加强反思以及为学生和教育者的临床实践做准备的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mixed reality simulation training in the assessment and management of acutely unwell patients in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study Virtual reality versus webinar trans healthcare training for emergency medicine residents: a feasibility study Using Forum Theatre techniques in teaching and learning about professionalism and communication in healthcare Revising the ASPiH standards: reflections on the evolution of simulated practice Stress and resilience among military medical students completing a high-fidelity military medical simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1