A Comparative Study on Suitability of AHP and TOPSIS for Identifying optimal Conceptual Design of Bearing Puller

Philip Vincent
{"title":"A Comparative Study on Suitability of AHP and TOPSIS for Identifying optimal Conceptual Design of Bearing Puller","authors":"Philip Vincent","doi":"10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i121053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design process of the bearing puller involves various stages that can be grouped into conceptualization of ideas based on design criteria and functional requirements. This is followed by concept generation and selection for optimal design. Concept selection is an important activity in engineering design process, because it involves decision making considering various factors. In this project, computer aided design of four bearing puller was developed after a thorough consideration of the design criteria and factors of an optimal design. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) were used in order to ascertain their suitability for selecting optimal design in engineering. The result obtained from the comparison process proves that both processes are suitable because there are no ties in the final selection of the optimal design concept. The AHP and TOPSIS shows the same design concept irrespective of the processes. This is an indication that both concept selection process considered the weight factor of the level of importance of functional requirement or design criteria. In view of this, it has been proven that whenever the weigh factor remains the same, both processes will give the same result, at least for the considered case. This result may vary when they are both applied for design process of other products.","PeriodicalId":340494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research and Reports","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i121053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design process of the bearing puller involves various stages that can be grouped into conceptualization of ideas based on design criteria and functional requirements. This is followed by concept generation and selection for optimal design. Concept selection is an important activity in engineering design process, because it involves decision making considering various factors. In this project, computer aided design of four bearing puller was developed after a thorough consideration of the design criteria and factors of an optimal design. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) were used in order to ascertain their suitability for selecting optimal design in engineering. The result obtained from the comparison process proves that both processes are suitable because there are no ties in the final selection of the optimal design concept. The AHP and TOPSIS shows the same design concept irrespective of the processes. This is an indication that both concept selection process considered the weight factor of the level of importance of functional requirement or design criteria. In view of this, it has been proven that whenever the weigh factor remains the same, both processes will give the same result, at least for the considered case. This result may vary when they are both applied for design process of other products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于 AHP 和 TOPSIS 在确定轴承拉拔器最佳概念设计方面适用性的比较研究
轴承拉拔器的设计过程涉及多个阶段,可归纳为根据设计标准和功能要求进行构思。随后是概念生成和优化设计的选择。概念选择是工程设计过程中的一项重要活动,因为它涉及到考虑各种因素的决策。在本项目中,在全面考虑设计标准和优化设计的因素后,开发了四轴承拉拔器的计算机辅助设计。分析层次过程(AHP)和通过与理想解决方案相似性排序的技术(TOPSIS)被用来确定它们是否适合在工程中选择最佳设计。比较过程得出的结果证明,这两个过程都是合适的,因为在最终选择最佳设计概念时没有出现并列情况。无论采用哪种方法,AHP 和 TOPSIS 都显示出相同的设计概念。这表明两种概念选择过程都考虑了功能要求或设计标准重要程度的权重因素。有鉴于此,事实证明,只要权重系数保持不变,两种方法都会得出相同的结果,至少在所考虑的情况下是这样。当这两种方法都用于其他产品的设计过程时,结果可能会有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Machine Learning Model for Network Anomaly Detection: Support Vector Machine A Short Review of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia (YSZ) for Thermal Barrier Coatings: Recent Progress The Affects of Ce Doping Cr\(_2\)O\(_3\) Based Catalysts Supported on Activated Carbon for 1,2-Dichloroethane Abatement Numerical Comparison of Cu and Al\(_2\) O\(_3\) Nanoparticles in an MHD Water-based Nanofluid Novel Illumination-invariant Face Recognition Approach via Reflectance-luminance and Local Matching Model with Weighted Voting System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1