Three Objectives of International banking Regulation: Analysis of Their Interrelationship and Issues

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Finance: Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-6-79-88
E. Dzhagityan, O. R. Mukhametov
{"title":"Three Objectives of International banking Regulation: Analysis of Their Interrelationship and Issues","authors":"E. Dzhagityan, O. R. Mukhametov","doi":"10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-6-79-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to the Global Financial Crisis of 2008–2009, international financial regulators tightened the regime of banking supervision in order to minimize systemic risks, strengthen banking sector resilience and ensure financial stability. Given the increased level of credit risks and the issue of liquidity in the banking sector, as well as the role of banks in promoting the dynamics of the macro-environment, the objectives of banking regulation, through their interrelationship, may conflict with one another, and the research of this phenomenon is the subject of this article. The academic literature excludes research that provides definitive evidence on whether post-crisis banking regulation reform has achieved each of the abovementioned goals, determining the relevance of our study. The scientific novelty is attributed to the principally different approach proposed by the authors in assessing the effectiveness of the post-crisis model of international banking regulation, which is based on the analysis of the interaction and contradictions of the objectives of modern regulatory policy. The purpose of the study is to identify the extent to which the objectives of the post-crisis regulatory model were achieved and to what extent regulatory efforts contribute to the reduction of systemic risks. To achieve the research objectives, the authors applied methods of statistical and comparative analysis, synthesis of factors underlying the post-crisis regulatory mechanism, systematization, generalization and forecasting. The authors analyzed the main elements of the regulatory reform, examined the dynamics of the banking sector, and assessed the impact of the reform on systemic risks and economic growth. The research results show that tighter supervisory standards strengthened bank stress resilience, reduced systemic risks, and had a limited impact on economic growth. The article concludes that the objectives of banking regulation actively interact, but do not conflict: a consistent transition to the new Basel III standards allows each objective to be achieved.","PeriodicalId":36110,"journal":{"name":"Finance: Theory and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-6-79-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the Global Financial Crisis of 2008–2009, international financial regulators tightened the regime of banking supervision in order to minimize systemic risks, strengthen banking sector resilience and ensure financial stability. Given the increased level of credit risks and the issue of liquidity in the banking sector, as well as the role of banks in promoting the dynamics of the macro-environment, the objectives of banking regulation, through their interrelationship, may conflict with one another, and the research of this phenomenon is the subject of this article. The academic literature excludes research that provides definitive evidence on whether post-crisis banking regulation reform has achieved each of the abovementioned goals, determining the relevance of our study. The scientific novelty is attributed to the principally different approach proposed by the authors in assessing the effectiveness of the post-crisis model of international banking regulation, which is based on the analysis of the interaction and contradictions of the objectives of modern regulatory policy. The purpose of the study is to identify the extent to which the objectives of the post-crisis regulatory model were achieved and to what extent regulatory efforts contribute to the reduction of systemic risks. To achieve the research objectives, the authors applied methods of statistical and comparative analysis, synthesis of factors underlying the post-crisis regulatory mechanism, systematization, generalization and forecasting. The authors analyzed the main elements of the regulatory reform, examined the dynamics of the banking sector, and assessed the impact of the reform on systemic risks and economic growth. The research results show that tighter supervisory standards strengthened bank stress resilience, reduced systemic risks, and had a limited impact on economic growth. The article concludes that the objectives of banking regulation actively interact, but do not conflict: a consistent transition to the new Basel III standards allows each objective to be achieved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际银行监管的三个目标:分析它们之间的相互关系和问题
为应对 2008-2009 年全球金融危机,国际金融监管机构收紧了银行监管制度,以尽量减少系统性风险,加强银行部门的应变能力,确保金融稳定。鉴于银行业信贷风险水平和流动性问题的增加,以及银行对宏观环境动态的促进作用,银行监管的目标通过其相互关系可能会相互冲突,对这一现象的研究是本文的主题。学术文献中没有对危机后银行业监管改革是否实现了上述各项目标提供确切证据的研究,这决定了我们的研究具有现实意义。科学的新颖性在于作者在评估危机后国际银行监管模式的有效性时提出了主要不同的方法,这种方法基于对现代监管政策目标的相互作用和矛盾的分析。研究的目的是确定危机后监管模式的目标在多大程度上得以实现,以及监管工作在多大程度上有助于降低系统性风险。为实现研究目标,作者采用了统计和比较分析、危机后监管机制基础因素综合、系统化、概括和预测等方法。作者分析了监管改革的主要内容,考察了银行业的动态,评估了改革对系统风险和经济增长的影响。研究结果表明,更严格的监管标准加强了银行的抗压能力,降低了系统性风险,对经济增长的影响有限。文章的结论是,银行业监管的目标积极互动,但并不冲突:向新《巴塞尔协议三》标准的一致过渡使每个目标都得以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Finance: Theory and Practice
Finance: Theory and Practice Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intention to Invest has a High Impact on Decision Making? New Contribution to the Planning Field of Financial Behavior in Indonesia Contagion in Commodity Markets under Financial Stress Application of a Model Life Cycle Concept to Investments in Artificial Intelligence Evaluation on the Example of Large Language Models The Road to Financial Resilient: Testing Digital Financial Literacy and Saving Behavior Financial Development of the Russian Federation: Problems of Measurement and Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1