{"title":"“Second after Aquinas ...”: Hans Urs von Balthazar on the Philosophical Aesthetics of V.S. Solovyov","authors":"M. V. Maksimov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.081-096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the book by the Swiss philosopher and theologian H.U. von Balthazar “Vladimir Solovyov”, dedicated to the reconstruction and interpretation of the aesthetic teachings of V.S. Solovyov, is presented. The main themes of Balthazar's work are considered, defining its structure in accordance with the author's vision of the main stages of Solovyov's work: “Visionary and textual form”, “Logic and Metaphysics”, “Ethics and Ecclesiology”, “Aesthetics and Apocalypticism”. The author notes the harmony and consistency of Balthazar's concept, the logic of interpretation of the most important provisions of Solovyov's aesthetics, based on the corpus of his writings, as well as on research Russian and foreign literature. The essential characteristics of Balthazar's consideration of the aesthetics of the Russian philosopher are revealed: the disclosure of its ontological, eschatological and theological aspects. The historical and philosophical origins of Solovyov's ideas, parallels and consonances of the conceptual positions of Solovyov's aesthetics and the largest representatives of domestic and foreign philosophy: Plato, Plotinus, Maxim the Confessor, Schelling, Hegel, Schopenhauer, E. von Hartmann are determined. Balthazar's position on Solovyov's teaching about Sophia in the context of сhristological and trinitarian theology is presented. The assessment of the comparison of Solovyov's method of unity with the methods of studying Dilthey's “forms of spirit” and Spengler's “forms of culture” is given. The researcher's attention is noted to the problems of Solovyov's creative dialogue with outstanding Russian thinkers F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, K.N. Leontiev. The conclusions about the significance of the philosophical and theological reconstruction of Solovyov's aesthetics, carried out by Balthazar, for foreign and Russian Solovyov studies are formulated.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"336 6‐7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.081-096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The analysis of the book by the Swiss philosopher and theologian H.U. von Balthazar “Vladimir Solovyov”, dedicated to the reconstruction and interpretation of the aesthetic teachings of V.S. Solovyov, is presented. The main themes of Balthazar's work are considered, defining its structure in accordance with the author's vision of the main stages of Solovyov's work: “Visionary and textual form”, “Logic and Metaphysics”, “Ethics and Ecclesiology”, “Aesthetics and Apocalypticism”. The author notes the harmony and consistency of Balthazar's concept, the logic of interpretation of the most important provisions of Solovyov's aesthetics, based on the corpus of his writings, as well as on research Russian and foreign literature. The essential characteristics of Balthazar's consideration of the aesthetics of the Russian philosopher are revealed: the disclosure of its ontological, eschatological and theological aspects. The historical and philosophical origins of Solovyov's ideas, parallels and consonances of the conceptual positions of Solovyov's aesthetics and the largest representatives of domestic and foreign philosophy: Plato, Plotinus, Maxim the Confessor, Schelling, Hegel, Schopenhauer, E. von Hartmann are determined. Balthazar's position on Solovyov's teaching about Sophia in the context of сhristological and trinitarian theology is presented. The assessment of the comparison of Solovyov's method of unity with the methods of studying Dilthey's “forms of spirit” and Spengler's “forms of culture” is given. The researcher's attention is noted to the problems of Solovyov's creative dialogue with outstanding Russian thinkers F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, K.N. Leontiev. The conclusions about the significance of the philosophical and theological reconstruction of Solovyov's aesthetics, carried out by Balthazar, for foreign and Russian Solovyov studies are formulated.
瑞士哲学家和神学家巴尔塔扎尔(H.U. von Balthazar)的著作《弗拉基米尔-索洛维约夫》致力于重建和解释弗-索洛维约夫的美学教义,对该书进行了分析。书中探讨了巴尔塔扎尔作品的主要主题,并根据作者对索洛维约夫作品主要阶段的看法确定了其结构:"幻想和文本形式"、"逻辑学和形而上学"、"伦理学和教会学"、"美学和启示录"。作者根据索洛维约夫的著作以及俄罗斯和外国文学研究,指出了巴尔萨扎尔概念的和谐性和一致性,以及索洛维约夫美学最重要条款的解释逻辑。揭示了巴尔塔扎尔对俄罗斯哲学家美学思考的基本特征:揭示其本体论、末世论和神学方面。索洛维约夫思想的历史和哲学渊源,索洛维约夫美学概念立场与国内外哲学代表人物的相似性和一致性:柏拉图、普罗提诺、忏悔者马克西姆、谢林、黑格尔、叔本华、E. von Hartmann。介绍了巴尔塔扎尔在基督论和三位一体神学背景下对索洛维约夫关于索菲亚的教导所持的立场。对索洛维约夫的统一性方法与狄尔泰的 "精神形式 "和斯宾格勒的 "文化形式 "研究方法的比较进行了评估。研究者注意到索洛维约夫与俄罗斯杰出思想家 F.M.陀思妥耶夫斯基、L.N.托尔斯泰、K.N.列昂季耶夫进行创造性对话的问题。巴尔塔扎尔对索洛维约夫美学进行的哲学和神学重建对外国和俄罗斯的索洛维约夫研究具有重要意义。