Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters

E. Fraiman, Rachel Pope
{"title":"Surgeons’ perspectives for a future obstetric fistula classification system: exploring the key parameters","authors":"E. Fraiman, Rachel Pope","doi":"10.29392/001c.77981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is currently no unified classification scheme for accurately describing vesico-vaginal fistulas, thereby limiting communication between surgeons and the ability to compare research. Many factors related to surgical failure or success have not been explored, and surgeons currently do not universally use the same classifications. The objective of this study is to determine which factors are the most important to include in a future obstetric fistula classification scheme. Members of the International Society of Obstetric Fistula Surgeons were surveyed using a non-validated questionnaire to explore their experience and factors they think were most important to include in an updated comprehensive obstetric fistula classification scheme. Based on the surgeons’ response, an average ranking of each determinant of obstetric fistula classification system was computed. The most critical factors that surgeons found necessary to include in an updated fistula classification system are the bladder size (88.9%, n=16, rank=8.53), degree of fibrosis of the vagina (83.3%, n=15, rank=8.12), degree of urethral damage (88.9%, n=16, rank=9.34), location of the fistula (100%, n=18, rank=9.22), urethral length (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.06), and whether the fistula is circumferential or not (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.18). The least important factors were how long the patient had had a fistula (11.1%, n=2, rank=2.28) and intraoperative complications (22.2%, n=4, rank=4.59). For most factors important in repair, there was a non-significant correlation between experience level and ratings from 0-10. Scores for urethral length showed a significant correlation between increased surgical experience and higher ratings of importance. Three most commonly used classification schemes by Goh, Waaldjik, and the World Health Organization (WHO) only capture some important factors determined by the surveyed surgeons. Given the inconsistency between what experienced and expert surgeons deem to be important determinants for the classification of obstetric fistula and what is currently included in classification systems, we call for constructing a new, validated classification system.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.77981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is currently no unified classification scheme for accurately describing vesico-vaginal fistulas, thereby limiting communication between surgeons and the ability to compare research. Many factors related to surgical failure or success have not been explored, and surgeons currently do not universally use the same classifications. The objective of this study is to determine which factors are the most important to include in a future obstetric fistula classification scheme. Members of the International Society of Obstetric Fistula Surgeons were surveyed using a non-validated questionnaire to explore their experience and factors they think were most important to include in an updated comprehensive obstetric fistula classification scheme. Based on the surgeons’ response, an average ranking of each determinant of obstetric fistula classification system was computed. The most critical factors that surgeons found necessary to include in an updated fistula classification system are the bladder size (88.9%, n=16, rank=8.53), degree of fibrosis of the vagina (83.3%, n=15, rank=8.12), degree of urethral damage (88.9%, n=16, rank=9.34), location of the fistula (100%, n=18, rank=9.22), urethral length (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.06), and whether the fistula is circumferential or not (94.4%, n=17, rank=9.18). The least important factors were how long the patient had had a fistula (11.1%, n=2, rank=2.28) and intraoperative complications (22.2%, n=4, rank=4.59). For most factors important in repair, there was a non-significant correlation between experience level and ratings from 0-10. Scores for urethral length showed a significant correlation between increased surgical experience and higher ratings of importance. Three most commonly used classification schemes by Goh, Waaldjik, and the World Health Organization (WHO) only capture some important factors determined by the surveyed surgeons. Given the inconsistency between what experienced and expert surgeons deem to be important determinants for the classification of obstetric fistula and what is currently included in classification systems, we call for constructing a new, validated classification system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科医生对未来产科瘘分类系统的看法:探索关键参数
目前还没有统一的分类方案来准确描述膀胱阴道瘘,因此限制了外科医生之间的交流和比较研究的能力。许多与手术失败或成功相关的因素尚未得到探讨,外科医生目前也没有普遍使用相同的分类方法。本研究的目的是确定哪些因素是未来产科瘘分类计划中最重要的因素。国际产科瘘管病外科医生学会的成员接受了未经验证的问卷调查,以了解他们的经验以及他们认为应纳入最新产科瘘管病综合分类方案的最重要因素。根据外科医生的答复,计算了产科瘘管病分类系统各决定因素的平均排序。外科医生认为有必要纳入最新瘘管分类系统的最关键因素是膀胱大小(88.9%,n=16,排名=8.53)、阴道纤维化程度(83.3%,n=15,排名=8.12)、尿道损伤程度(88.9%,n=16,排名=9.34)、瘘管位置(100%,n=18,排名=9.22)、尿道长度(94.4%,n=17,排名=9.06)以及瘘管是否环绕(94.4%,n=17,排名=9.18)。最不重要的因素是患者瘘管存在的时间(11.1%,n=2,排名=2.28)和术中并发症(22.2%,n=4,排名=4.59)。对于修复中的大多数重要因素,经验水平与 0-10 分的评分之间无显著相关性。对尿道长度的评分显示,手术经验的增加与较高的重要性评分之间存在显著相关性。Goh、Waaldjik 和世界卫生组织(WHO)三种最常用的分类方案只包含受访外科医生确定的部分重要因素。鉴于经验丰富的专家外科医生认为产科瘘分类的重要决定因素与目前分类系统中包含的因素不一致,我们呼吁建立一个新的、经过验证的分类系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Nigeria’s surgical plan: leveraging media engagement for cleft lip and palate to drive advocacy for access to surgical healthcare Digital health interventions in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review protocol Developing conceptual framework and methodological considerations in community-supported chronic disease management Using spirometry for screening and diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases in primary health care: findings from a community health project in rural India Maternal health in cities: analysis of institutional maternal mortality and health system bottlenecks in Kampala City Uganda, 2016-2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1