EPidemiology Of Cardiogenic sHock in Scotland (EPOCHS): A multicentre, prospective observational study of the prevalence, management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in Scotland

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1177/17511437231217877
A. Warren, Philip McCall, Alastair Proudfoot, Stuart Gillon, Ahmad Abu-Arafeh, A. McKnight, Rosemary Mudie, David Armstrong, E. Tzolos, J. Livesey, A. Sinclair, Veronica Baston, Jonathan Dalzell, Deborah Owen, Lucy Fleming, I. Scott, A. Puxty, Matthew M Y Lee, Fiona Walker, Simon Hobson, Euan Campbell, Michael Kinsella, Eilidh McGinnigle, Robert B. Docking, Grant Price, Alex Ramsay, Richard Bauld, Suzanne Herron, Nazir I Lone, Nicholas L Mills, Louise Hartley
{"title":"EPidemiology Of Cardiogenic sHock in Scotland (EPOCHS): A multicentre, prospective observational study of the prevalence, management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock in Scotland","authors":"A. Warren, Philip McCall, Alastair Proudfoot, Stuart Gillon, Ahmad Abu-Arafeh, A. McKnight, Rosemary Mudie, David Armstrong, E. Tzolos, J. Livesey, A. Sinclair, Veronica Baston, Jonathan Dalzell, Deborah Owen, Lucy Fleming, I. Scott, A. Puxty, Matthew M Y Lee, Fiona Walker, Simon Hobson, Euan Campbell, Michael Kinsella, Eilidh McGinnigle, Robert B. Docking, Grant Price, Alex Ramsay, Richard Bauld, Suzanne Herron, Nazir I Lone, Nicholas L Mills, Louise Hartley","doi":"10.1177/17511437231217877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite high rates of cardiovascular disease in Scotland, the prevalence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock are unknown. We undertook a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit at 13 hospitals in Scotland for a 6-month period. Denominator data from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group were used to estimate ICU prevalence; data for coronary care units were unavailable. We undertook multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. In total, 247 patients with cardiogenic shock were included. After exclusion of coronary care unit admissions, this comprised 3.0% of all ICU admissions during the study period (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6%–3.5%). Aetiology was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 48%. The commonest vasoactive treatment was noradrenaline (56%) followed by adrenaline (46%) and dobutamine (40%). Mechanical circulatory support was used in 30%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 55%. After multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06), admission lactate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05–1.19), Society for Cardiovascular Angiographic Intervention stage D or E at presentation (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10–4.29) and use of adrenaline (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.40–5.40) were associated with mortality. In Scotland the prevalence of cardiogenic shock was 3% of all ICU admissions; more than half died prior to discharge. There was significant variation in treatment approaches, particularly with respect to vasoactive support strategy.","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"280 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437231217877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite high rates of cardiovascular disease in Scotland, the prevalence and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock are unknown. We undertook a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit at 13 hospitals in Scotland for a 6-month period. Denominator data from the Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group were used to estimate ICU prevalence; data for coronary care units were unavailable. We undertook multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality. In total, 247 patients with cardiogenic shock were included. After exclusion of coronary care unit admissions, this comprised 3.0% of all ICU admissions during the study period (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6%–3.5%). Aetiology was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 48%. The commonest vasoactive treatment was noradrenaline (56%) followed by adrenaline (46%) and dobutamine (40%). Mechanical circulatory support was used in 30%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 55%. After multivariable logistic regression, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06), admission lactate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05–1.19), Society for Cardiovascular Angiographic Intervention stage D or E at presentation (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.10–4.29) and use of adrenaline (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.40–5.40) were associated with mortality. In Scotland the prevalence of cardiogenic shock was 3% of all ICU admissions; more than half died prior to discharge. There was significant variation in treatment approaches, particularly with respect to vasoactive support strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰心源性休克流行病学(EPOCHS):一项关于苏格兰心源性休克发病率、管理和预后的多中心前瞻性观察研究
尽管苏格兰的心血管疾病发病率很高,但心源性休克患者的发病率和预后却不为人知。我们对苏格兰 13 家医院重症监护室(ICU)或冠心病监护室连续收治的心源性休克患者进行了为期 6 个月的前瞻性队列观察研究。我们使用苏格兰重症监护协会审计小组提供的分母数据来估算重症监护病房的发病率;冠心病监护病房的数据不详。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,以确定与院内死亡率相关的因素。总共纳入了 247 名心源性休克患者。在排除冠心病监护病房收治的患者后,这些患者占研究期间所有入住 ICU 患者的 3.0%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:2.6%-3.5%)。48%的病因是急性心肌梗死(AMI)。最常见的血管活性疗法是去甲肾上腺素(56%),其次是肾上腺素(46%)和多巴酚丁胺(40%)。30%的患者使用了机械循环支持。院内总死亡率为 55%。经过多变量逻辑回归,年龄(几率比 [OR] 1.04,95% CI 1.02-1.06)、入院乳酸(OR 1.10,95% CI 1.05-1.19)、发病时心血管造影介入学会 D 或 E 期(OR 2.16,95% CI 1.10-4.29)和肾上腺素的使用(OR 2.73,95% CI 1.40-5.40)与死亡率有关。在苏格兰,心源性休克的发病率占所有入住重症监护室患者的 3%;一半以上的患者在出院前死亡。治疗方法存在很大差异,尤其是在血管活性支持策略方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
期刊最新文献
Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units. In vivo assessment of a modification of a domiciliary ventilator which reduces oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated patients. Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey. Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial. Should viscoelastic testing be a standard point-of-care test on all intensive care units?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1