How Are E-Scooter Speed-Limiter Settings Associated with User Behavior? Observed Speeds and Road, Sidewalk, and Bike Lane Use in Austin, TX, and Washington, D.C.

Jessica B. Cicchino, Neil K. Chaudhary, Mark G. Solomon
{"title":"How Are E-Scooter Speed-Limiter Settings Associated with User Behavior? Observed Speeds and Road, Sidewalk, and Bike Lane Use in Austin, TX, and Washington, D.C.","authors":"Jessica B. Cicchino, Neil K. Chaudhary, Mark G. Solomon","doi":"10.1177/03611981231214518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many cities limit the top speeds of shared e-scooters, but little is known about how these policies affect user behavior. This study measured speeds and observed use of roads, sidewalks, and bike lanes for 2,004 e-scooter riders in Washington, D.C., where shared e-scooters were equipped with speed governors that limited their speed to 10 mph, and Austin, TX, where the limit was 20 mph. At locations without bike lanes, riders in Washington were 51% more likely to ride on sidewalks than in Austin when accounting for environmental and rider characteristics. Over 80% of e-scooter users rode in bike lanes in both cities when they were available. Although the mean riding speed on sidewalks was not significantly higher in Austin than in Washington, demonstrating self-regulation of speed on sidewalks, the percentage of e-scooter riders traveling on sidewalks at speeds ≥10 mph (41% in Austin versus 17% in Washington) or ≥15 mph (9% in Austin versus <1% in Washington) was higher in Austin. Increased sidewalk riding associated with setting shared e-scooter speed limiters to 10 mph could potentially lead to more interactions with pedestrians, but lower e-scooter speeds at the high end of the distribution may mitigate injury risk to them. Bike lanes could provide space for e-scooters to ride where their speeds would more closely match other users. Future refinements to technology to identify sidewalk riding more accurately could potentially allow maximum e-scooter speeds to be adjusted to mix with pedestrians on sidewalks and cyclists in bike lanes.","PeriodicalId":309251,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231214518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many cities limit the top speeds of shared e-scooters, but little is known about how these policies affect user behavior. This study measured speeds and observed use of roads, sidewalks, and bike lanes for 2,004 e-scooter riders in Washington, D.C., where shared e-scooters were equipped with speed governors that limited their speed to 10 mph, and Austin, TX, where the limit was 20 mph. At locations without bike lanes, riders in Washington were 51% more likely to ride on sidewalks than in Austin when accounting for environmental and rider characteristics. Over 80% of e-scooter users rode in bike lanes in both cities when they were available. Although the mean riding speed on sidewalks was not significantly higher in Austin than in Washington, demonstrating self-regulation of speed on sidewalks, the percentage of e-scooter riders traveling on sidewalks at speeds ≥10 mph (41% in Austin versus 17% in Washington) or ≥15 mph (9% in Austin versus <1% in Washington) was higher in Austin. Increased sidewalk riding associated with setting shared e-scooter speed limiters to 10 mph could potentially lead to more interactions with pedestrians, but lower e-scooter speeds at the high end of the distribution may mitigate injury risk to them. Bike lanes could provide space for e-scooters to ride where their speeds would more closely match other users. Future refinements to technology to identify sidewalk riding more accurately could potentially allow maximum e-scooter speeds to be adjusted to mix with pedestrians on sidewalks and cyclists in bike lanes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动滑板车限速设置与用户行为有何关联?德克萨斯州奥斯汀和华盛顿特区的观察速度与道路、人行道和自行车道使用情况
许多城市限制共享电动滑板车的最高车速,但人们对这些政策如何影响用户行为知之甚少。这项研究测量了华盛顿特区和德克萨斯州奥斯汀市 2004 名电动滑板车骑行者的速度,并观察了他们对道路、人行道和自行车道的使用情况,华盛顿特区的共享电动滑板车配备了限速器,限速为每小时 10 英里,德克萨斯州奥斯汀市的限速为每小时 20 英里。在没有自行车道的地点,考虑到环境和骑行者的特点,华盛顿骑行者在人行道上骑行的可能性比奥斯汀高 51%。在这两个城市,超过 80% 的电动滑板车用户在有自行车道的地方骑行。虽然奥斯汀人行道上的平均骑行速度并没有明显高于华盛顿,这表明人行道上的骑行速度是自我调节的,但在奥斯汀,在人行道上骑行速度≥10 mph(奥斯汀为 41%,华盛顿为 17%)或≥15 mph(奥斯汀为 9%,华盛顿为 <1%)的电动滑板车骑行者比例更高。将共享电动滑板车限速设置为每小时 10 英里,会增加人行道上的骑行人数,这可能会导致与行人发生更多的互动,但较低的电动滑板车速度分布可能会降低行人受伤的风险。自行车道可为电动滑板车提供骑行空间,使其速度更接近其他用户。未来对技术的改进可以更准确地识别人行道上的骑行情况,从而有可能调整电动滑板车的最高速度,使其与人行道上的行人和自行车道上的骑车人混合行驶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Traffic Safety Analysis using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology at Unsignalized Intersections in Heterogeneous Traffic Role of Bystanders on Women’s Perception of Personal Security When Using Public Transport Comprehensive Investigation of Pedestrian Hit-and-Run Crashes: Applying XGBoost and Binary Logistic Regression Model Insights for Sustainable Urban Transport via Private Charging Pile Sharing in the Electric Vehicle Sector Correlates of Modal Substitution and Induced Travel of Ridehailing in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1