Creation of a Scientific System for Analyzing the Scientific Activities of a University as a Source of Innovation in the Production of Medicines

E. V. Sokolova, P. Guryanov, A. G. Salnikova, T. Malkova
{"title":"Creation of a Scientific System for Analyzing the Scientific Activities of a University as a Source of Innovation in the Production of Medicines","authors":"E. V. Sokolova, P. Guryanov, A. G. Salnikova, T. Malkova","doi":"10.33380/2305-2066-2023-12-4(1)-1618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The creation of new medicines and their introduction into production depends, in particular, on the organization of scientific research in pharmaceutical universities. The ability to fully utilize all the material, financial and human resources available to a university determines the possibility of effectively generating pharmaceutical innovations. This, in turn, is possible if there are methods of scientific analysis of the process of scientific activity of a university.Aim. Creation of methods for scientific analysis of the process of scientific activity of a university, allowing, on the basis of regularly collected information about the scientific activity of departments, to identify areas for improving the organization of scientific research.Materials and methods. The study used logical, analytical-synthetic research methods, modeling, and the method of expert assessments. The scientific reports of the Perm State Pharmaceutical Academy (PSFA) departments for 2019 were studied.Results and discussion. A model of the functioning of the scientific activities of a university has been developed using the example of PSFA, reflecting the degree of interaction of individual departments with each other. Original methods for assessing the effectiveness of individual departments were developed based on the ratio of material, financial, and human resources invested in the work of the departments, and the scientific and practical output obtained as a result of scientific activities.Conclusion. The created model for organizing the scientific activities of the university made it possible to identify departments as “generators” and “successors of scientific research”, as well as the phenomenon of imbalance or lack of interaction between departments. Original methods for assessing human resources and scientific output of the department have been created. To evaluate the work of the department, a rule was formulated for the balance between the resources invested in the work of the department and the scientific result obtained, as well as the balance between the scientific output itself, expressed in scientific publications, and the practical output, expressed in received patents, grants and implementation acts.","PeriodicalId":11259,"journal":{"name":"Drug development & registration","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug development & registration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2023-12-4(1)-1618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The creation of new medicines and their introduction into production depends, in particular, on the organization of scientific research in pharmaceutical universities. The ability to fully utilize all the material, financial and human resources available to a university determines the possibility of effectively generating pharmaceutical innovations. This, in turn, is possible if there are methods of scientific analysis of the process of scientific activity of a university.Aim. Creation of methods for scientific analysis of the process of scientific activity of a university, allowing, on the basis of regularly collected information about the scientific activity of departments, to identify areas for improving the organization of scientific research.Materials and methods. The study used logical, analytical-synthetic research methods, modeling, and the method of expert assessments. The scientific reports of the Perm State Pharmaceutical Academy (PSFA) departments for 2019 were studied.Results and discussion. A model of the functioning of the scientific activities of a university has been developed using the example of PSFA, reflecting the degree of interaction of individual departments with each other. Original methods for assessing the effectiveness of individual departments were developed based on the ratio of material, financial, and human resources invested in the work of the departments, and the scientific and practical output obtained as a result of scientific activities.Conclusion. The created model for organizing the scientific activities of the university made it possible to identify departments as “generators” and “successors of scientific research”, as well as the phenomenon of imbalance or lack of interaction between departments. Original methods for assessing human resources and scientific output of the department have been created. To evaluate the work of the department, a rule was formulated for the balance between the resources invested in the work of the department and the scientific result obtained, as well as the balance between the scientific output itself, expressed in scientific publications, and the practical output, expressed in received patents, grants and implementation acts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创建科学系统,分析作为药品生产创新源泉的大学科学活动
导言。新药的开发和投入生产尤其取决于药科大学的科研组织工作。能否充分利用大学现有的所有物力、财力和人力资源,决定了能否有效地进行医药创新。反过来,如果有对大学科学活动过程进行科学分析的方法,这也是可能的。建立对大学科研活动过程进行科学分析的方法,以便在定期收集各系科研活动信息的基础上,确定改进科研组织工作的领域。研究采用了逻辑分析法、分析-综合研究法、建模法和专家评估法。研究了彼尔姆国立药学院(PSFA)各系 2019 年的科研报告。以彼尔姆国立药学院为例,建立了大学科学活动的运作模型,反映了各个部门之间的互动程度。根据投入到各部门工作中的物力、财力和人力资源的比例,以及科学活动所取得的科学和实践成果,制定了评估各部门效率的独创方法。所创建的大学科研活动组织模式使我们有可能确定作为 "科研创造者 "和 "科研继承者 "的部门,以及部门之间不平衡或缺乏互动的现象。对系的人力资源和科研成果进行评估的独创方法已经形成。为评估部门工作,制定了部门工作投入的资源与取得的科学成果之间的平衡规则,以及以科学出版物表示的科学产出本身与以获得的专利、赠款和实施法案表示的实际产出之间的平衡规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of UV-spectrophotometry method for quantitative determination of amorphous darunavir Identification of luteolin-7-glucoside metabolites after oral administration and development of a method for their quantitative analysis Analysis of the distribution and persistence of organophosphorus pesticides malathion and diazinon in herbal plants Evaluation of drug release from topical dosage forms and permeability prediction through the skin barrier (review) A biorelevant test for tablets glycine sublingual in the «simulated saliva» dissolution medium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1