A big data analytics method for the influence of WeChat public platform articles on blood donation behavior

Xinyu Guo, Xu Chen, Xiaoke Liang
{"title":"A big data analytics method for the influence of WeChat public platform articles on blood donation behavior","authors":"Xinyu Guo, Xu Chen, Xiaoke Liang","doi":"10.1108/imds-08-2023-0571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the impact and mechanism of WeChat public platforms articles (abbreviated as WPP) on blood donation behavior using data of WPPA and donation behavior data.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses multiple linear regression methods, web crawlers and natural language processing technology. It first quantifies the impact of WPP published articles on donation behavior. On this basis, it then selects data from the day of article publication to further study the impact of article dissemination on donation behavior from the perspective of reading quantity, and analyzes the influencing factors of article reading quantity.FindingsThe results show that on the same day that an article is published, there is an increase of 13.8 and 14.3% in blood donation volume and fan registrations, respectively. The mediating effect exists. However, the day after an article is published, there is no longer any effect on blood donations. With a 1% increase in reading quantity, blood donation volume on the day of article publication increases by 0.13%, and this positive impact is promoted by the quality of the articles. A conc ise articles title and body and rich images help drive reading quantity. Moreover, blood donors prefer to read articles about blood dynamics and donation promotion, while articles about news, announcements and administrative affairs make them less inclined to read.Originality/valueFirst, it focuses on WPPA, quantifies the impact of articles on blood donation behavior and analyzes the mechanism. Second, the authors study the impact and timeliness of social media article dissemination to address the insufficiency of existing research. Third, the study provides a scientific basis for the editing and publishing of articles, helping blood banks improve the effectiveness of publicity and recruitment.","PeriodicalId":270213,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-08-2023-0571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the impact and mechanism of WeChat public platforms articles (abbreviated as WPP) on blood donation behavior using data of WPPA and donation behavior data.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses multiple linear regression methods, web crawlers and natural language processing technology. It first quantifies the impact of WPP published articles on donation behavior. On this basis, it then selects data from the day of article publication to further study the impact of article dissemination on donation behavior from the perspective of reading quantity, and analyzes the influencing factors of article reading quantity.FindingsThe results show that on the same day that an article is published, there is an increase of 13.8 and 14.3% in blood donation volume and fan registrations, respectively. The mediating effect exists. However, the day after an article is published, there is no longer any effect on blood donations. With a 1% increase in reading quantity, blood donation volume on the day of article publication increases by 0.13%, and this positive impact is promoted by the quality of the articles. A conc ise articles title and body and rich images help drive reading quantity. Moreover, blood donors prefer to read articles about blood dynamics and donation promotion, while articles about news, announcements and administrative affairs make them less inclined to read.Originality/valueFirst, it focuses on WPPA, quantifies the impact of articles on blood donation behavior and analyzes the mechanism. Second, the authors study the impact and timeliness of social media article dissemination to address the insufficiency of existing research. Third, the study provides a scientific basis for the editing and publishing of articles, helping blood banks improve the effectiveness of publicity and recruitment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微信公众平台文章对献血行为影响的大数据分析方法
目的本文旨在利用微信公众平台数据和献血行为数据,探讨微信公众平台文章(简称WPP)对献血行为的影响及机制。它首先量化了 WPP 发表的文章对献血行为的影响。在此基础上,选取文章发表当天的数据,从阅读量的角度进一步研究文章传播对捐献行为的影响,并分析文章阅读量的影响因素。结果结果显示,文章发表当天,献血量和粉丝注册量分别增加了 13.8%和 14.3%。存在中介效应。然而,文章发表后第二天,对献血量不再有任何影响。阅读量每增加 1%,文章发表当天的献血量就会增加 0.13%,而文章质量则会促进这一积极影响。简洁的文章标题和正文以及丰富的图片有助于提高阅读量。此外,献血者更愿意阅读有关血液动态和献血宣传的文章,而有关新闻、公告和行政事务的文章则会降低他们的阅读倾向。第二,作者研究了社交媒体文章传播的影响力和时效性,解决了现有研究的不足。第三,该研究为文章的编辑和发布提供了科学依据,有助于血站提高宣传和招募效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence drivers' effect on willingness to adopt the human capital supply chain in manufacturing firms: an empirical investigation from developing countries – a mediation model Linking transformational leadership and digital creativity from the lens of social cognitive theory Corrected Aggregate Workload approach on order release by considering job’s routing position induced variable indirect load Emerging opportunities for information systems researchers to expand their PLS-SEM analytical toolbox Sourcing from supplier in the presence of financial service providers’ information asymmetry and quit probabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1