Assessing Foster/Adoptive Parent Training Curriculum's Improvement of Resource Parent Knowledge and Skills

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Research on Social Work Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1177/10497315231222813
Amy M. Salazar, Angelique G. Day, Jenna Thompson, Emma Buckland Young, Jaidyanne Podsobinski, John Fowler, Lori A. Vanderwill, Sara S. Spiers, Metta Kongira
{"title":"Assessing Foster/Adoptive Parent Training Curriculum's Improvement of Resource Parent Knowledge and Skills","authors":"Amy M. Salazar, Angelique G. Day, Jenna Thompson, Emma Buckland Young, Jaidyanne Podsobinski, John Fowler, Lori A. Vanderwill, Sara S. Spiers, Metta Kongira","doi":"10.1177/10497315231222813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caregiving for children in foster, kinship, and adoptive placements (hereon referred to as resource parenting) is a challenging role that requires unique knowledge and skills, but there is limited evidence for currently available trainings. The National Training and Development Curriculum for Foster and Adoptive Parents (NTDC) was recently developed with support from the US Children's Bureau. Baseline and 6-month follow-up surveys from 540 resource parents receiving NTDC training and 409 receiving training-as-usual (propensity score matched; group assignment based on location) were compared on a variety of knowledge types and skills. NTDC parents had larger growth in trauma-informed parenting, potential to promote positive child development, and key resource parent knowledge from baseline to post-training. NTDC parent growth in receptivity to working with biological parents approached but did not reach statistical significance. NTDC offers promise as a new training resource for improving resource parent knowledge and skills.","PeriodicalId":47993,"journal":{"name":"Research on Social Work Practice","volume":"29 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315231222813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caregiving for children in foster, kinship, and adoptive placements (hereon referred to as resource parenting) is a challenging role that requires unique knowledge and skills, but there is limited evidence for currently available trainings. The National Training and Development Curriculum for Foster and Adoptive Parents (NTDC) was recently developed with support from the US Children's Bureau. Baseline and 6-month follow-up surveys from 540 resource parents receiving NTDC training and 409 receiving training-as-usual (propensity score matched; group assignment based on location) were compared on a variety of knowledge types and skills. NTDC parents had larger growth in trauma-informed parenting, potential to promote positive child development, and key resource parent knowledge from baseline to post-training. NTDC parent growth in receptivity to working with biological parents approached but did not reach statistical significance. NTDC offers promise as a new training resource for improving resource parent knowledge and skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估寄养/领养父母培训课程对资源父母知识和技能的提高作用
照顾寄养、亲属收养和领养儿童(以下简称资源养育)是一个具有挑战性的角色,需要独特的知识和技能,但目前可用培训的证据有限。在美国儿童局的支持下,寄养和收养父母国家培训与发展课程(NTDC)于近期开发完成。对接受 NTDC 培训的 540 名资源父母和接受常规培训的 409 名资源父母(倾向得分匹配;根据地点进行分组)进行了基线和 6 个月的跟踪调查,并就各种知识类型和技能进行了比较。从基线到培训后,NTDC 家长在创伤知情养育、促进儿童积极发展的潜力以及资源家长关键知识方面的增长幅度更大。在与亲生父母合作的接受能力方面,NTDC 家长的增长接近统计学意义,但未达到统计学意义。作为一种新的培训资源,NTDC 有望提高资源父母的知识和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Research on Social Work Practice, sponsored by the Society for Social Work and Research, is a disciplinary journal devoted to the publication of empirical research concerning the methods and outcomes of social work practice. Social work practice is broadly interpreted to refer to the application of intentionally designed social work intervention programs to problems of societal and/or interpersonal importance, including behavior analysis or psychotherapy involving individuals; case management; practice involving couples, families, and small groups; community practice education; and the development, implementation, and evaluation of social policies.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Social Work Education and the Grand Challenges; Approaches to Curricula and Field Education by R. Paul Maiden and Eugenia L. Weiss Guardrails Needed for Social Science Research Book Review: Addiction Treatment: A Strengths Perspective by Katherine Van Wormer and Diane Rae Davis Response to the Respondents: The NIMH Task Force Report on Social Work Research Sample Size Planning in the Design of Two-Level Randomized Cost-Effectiveness Trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1