The use of prognostic scales to assess the effectiveness of the use of anti-cytokine drugs in patients with moderate and severe course of a new coronavirus infection

S. V. Nagumanov, A. T. Abdrashitova, E. A. Popov
{"title":"The use of prognostic scales to assess the effectiveness of the use of anti-cytokine drugs in patients with moderate and severe course of a new coronavirus infection","authors":"S. V. Nagumanov, A. T. Abdrashitova, E. A. Popov","doi":"10.17021/1992-6499-2023-4-67-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim. To analyze the effectiveness of the use of anti-cytokine drugs (tocilizumab, olokizumab and sarilumab) in a single-center retrospective cohort study based on the prediction of clinical outcomes using prognostic scales, with a single administration in patients with moderate to severe course of a new coronavirus infection.Materials and methods. The retrospective cohort study included three groups of patients with single administration of tocilizumab (65 patients), olokizumab (56 patients) and sarilumab (26 patients). All patients were treated in a repurposed infectious diseases hospital for patients with COVID-19 on the basis of Аlexandro-Mariinskaya Regional Clinical Hospital in the period January- August 2021. Upon admission to the hospital and 2 days after administration of the drug, patients were predicted the severity of the course and outcome using prognostic scales: 4C Mortality Score, COVID-GRAM, SHOCS-COVID.Results. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the use of anti-cytokine drugs using the 4C Mortality Score scale revealed a further deterioration in the prognosis of clinical outcome in the groups receiving tocilizumab (p = 0,002) and sarilumab (p = 0,031). When using the COVID-GRAM predictive scale, further deterioration of the prognosis was also noted in the tocilizumab (p = 0,004) and olokizumab (p = 0,005) groups. The SHOCS-COVID scale showed a further deterioration in the prognosis in the tocilizumab group (p = 0,001).Conclusion. The use of drugs based on monoclonal antibodies against IL-6 and its receptors in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 did not reveal significant positive dynamics in changing the prognosis of clinical outcome 2 days after administration of these drugs.","PeriodicalId":269283,"journal":{"name":"ASTRAKHAN MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASTRAKHAN MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17021/1992-6499-2023-4-67-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim. To analyze the effectiveness of the use of anti-cytokine drugs (tocilizumab, olokizumab and sarilumab) in a single-center retrospective cohort study based on the prediction of clinical outcomes using prognostic scales, with a single administration in patients with moderate to severe course of a new coronavirus infection.Materials and methods. The retrospective cohort study included three groups of patients with single administration of tocilizumab (65 patients), olokizumab (56 patients) and sarilumab (26 patients). All patients were treated in a repurposed infectious diseases hospital for patients with COVID-19 on the basis of Аlexandro-Mariinskaya Regional Clinical Hospital in the period January- August 2021. Upon admission to the hospital and 2 days after administration of the drug, patients were predicted the severity of the course and outcome using prognostic scales: 4C Mortality Score, COVID-GRAM, SHOCS-COVID.Results. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the use of anti-cytokine drugs using the 4C Mortality Score scale revealed a further deterioration in the prognosis of clinical outcome in the groups receiving tocilizumab (p = 0,002) and sarilumab (p = 0,031). When using the COVID-GRAM predictive scale, further deterioration of the prognosis was also noted in the tocilizumab (p = 0,004) and olokizumab (p = 0,005) groups. The SHOCS-COVID scale showed a further deterioration in the prognosis in the tocilizumab group (p = 0,001).Conclusion. The use of drugs based on monoclonal antibodies against IL-6 and its receptors in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 did not reveal significant positive dynamics in changing the prognosis of clinical outcome 2 days after administration of these drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用预后量表评估新型冠状病毒感染中度和重度病程患者使用抗细胞因子药物的效果
目的在一项单中心回顾性队列研究中,根据预后量表对新冠状病毒感染中重度病程患者的临床结果进行预测,分析抗细胞因子药物(托珠单抗、奥洛珠单抗和沙利单抗)的使用效果。回顾性队列研究包括三组患者,分别使用托珠单抗(65 例)、奥洛珠单抗(56 例)和沙利单抗(26 例)。所有患者均于2021年1月至8月期间在Аlexandro-Mariinskaya地区临床医院基础上为COVID-19患者改建的传染病医院接受治疗。入院时和用药 2 天后,使用预后量表预测患者的病程严重程度和预后:4C 死亡率评分、COVID-GRAM、SHOCS-COVID。使用 4C 死亡率评分表对抗细胞因子药物的使用效果进行比较分析后发现,接受托珠单抗(p = 0.002)和沙利单抗(p = 0.031)治疗组的临床预后进一步恶化。在使用 COVID-GRAM 预测量表时,托西珠单抗组(p = 0.004)和奥利珠单抗组(p = 0.005)的预后也进一步恶化。SHOCS-COVID量表显示,托西珠单抗组的预后进一步恶化(p = 0,001)。结论:对中重度COVID-19患者使用抗IL-6及其受体的单克隆抗体药物,在用药2天后,临床预后并没有明显的积极变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of the neuropeptide compound His-Phe-Arg-Trp-Pro-Gly-Pro on the level of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in conditions of stress-induced depression Influence of 60-day administration of tartrazine and infliction of a defect in the tibia on the histological structure and morphometric parameters of the rat’s thyroid gland Predictors of late spontaneous miscarriages depending on the phenotype of abortion Analysis of morphometric parameters of children’s kidneys according to ultrasound data Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction before surgery: high-sensitivity troponin T or amino-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide type B?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1