Socioeconomic status of the people and their attitude toward conservation in Parsa National Park, Nepal

Kanchan Parajuli, Sonu Adhikari, Sujaya Subedi
{"title":"Socioeconomic status of the people and their attitude toward conservation in Parsa National Park, Nepal","authors":"Kanchan Parajuli, Sonu Adhikari, Sujaya Subedi","doi":"10.26832/24566632.2023.080408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the socioeconomic status of communities living in proximity to a park and their attitudes towards conservation. The questionnaires used in this study were carefully designed to achieve the desired research objectives. The majority of people living adjacent to the park depend on agriculture and livestock farming for their livelihood. People also benefit from the forest's resources in many aspects. People’s perceptions of wildlife conservation vary widely and are influenced by various factors such as economic status, cultural background, education status, awareness level, and personal experiences. Respondents with higher education status have been found to exhibit positive attitudes towards conservation. Results have shown that 70% of respondents who live near the park claim that coexistence with wildlife is becoming increasingly problematic. While the respondents are pleased with the practical conservation strategies that have contributed to the rise in wildlife populations, they are concerned about the increasing conflicts with wildlife. Crop raiding is a serious problem in several villages located near dense forests. Livestock depredation is another major issue that has been observed in the same area. Wildlife has been known to attack and kill livestock, causing a significant loss of income for the farmers in these villages. Many people feel that the lack of effective compensation mechanisms has led to a sense of antagonism towards both authorities and conservation efforts as a whole. The importance of effective compensation mechanisms in conservation efforts cannot be overstated. Some of the respondents have noted that the development of ecotourism has the potential to mitigate human-wildlife conflict. Ecotourism provides jobs, income, and other economic opportunities that help improve their socioeconomic status and, in turn, promote conservation.","PeriodicalId":8147,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2023.080408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the socioeconomic status of communities living in proximity to a park and their attitudes towards conservation. The questionnaires used in this study were carefully designed to achieve the desired research objectives. The majority of people living adjacent to the park depend on agriculture and livestock farming for their livelihood. People also benefit from the forest's resources in many aspects. People’s perceptions of wildlife conservation vary widely and are influenced by various factors such as economic status, cultural background, education status, awareness level, and personal experiences. Respondents with higher education status have been found to exhibit positive attitudes towards conservation. Results have shown that 70% of respondents who live near the park claim that coexistence with wildlife is becoming increasingly problematic. While the respondents are pleased with the practical conservation strategies that have contributed to the rise in wildlife populations, they are concerned about the increasing conflicts with wildlife. Crop raiding is a serious problem in several villages located near dense forests. Livestock depredation is another major issue that has been observed in the same area. Wildlife has been known to attack and kill livestock, causing a significant loss of income for the farmers in these villages. Many people feel that the lack of effective compensation mechanisms has led to a sense of antagonism towards both authorities and conservation efforts as a whole. The importance of effective compensation mechanisms in conservation efforts cannot be overstated. Some of the respondents have noted that the development of ecotourism has the potential to mitigate human-wildlife conflict. Ecotourism provides jobs, income, and other economic opportunities that help improve their socioeconomic status and, in turn, promote conservation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔帕尔萨国家公园居民的社会经济地位及其保护态度
本研究旨在调查生活在公园附近的社区的社会经济状况及其对保护的态度。为实现预期研究目标,本研究精心设计了调查问卷。居住在公园附近的大多数人以农业和畜牧业为生。人们也从森林资源的许多方面受益。人们对野生动物保护的看法差异很大,并受到经济状况、文化背景、教育状况、认识水平和个人经历等各种因素的影响。研究发现,受教育程度较高的受访者对保护野生动物表现出积极的态度。调查结果显示,70% 居住在公园附近的受访者认为,与野生动物共存的问题越来越严重。虽然受访者对有助于野生动物数量增加的实用保护战略感到高兴,但他们对与野生动物日益增加的冲突感到担忧。在密林附近的几个村庄,农作物被盗是一个严重的问题。牲畜被掠夺是同一地区发现的另一个主要问题。据了解,野生动物会攻击和杀害牲畜,给这些村庄的农民造成巨大的收入损失。许多人认为,由于缺乏有效的补偿机制,人们对当局和整个保护工作都产生了敌意。有效的补偿机制在保护工作中的重要性怎么强调都不为过。一些受访者指出,发展生态旅游有可能缓解人类与野生动物之间的冲突。生态旅游提供了工作、收入和其他经济机会,有助于提高他们的社会经济地位,进而促进保护工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biofloc based farming of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in tanks under different stocking densities Present status of brood stock management and breeding operations at Carp Hatcheries in Jashore, Bangladesh Heavy metal concentrations in water from Bakkhali River estuary, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh Variation in heavy metals concentrations among seaweed species from Mkwiro seaweed farm, Kwale County, Kenya Evaluation of elite spring wheat genotypes for grain yield and other agronomic attributes in hills of Sudurpaschim Province, Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1