Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Membrane Peel for Lamellar Macular Holes and Related Conditions Using a New Optical Coherence Tomography Consensus Definition

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases Pub Date : 2023-12-24 DOI:10.1177/24741264231218054
Taariq K. Mohammed, John T. Thompson
{"title":"Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Membrane Peel for Lamellar Macular Holes and Related Conditions Using a New Optical Coherence Tomography Consensus Definition","authors":"Taariq K. Mohammed, John T. Thompson","doi":"10.1177/24741264231218054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To characterize the change in visual acuity (VA) in eyes treated with vitrectomy using the 2020 international consensus-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) definition of lamellar macular hole (LMH), macular pseudohole (MPH), and epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis (ERMF). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2022 of patients who had vitrectomy for symptomatic decreased VA from LMH, MPH, or ERMF performed by the same surgeon at a community hospital. Preoperative spectral domain (SD-OCT) was reviewed to classify patients using the consensus guidelines. Primary outcomes were the mean change in best-corrected VA at 3 months, 1 year, and the final postoperative examination. Results: Fifty-one patients were included, 30 with LMH, 14 with MPH, and 7 with ERMF. The VA was 20/63 at baseline, 20/62 ( P = .79) 3 months postoperatively, 20/40 ( P = .003) at 1 year, and 20/52 ( P = .10) at the final examination for LMH; 20/64, 20/50 ( P = .16), 20/40 ( P = .040), and 20/40 ( P = .02), respectively, for MPH; and 20/53, 20/50 ( P = .42), 20/30 ( P = .03), and 20/38 ( P = .04), respectively, for ERMF. Subgroup analysis showed that eyes with LMH without ellipsoid zone disruption on SD-OCT improved from 20/57 at baseline to 20/39 ( P = .01) at the final examination. Conclusions: There was no significant improvement in VA at the final postvitrectomy examination in eyes with LMH, while there was significant improvement in eyes with MPH and ERMF. This supports surgery in selected eyes with MPH and ERMF but possibly not in eyes with LMH, unless OCT shows no ellipsoid zone disruption.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264231218054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the change in visual acuity (VA) in eyes treated with vitrectomy using the 2020 international consensus-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) definition of lamellar macular hole (LMH), macular pseudohole (MPH), and epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis (ERMF). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2022 of patients who had vitrectomy for symptomatic decreased VA from LMH, MPH, or ERMF performed by the same surgeon at a community hospital. Preoperative spectral domain (SD-OCT) was reviewed to classify patients using the consensus guidelines. Primary outcomes were the mean change in best-corrected VA at 3 months, 1 year, and the final postoperative examination. Results: Fifty-one patients were included, 30 with LMH, 14 with MPH, and 7 with ERMF. The VA was 20/63 at baseline, 20/62 ( P = .79) 3 months postoperatively, 20/40 ( P = .003) at 1 year, and 20/52 ( P = .10) at the final examination for LMH; 20/64, 20/50 ( P = .16), 20/40 ( P = .040), and 20/40 ( P = .02), respectively, for MPH; and 20/53, 20/50 ( P = .42), 20/30 ( P = .03), and 20/38 ( P = .04), respectively, for ERMF. Subgroup analysis showed that eyes with LMH without ellipsoid zone disruption on SD-OCT improved from 20/57 at baseline to 20/39 ( P = .01) at the final examination. Conclusions: There was no significant improvement in VA at the final postvitrectomy examination in eyes with LMH, while there was significant improvement in eyes with MPH and ERMF. This supports surgery in selected eyes with MPH and ERMF but possibly not in eyes with LMH, unless OCT shows no ellipsoid zone disruption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新的光学相干断层扫描共识定义进行带膜剥离的玻璃体旁切术治疗鳞状黄斑孔及相关病症的结果
目的:使用基于 2020 年国际共识的光学相干断层扫描 (OCT) 对黄斑板层孔 (LMH)、黄斑假孔 (MPH) 和带眼窝裂孔的视网膜外膜 (ERMF) 的定义,描述接受玻璃体切除术治疗的眼睛视力 (VA) 变化的特征。研究方法从2000年到2022年,在一家社区医院对因LMH、MPH或ERMF引起的症状性视力下降而接受玻璃体切除术的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。对术前光谱域(SD-OCT)进行了审查,以根据共识指南对患者进行分类。主要结果是术后3个月、1年和最终检查时最佳矫正视力的平均变化。结果:共纳入 51 例患者,其中 30 例为 LMH 患者,14 例为 MPH 患者,7 例为 ERMF 患者。LMH 患者基线视力为 20/63,术后 3 个月为 20/62 ( P = .79) ,1 年为 20/40 ( P = .003) ,最终检查视力为 20/52 ( P = .10) ;LMH 患者分别为 20/64、20/50 ( P = .16)、20/40 ( P = .040) 和 20/40 ( P = .02) ;ERMF 分别为 20/53、20/50 ( P = .42)、20/30 ( P = .03) 和 20/38 ( P = .04)。亚组分析显示,SD-OCT检查中无椭圆体区破坏的LMH患者的视力从基线时的20/57提高到最终检查时的20/39 ( P = .01)。结论:LMH 眼球切除术后最终检查视力没有明显改善,而 MPH 和 ERMF 眼球切除术后视力有明显改善。这支持对部分患有 MPH 和 ERMF 的眼睛进行手术,但可能不支持对患有 LMH 的眼睛进行手术,除非 OCT 显示椭圆体区没有中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the Editor-in-Chief. Update on Retinal Drug Safety: Proceedings of the ASRS ReST Committee Webinar Part 1. Extended Intraocular Drug-Delivery Platforms for the Treatment of Retinal and Choroidal Diseases. Successful Treatment of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion With Tissue Plasminogen Activator Followed by Recurrent Retinal Ischemia 2024 Distinguished Contributor Awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1