Risk Factors of Death in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multi-Center Study From Iran

Q3 Medicine Acta medica Iranica Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.18502/acta.v61i7.14496
Mohammadreza Salehi, Mohammad-Taghi Beig Mohammadi, Seyed Hamidreza Abtahi, S. Ghazi, Abolfazl Sobati, Rama Bozorgmehr, Seyed Ali Dehgan Manshadi, Saeed Reza Jamali Siahkali, Mostafa Mohammadi, B. M. Badie, Tahereh Sajadifard, Ensiyeh Rahimi
{"title":"Risk Factors of Death in Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Multi-Center Study From Iran","authors":"Mohammadreza Salehi, Mohammad-Taghi Beig Mohammadi, Seyed Hamidreza Abtahi, S. Ghazi, Abolfazl Sobati, Rama Bozorgmehr, Seyed Ali Dehgan Manshadi, Saeed Reza Jamali Siahkali, Mostafa Mohammadi, B. M. Badie, Tahereh Sajadifard, Ensiyeh Rahimi","doi":"10.18502/acta.v61i7.14496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the improvement in COVID-19 therapeutic management the mortality of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients remains high. In this study, we determined the risk factors of death in these cases. This cross-sectional study evaluated clinical and paraclinical features of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients at the time of hospital admission until death or discharge from hospital between April and September in 2021 in three COVID-19 referral hospitals. The patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors and then the characteristics were compared. One hundred twenty-five patients (60% male, mean age 62±15.18, range 17 to 97 years old) were recruited to the study. 51(40%) survived and 74 (60%) didn’t survive. At the time of hospital admission, the vital signs were not significantly different between the survivors and non-survivors, although diarrhea was not reported in non-survivors, but reported in 9.5% of survivors (P=0.02). The mean age of non-survivors was higher (65.1±14.17 vs 56.9±15.41, P=0.003). The intubation time since the patients were admitted was not significantly different between the two groups (3.38±2.88 days vs 4.16±3.42 days, P=0.34). The mean of serum LDH and D-dimer at the time of ICU admission were significantly higher in the non-survivors (863±449 vs 613±326, P=0.01; 4081±3342 vs 542±634, P=0.009; respectively). However, the mean CRP was not significantly different between the two groups (76±66.4, 54±84.3; P=0.1). Mean APACHE-II score was higher in the non-survivors than the survivors (15 vs 13; P=0.01). Use of remdesivir, interferon beta-1a, and low dose corticosteroids were significantly higher in the survivors group (P=0.009, P=0.001, P=0.000). Success of weaning and ICU discharge among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients are probably higher in younger patients with lower D-dimmer and LDH that received remdesivir, interferon beta-1a and low dose corticosteroids, while the intubation time did not seem to play a role on patients' outcome.","PeriodicalId":6946,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Iranica","volume":"50 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Iranica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i7.14496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the improvement in COVID-19 therapeutic management the mortality of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients remains high. In this study, we determined the risk factors of death in these cases. This cross-sectional study evaluated clinical and paraclinical features of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients at the time of hospital admission until death or discharge from hospital between April and September in 2021 in three COVID-19 referral hospitals. The patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors and then the characteristics were compared. One hundred twenty-five patients (60% male, mean age 62±15.18, range 17 to 97 years old) were recruited to the study. 51(40%) survived and 74 (60%) didn’t survive. At the time of hospital admission, the vital signs were not significantly different between the survivors and non-survivors, although diarrhea was not reported in non-survivors, but reported in 9.5% of survivors (P=0.02). The mean age of non-survivors was higher (65.1±14.17 vs 56.9±15.41, P=0.003). The intubation time since the patients were admitted was not significantly different between the two groups (3.38±2.88 days vs 4.16±3.42 days, P=0.34). The mean of serum LDH and D-dimer at the time of ICU admission were significantly higher in the non-survivors (863±449 vs 613±326, P=0.01; 4081±3342 vs 542±634, P=0.009; respectively). However, the mean CRP was not significantly different between the two groups (76±66.4, 54±84.3; P=0.1). Mean APACHE-II score was higher in the non-survivors than the survivors (15 vs 13; P=0.01). Use of remdesivir, interferon beta-1a, and low dose corticosteroids were significantly higher in the survivors group (P=0.009, P=0.001, P=0.000). Success of weaning and ICU discharge among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients are probably higher in younger patients with lower D-dimmer and LDH that received remdesivir, interferon beta-1a and low dose corticosteroids, while the intubation time did not seem to play a role on patients' outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械通气的 COVID-19 患者死亡的风险因素:伊朗的一项多中心研究
尽管 COVID-19 治疗管理有所改善,但机械通气 COVID-19 患者的死亡率仍然很高。在这项研究中,我们确定了这些病例的死亡风险因素。这项横断面研究评估了三家 COVID-19 转诊医院的 COVID-19 机械通气患者从入院到死亡或出院(2021 年 4 月至 9 月)期间的临床和辅助临床特征。患者被分为存活者和非存活者,然后对其特征进行比较。研究共招募了125名患者(60%为男性,平均年龄(62±15.18)岁,年龄范围为17至97岁)。其中 51 人(40%)存活,74 人(60%)未存活。入院时,存活者和非存活者的生命体征无明显差异,但非存活者未报告腹泻,而存活者中有 9.5%报告腹泻(P=0.02)。非幸存者的平均年龄更高(65.1±14.17 vs 56.9±15.41,P=0.003)。两组患者入院后的插管时间无明显差异(3.38±2.88 天 vs 4.16±3.42天,P=0.34)。非幸存者入院时血清 LDH 和 D-二聚体的平均值明显高于幸存者(分别为 863±449 vs 613±326,P=0.01;4081±3342 vs 542±634,P=0.009)。然而,两组患者的平均 CRP 无明显差异(76±66.4,54±84.3;P=0.1)。非幸存者的平均 APACHE-II 评分高于幸存者(15 vs 13;P=0.01)。幸存者组使用雷米替韦、β-1a 干扰素和小剂量皮质类固醇的比例明显更高(P=0.009、P=0.001、P=0.000)。在接受雷米替韦、β-1a 干扰素和小剂量皮质类固醇治疗的较年轻、D-二聚体和 LDH 较低的 COVID-19 机械通气患者中,断气和出 ICU 的成功率可能较高,而插管时间似乎对患者的预后没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Iranica
Acta medica Iranica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: ACTA MEDICA IRANICA (p. ISSN 0044-6025; e. ISSN: 1735-9694) is the official journal of the Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The journal is the oldest scientific medical journal of the country, which has been published from 1960 onward in English language. Although it had been published quarterly in the past, the journal has been published bimonthly (6 issues per year) from the year 2004. Acta Medica Iranica it is an international journal with multidisciplinary scope which publishes original research papers, review articles, case reports, and letters to the editor from all over the world. The journal has a wide scope and allows scientists, clinicians, and academic members to publish their original works in this field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gestational Hypertension on Neonatal Hemoglobin Level A Review on Novel Methods of Pharmacology Teaching Concerning Iranian Academic Context Transcatheter Closure of a Huge Congenital Coronary-Cameral Fistula With Amplatzer Occluder Erythrocyte Antioxidants and Hexokinase Activity Alterations in CCl4-Induced Cirrhotic Rats Through Naltrexone Treatment Upright Versus Recumbent Position in the Second Stage of Labor for Women With Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1