Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1177/24741264231216795
Tuan Tran, Henry Chen, Bonnie He, D. Albiani, A. Kirker, A. Merkur, David Maberley, Zaid N Mammo
{"title":"Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy","authors":"Tuan Tran, Henry Chen, Bonnie He, D. Albiani, A. Kirker, A. Merkur, David Maberley, Zaid N Mammo","doi":"10.1177/24741264231216795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes that had secondary scleral buckle (SB) surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective study, performed over a 12-year period, comprised patients who had secondary SB procedures after failed primary PR. Clinical parameters (eg, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], lens status, macula status, details of RRD and subretinal fluid) were assessed at presentation, before additional procedures, and at follow-up (6 months, 1 year, and last visit). Statistical comparisons were made using Brown-Forsythe and Welch analysis of variance tests, with significance levels set at P < .05. Results: Fifty-four eyes with adequate follow-up were included. Forty-four (81.5%) of 54 eyes had successful retinal reattachment with secondary SB alone. The remaining eyes had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients presenting with macula-on RRD who had successful secondary SB had no statistically significant change in BCVA from baseline (mean final logMAR 0.23 ± 0.25 [Snellen 20/34]; P = .999). There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA in patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had successful secondary SB (mean final logMAR 0.32 ± 0.36 [20/42]; P < .001 and mean change in logMAR −1.06 ± 0.85). Ten patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had failed secondary SB had a significant improvement in the final BCVA (mean final logMAR 0.22 ± 0.28 [20/33]; P = .044), despite the need for an additional PPV to achieve reattachment. Conclusions: Secondary SB remains a good option for RRD repair after unsuccessful PR and may avoid the need for PPV.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264231216795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes that had secondary scleral buckle (SB) surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective study, performed over a 12-year period, comprised patients who had secondary SB procedures after failed primary PR. Clinical parameters (eg, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], lens status, macula status, details of RRD and subretinal fluid) were assessed at presentation, before additional procedures, and at follow-up (6 months, 1 year, and last visit). Statistical comparisons were made using Brown-Forsythe and Welch analysis of variance tests, with significance levels set at P < .05. Results: Fifty-four eyes with adequate follow-up were included. Forty-four (81.5%) of 54 eyes had successful retinal reattachment with secondary SB alone. The remaining eyes had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients presenting with macula-on RRD who had successful secondary SB had no statistically significant change in BCVA from baseline (mean final logMAR 0.23 ± 0.25 [Snellen 20/34]; P = .999). There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA in patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had successful secondary SB (mean final logMAR 0.32 ± 0.36 [20/42]; P < .001 and mean change in logMAR −1.06 ± 0.85). Ten patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had failed secondary SB had a significant improvement in the final BCVA (mean final logMAR 0.22 ± 0.28 [20/33]; P = .044), despite the need for an additional PPV to achieve reattachment. Conclusions: Secondary SB remains a good option for RRD repair after unsuccessful PR and may avoid the need for PPV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气动视网膜成形术失败后的巩膜扣带术后效果
目的:评估流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)气压性视网膜剥离术(PR)失败后进行二次巩膜扣带(SB)手术的眼部视觉和解剖效果。方法:这是一项历时 12 年的回顾性研究,研究对象是原发性 PR 失败后进行二次 SB 手术的患者。临床参数(例如,最佳矫正视力 [BCVA]、晶状体状态、黄斑状态、RRD 和视网膜下积液的详细情况)在就诊时、额外手术前和随访时(6 个月、1 年和最后一次就诊)进行评估。统计比较采用布朗-福赛(Brown-Forsythe)和韦尔奇(Welch)方差分析检验,显著性水平设定为 P <.05。结果:共纳入了 54 只得到充分随访的眼睛。54 眼中有 44 眼(81.5%)仅通过二次 SB 成功实现了视网膜重接。其余患者随后进行了玻璃体旁切除术(PPV)。成功进行二次 SB 的黄斑上 RRD 患者的 BCVA 与基线相比没有统计学意义上的显著变化(平均最终 logMAR 为 0.23 ± 0.25 [Snellen 20/34];P = 0.999)。在成功进行二次 SB 的黄斑脱失 RRD 患者中,BCVA 有统计学意义的明显改善(平均最终 logMAR 为 0.32 ± 0.36 [20/42]; P < 0.001,平均 logMAR 变化为 -1.06 ± 0.85)。10名二次SB失败的黄斑脱失性RRD患者的最终BCVA有显著改善(平均最终logMAR为0.22 ± 0.28 [20/33];P = .044),尽管需要额外的PPV才能实现再接合。结论:二次 SB 仍是 PR 不成功后进行 RRD 修复的良好选择,并可避免 PPV 的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors in the Management of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Biomarkers of Diabetic Macular Edema on Optical Coherence Tomography After Cataract Surgery. Morphologic Changes of Macular Choroidal Neovascularization on OCT Angiography Following Faricimab Therapy in Patients With AMD. Progressive Intramembranous Cystic Changes in Macular Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation Over 3 Years. No Optic Pit Retinoschisis (NOPIR): A Risk Factor for Glaucoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1