Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1177/24741264231216795
Tuan Tran, Henry Chen, Bonnie He, D. Albiani, A. Kirker, A. Merkur, David Maberley, Zaid N Mammo
{"title":"Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy","authors":"Tuan Tran, Henry Chen, Bonnie He, D. Albiani, A. Kirker, A. Merkur, David Maberley, Zaid N Mammo","doi":"10.1177/24741264231216795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes that had secondary scleral buckle (SB) surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective study, performed over a 12-year period, comprised patients who had secondary SB procedures after failed primary PR. Clinical parameters (eg, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], lens status, macula status, details of RRD and subretinal fluid) were assessed at presentation, before additional procedures, and at follow-up (6 months, 1 year, and last visit). Statistical comparisons were made using Brown-Forsythe and Welch analysis of variance tests, with significance levels set at P < .05. Results: Fifty-four eyes with adequate follow-up were included. Forty-four (81.5%) of 54 eyes had successful retinal reattachment with secondary SB alone. The remaining eyes had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients presenting with macula-on RRD who had successful secondary SB had no statistically significant change in BCVA from baseline (mean final logMAR 0.23 ± 0.25 [Snellen 20/34]; P = .999). There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA in patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had successful secondary SB (mean final logMAR 0.32 ± 0.36 [20/42]; P < .001 and mean change in logMAR −1.06 ± 0.85). Ten patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had failed secondary SB had a significant improvement in the final BCVA (mean final logMAR 0.22 ± 0.28 [20/33]; P = .044), despite the need for an additional PPV to achieve reattachment. Conclusions: Secondary SB remains a good option for RRD repair after unsuccessful PR and may avoid the need for PPV.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264231216795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes that had secondary scleral buckle (SB) surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective study, performed over a 12-year period, comprised patients who had secondary SB procedures after failed primary PR. Clinical parameters (eg, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], lens status, macula status, details of RRD and subretinal fluid) were assessed at presentation, before additional procedures, and at follow-up (6 months, 1 year, and last visit). Statistical comparisons were made using Brown-Forsythe and Welch analysis of variance tests, with significance levels set at P < .05. Results: Fifty-four eyes with adequate follow-up were included. Forty-four (81.5%) of 54 eyes had successful retinal reattachment with secondary SB alone. The remaining eyes had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients presenting with macula-on RRD who had successful secondary SB had no statistically significant change in BCVA from baseline (mean final logMAR 0.23 ± 0.25 [Snellen 20/34]; P = .999). There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA in patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had successful secondary SB (mean final logMAR 0.32 ± 0.36 [20/42]; P < .001 and mean change in logMAR −1.06 ± 0.85). Ten patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had failed secondary SB had a significant improvement in the final BCVA (mean final logMAR 0.22 ± 0.28 [20/33]; P = .044), despite the need for an additional PPV to achieve reattachment. Conclusions: Secondary SB remains a good option for RRD repair after unsuccessful PR and may avoid the need for PPV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气动视网膜成形术失败后的巩膜扣带术后效果
目的:评估流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)气压性视网膜剥离术(PR)失败后进行二次巩膜扣带(SB)手术的眼部视觉和解剖效果。方法:这是一项历时 12 年的回顾性研究,研究对象是原发性 PR 失败后进行二次 SB 手术的患者。临床参数(例如,最佳矫正视力 [BCVA]、晶状体状态、黄斑状态、RRD 和视网膜下积液的详细情况)在就诊时、额外手术前和随访时(6 个月、1 年和最后一次就诊)进行评估。统计比较采用布朗-福赛(Brown-Forsythe)和韦尔奇(Welch)方差分析检验,显著性水平设定为 P <.05。结果:共纳入了 54 只得到充分随访的眼睛。54 眼中有 44 眼(81.5%)仅通过二次 SB 成功实现了视网膜重接。其余患者随后进行了玻璃体旁切除术(PPV)。成功进行二次 SB 的黄斑上 RRD 患者的 BCVA 与基线相比没有统计学意义上的显著变化(平均最终 logMAR 为 0.23 ± 0.25 [Snellen 20/34];P = 0.999)。在成功进行二次 SB 的黄斑脱失 RRD 患者中,BCVA 有统计学意义的明显改善(平均最终 logMAR 为 0.32 ± 0.36 [20/42]; P < 0.001,平均 logMAR 变化为 -1.06 ± 0.85)。10名二次SB失败的黄斑脱失性RRD患者的最终BCVA有显著改善(平均最终logMAR为0.22 ± 0.28 [20/33];P = .044),尽管需要额外的PPV才能实现再接合。结论:二次 SB 仍是 PR 不成功后进行 RRD 修复的良好选择,并可避免 PPV 的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Operative Times in Scleral Buckle Surgery: Influencing Factors and Cost Analysis. From the Editor-in-Chief. Clinical Profiles of Retinal Vasoproliferative Tumors. Serpiginous Choroiditis After COVID-19 Infection. Ischemic Retinopathy Associated With Mantle Cell Lymphoma-Induced Vascular Occlusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1