Validity and performance of cognitive scales in elderly patients with depression in a tertiary care hospital in Chennai

S. Malini, C. Jayakrishnaveni, Saravanakumar Palaniappan
{"title":"Validity and performance of cognitive scales in elderly patients with depression in a tertiary care hospital in Chennai","authors":"S. Malini, C. Jayakrishnaveni, Saravanakumar Palaniappan","doi":"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Late-life depression in older adults can cause reversible cognitive impairment, often resulting in pseudo-dementia. Cognitive impairment can lead to executive dysfunction, reduced flexibility, and difficulty thinking and decision-making. This study aimed to assess the validity and performance of cognitive scales in late-life depression among patients attending the outpatient department of the institute of mental health, Chennai. Methods: This prospective study included 360 patients aged >50 years who were diagnosed with depression and attended the OPD at the institute of mental health, Chennai. Baseline assessments were performed at the time of recruitment into the study (visit 1), and scheduled visits were performed every six months for two years (visits 2 to 5). Unscheduled visits were done every month, and adverse events were monitored and recorded periodically Results: Among 59 patients, 53.1% were female, 32.2% were diabetic, and 93.9% were experiencing subjective working difficulties. The Montreal cognitive assessment scale classified 51.4% as moderate, while the ADAS-cog and ACE scales classified 86% and 99.7%, respectively, as having abnormal mental status. However, a significant correlation and discrepancy between scores were observed for scales such as ACE, ADAS-cog, standardised mini-mental status examination, and Montreal cognitive assessment scale. A strong correlation was found between ACE, MMSE, MoCA, and ACE; however, FAST showed a significant negative correlation. The MoCA was strongly correlated with the MMSE, ACE, ADAS-cog, and Mini-Cog, indicating good alignment with the FAST. Conclusions: Cognitive scales strongly correlate with late-life depression in patients, suggesting an improvement in assessment, evaluation, and treatment to address cognitive deficits.","PeriodicalId":13827,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","volume":"261 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Late-life depression in older adults can cause reversible cognitive impairment, often resulting in pseudo-dementia. Cognitive impairment can lead to executive dysfunction, reduced flexibility, and difficulty thinking and decision-making. This study aimed to assess the validity and performance of cognitive scales in late-life depression among patients attending the outpatient department of the institute of mental health, Chennai. Methods: This prospective study included 360 patients aged >50 years who were diagnosed with depression and attended the OPD at the institute of mental health, Chennai. Baseline assessments were performed at the time of recruitment into the study (visit 1), and scheduled visits were performed every six months for two years (visits 2 to 5). Unscheduled visits were done every month, and adverse events were monitored and recorded periodically Results: Among 59 patients, 53.1% were female, 32.2% were diabetic, and 93.9% were experiencing subjective working difficulties. The Montreal cognitive assessment scale classified 51.4% as moderate, while the ADAS-cog and ACE scales classified 86% and 99.7%, respectively, as having abnormal mental status. However, a significant correlation and discrepancy between scores were observed for scales such as ACE, ADAS-cog, standardised mini-mental status examination, and Montreal cognitive assessment scale. A strong correlation was found between ACE, MMSE, MoCA, and ACE; however, FAST showed a significant negative correlation. The MoCA was strongly correlated with the MMSE, ACE, ADAS-cog, and Mini-Cog, indicating good alignment with the FAST. Conclusions: Cognitive scales strongly correlate with late-life depression in patients, suggesting an improvement in assessment, evaluation, and treatment to address cognitive deficits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钦奈一家三级医院老年抑郁症患者认知量表的有效性和性能
背景:老年人的晚年抑郁症可导致可逆的认知障碍,通常会造成假性痴呆。认知障碍可导致执行功能障碍、灵活性降低以及思考和决策困难。本研究旨在评估钦奈精神健康研究所门诊部就诊的晚年抑郁症患者认知量表的有效性和表现。研究方法这项前瞻性研究包括 360 名年龄大于 50 岁、被诊断为抑郁症并在金奈精神健康研究所门诊部就诊的患者。基线评估在研究招募时进行(第 1 次就诊),两年内每六个月进行一次定期就诊(第 2 次至第 5 次就诊)。每月进行一次不定期回访,并定期监测和记录不良事件:59 名患者中,53.1% 为女性,32.2% 患有糖尿病,93.9% 存在主观工作困难。蒙特利尔认知评估量表将 51.4% 的患者归类为中度,而 ADAS-cog 和 ACE 量表分别将 86% 和 99.7% 的患者归类为精神状态异常。然而,在 ACE、ADAS-cog、标准化小型精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估量表等量表中,均观察到得分之间存在明显的相关性和差异。在 ACE、MMSE、MoCA 和 ACE 之间发现了很强的相关性;然而,FAST 则显示出明显的负相关。MoCA与MMSE、ACE、ADAS-cog和Mini-Cog之间有很强的相关性,表明与FAST有很好的一致性。结论认知量表与患者的晚年抑郁密切相关,这表明在评估、评价和治疗认知缺陷方面需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of gender on outcome of adult cardiac surgery Congenital absence of the appendix in a 21-year-old male with clinical presentation of acute appendicitis: a diagnostic challenge at Prince Ali Military Hospital Human immunodeficiency virus infected patient with decreased of consciousness, what do we think? Impact of body mass index on outcome of adult cardiac surgery Exploring the seasonal impact on appendectomy: incidence, patterns, predictors, and healthcare implication of appendectomy at Prince Ali military hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1