A novel flexible fixation technique for Lisfranc injuries: clinical outcomes and radiographic follow-up

Eitan M. Ingall, F. Raduan, John Y. Kwon
{"title":"A novel flexible fixation technique for Lisfranc injuries: clinical outcomes and radiographic follow-up","authors":"Eitan M. Ingall, F. Raduan, John Y. Kwon","doi":"10.30795/jfootankle.2023.v17.1723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of this investigation is to present the follow-up results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a continuous series of surgically managed Lisfranc injuries whose constructs included a novel technique. Methods: Our billing database was retrospectively queried by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to identify all Lisfranc injuries managed operatively between 2018 and 2021. Basic demographic data were collected. Clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed. Patients were contacted prospectively to complete the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement – Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, and PROMIS Depression surveys. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Sixteen patients were included. While all patients underwent flexible fixation (FF), nine of them underwent concomitant open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and seven, concomitant primary arthrodesis. Median radiographic and PROMs follow-up time was 7.3 months (IQR 4.4–11.6) and 25.8 (IQR 9.5–32.4), respectively. All fusion patients had evidence of joint fusion, and 8/9 of ORIF patients maintained articular congruity without evidence of arthritis at final follow-up. Median PROMs were 85 (64.75–93.5), 53.1 (49.7–57.75), 45.7 (37.7–51.3), and 46 (43.3–52.28) for the FAAM-ADL, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Pain Intensity, and PROMIS Depression scores, respectively. Conclusion: The novel FF technique proposed for residual tarsometatarsal subluxation in Lisfranc injuries appears to be safe and effective, with good PROMs at two-year follow-up and low complication rates, obviating the need for hardware removal. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutics Studies; Cases Series.","PeriodicalId":436014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Foot & Ankle","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2023.v17.1723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this investigation is to present the follow-up results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a continuous series of surgically managed Lisfranc injuries whose constructs included a novel technique. Methods: Our billing database was retrospectively queried by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to identify all Lisfranc injuries managed operatively between 2018 and 2021. Basic demographic data were collected. Clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed. Patients were contacted prospectively to complete the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement – Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, and PROMIS Depression surveys. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Sixteen patients were included. While all patients underwent flexible fixation (FF), nine of them underwent concomitant open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and seven, concomitant primary arthrodesis. Median radiographic and PROMs follow-up time was 7.3 months (IQR 4.4–11.6) and 25.8 (IQR 9.5–32.4), respectively. All fusion patients had evidence of joint fusion, and 8/9 of ORIF patients maintained articular congruity without evidence of arthritis at final follow-up. Median PROMs were 85 (64.75–93.5), 53.1 (49.7–57.75), 45.7 (37.7–51.3), and 46 (43.3–52.28) for the FAAM-ADL, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Pain Intensity, and PROMIS Depression scores, respectively. Conclusion: The novel FF technique proposed for residual tarsometatarsal subluxation in Lisfranc injuries appears to be safe and effective, with good PROMs at two-year follow-up and low complication rates, obviating the need for hardware removal. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutics Studies; Cases Series.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于治疗 Lisfranc 损伤的新型柔性固定技术:临床疗效和影像学随访
研究目的本研究的目的是介绍一系列连续手术治疗的 Lisfranc 损伤的随访结果和患者报告的结果指标(PROMs),这些损伤的构建包括一项新技术。研究方法通过当前程序术语(CPT)代码对我们的账单数据库进行回顾性查询,以确定 2018 年至 2021 年期间所有经手术治疗的 Lisfranc 损伤。收集了基本人口统计学数据。对临床笔记和X光片进行了审查。前瞻性地联系了患者,让他们完成足踝能力测量-日常生活活动(FAAM-ADL)、患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛强度、PROMIS疼痛干扰和PROMIS抑郁调查。计算了描述性统计数字。结果共纳入 16 名患者。所有患者均接受了柔性固定术(FF),其中九人同时接受了开放复位内固定术(ORIF),七人同时接受了原发性关节固定术。中位X光片和PROMs随访时间分别为7.3个月(IQR 4.4-11.6)和25.8个月(IQR 9.5-32.4)。所有融合患者都有关节融合的证据,8/9 的 ORIF 患者在最终随访时保持了关节的一致性,没有关节炎的证据。FAAM-ADL、PROMIS疼痛干扰、PROMIS疼痛强度和PROMIS抑郁评分的PROM中位数分别为85(64.75-93.5)、53.1(49.7-57.75)、45.7(37.7-51.3)和46(43.3-52.28)。结论针对 Lisfranc 损伤中的残余跖跗关节脱位提出的新型 FF 技术似乎是安全有效的,在两年的随访中具有良好的 PROMs 和较低的并发症发生率,从而避免了拆除硬件的需要。证据等级 IV;治疗研究;病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fourth generation minimally invasive osteotomy with rotational control for hallux valgus: a case series Progressive collapsing foot deformity: how to use new knowledge in developing countries Correlation between the region of interest in digital radiography, Hounsfield units, and histological maturation on Wistar rats submitted to tibial fracture ESTUDO COMPARATIVO DE MÉTODOS DE FIXAÇÃO DA OSTEOTOMIA DE CHEVRON NA CIRURGIA PERCUTÂNEA DO HÁLUX VALGO Translation of AOFAS Hallux Metatarsophalangeal- Interphalangeal Scale into Portuguese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1