Role of Some Food by Product Extracts Compared to Silymarin as Protective Agents against Acute Liver Injury in Paracetamol Overdose-Exposed Rats

Wafaa Gaballah, Asmaa Faramawy, Samah El-Hashash
{"title":"Role of Some Food by Product Extracts Compared to Silymarin as Protective Agents against Acute Liver Injury in Paracetamol Overdose-Exposed Rats","authors":"Wafaa Gaballah, Asmaa Faramawy, Samah El-Hashash","doi":"10.21608/eajbsc.2023.330658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In paracetamol (PCM) overdose-exposed rats, the hepato-protective properties of ethanolic extracts from grape seeds and peanut skins (GSEE and PSEE, respectively) were compared to silymarin in this study. The total amount of phenolic and flavonoids as well as the ability to scavenge radical DPPH of GSEE and PSEE were measured. Twenty adult male albino rats were split evenly into five groups for the in vivo evaluation; including the control group (GI), while PCM treated group (GII) got paracetamol once orally for 14 days at a dosage of 640 mg/kg/day, with no protective treatment. Silymarin (50 mg /kg /day), and 200 mg /kg /day of either GSEE or PSEE were given concurrently with PCM to GIII, GIV and GV, respectively. PCM overdose led to a significant elevation in the activities of transaminases and alkaline phosphatase (84.00±10.64, 396.00±49.44, and 579.67±72.00 U/L versus 44.00±5.72, 178.00±22.09, and 322.0±40.58 U/L in control group), along with an obvious decline in serum proteins. In the liver, the lipid profile was disrupted associated with a marked elevation in oxidative and inflammation markers, which was further confirmed by histological examination. These disorders were alleviated by the administration of food waste extracts. Even while PSEE showed a little increase in total phenolic, flavonoids and DPPH radical scavenging ability (604.45, 542.05, and 618.59 versus 583.70 mg gallic acid equivalent, 503.80 mg catechin equivalent, and 550.44 mg Trolox equivalent, respectively/g GSEE), GSEE was the nearest treatment when compared to silymarin. This study suggests GSEE and PSEE as alternative therapies for paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity.","PeriodicalId":505538,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular Biology","volume":"6 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsc.2023.330658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In paracetamol (PCM) overdose-exposed rats, the hepato-protective properties of ethanolic extracts from grape seeds and peanut skins (GSEE and PSEE, respectively) were compared to silymarin in this study. The total amount of phenolic and flavonoids as well as the ability to scavenge radical DPPH of GSEE and PSEE were measured. Twenty adult male albino rats were split evenly into five groups for the in vivo evaluation; including the control group (GI), while PCM treated group (GII) got paracetamol once orally for 14 days at a dosage of 640 mg/kg/day, with no protective treatment. Silymarin (50 mg /kg /day), and 200 mg /kg /day of either GSEE or PSEE were given concurrently with PCM to GIII, GIV and GV, respectively. PCM overdose led to a significant elevation in the activities of transaminases and alkaline phosphatase (84.00±10.64, 396.00±49.44, and 579.67±72.00 U/L versus 44.00±5.72, 178.00±22.09, and 322.0±40.58 U/L in control group), along with an obvious decline in serum proteins. In the liver, the lipid profile was disrupted associated with a marked elevation in oxidative and inflammation markers, which was further confirmed by histological examination. These disorders were alleviated by the administration of food waste extracts. Even while PSEE showed a little increase in total phenolic, flavonoids and DPPH radical scavenging ability (604.45, 542.05, and 618.59 versus 583.70 mg gallic acid equivalent, 503.80 mg catechin equivalent, and 550.44 mg Trolox equivalent, respectively/g GSEE), GSEE was the nearest treatment when compared to silymarin. This study suggests GSEE and PSEE as alternative therapies for paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与水飞蓟素相比,一些食品副产品提取物对扑热息痛过量暴露大鼠急性肝损伤的保护作用
本研究比较了葡萄籽乙醇提取物(GSEE)和花生皮乙醇提取物(PSEE)与水飞蓟素对扑热息痛(PCM)过量暴露大鼠的肝脏保护特性。研究测定了 GSEE 和 PSEE 的酚类和类黄酮总量以及清除自由基 DPPH 的能力。将 20 只成年雄性白化大鼠平均分成 5 组进行体内评估,其中包括对照组(GI),而 PCM 处理组(GII)则口服扑热息痛一次,连续 14 天,剂量为 640 毫克/千克/天,不进行任何保护性处理。GIII、GIV 和 GV 在服用 PCM 的同时,分别服用水飞蓟素(50 毫克/千克/天)和 200 毫克/千克/天的 GSEE 或 PSEE。PCM 过量会导致转氨酶和碱性磷酸酶活性显著升高(84.00±10.64、396.00±49.44 和 579.67±72.00 U/L 与对照组的 44.00±5.72、178.00±22.09 和 322.0±40.58 U/L 相比),同时血清蛋白明显下降。在肝脏中,脂质分布紊乱,氧化和炎症标志物明显升高,组织学检查进一步证实了这一点。施用厨余提取物后,这些病症都得到了缓解。尽管 PSEE 的总酚、类黄酮和 DPPH 自由基清除能力略有提高(604.45、542.05 和 618.59 与 583.70 毫克没食子酸当量、503.80 毫克儿茶素当量和 550.44 毫克三氧化碳当量/克 GSEE 相比),但与水飞蓟素相比,GSEE 是最接近的处理方法。本研究建议将 GSEE 和 PSEE 作为扑热息痛引起的肝毒性的替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Carbon-Nanotube Field-Effect-Transistor (CNT-FET)-Based Nano-Biosensors on The Diagnosis of The Disease Caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Cytotoxicity and Mito-depressive Effect of Synthetic Lemon Flavour Food Dye on Allium Cepa Root Tips Psychological and Socio-Religious Effects of Ramadan Fasting Among Healthy Non-Smoker Adults Delineation of Genomic Variants/Covariants of SARS-CoV-2, Their Frequencies, and Cooccurrence in Saudi Arabia in Context with Neighboring Countries First Report of Biscogniauxis mediterranae As Endophytic Fungi Associated with Quercus infectoria from A Mountainous Area In Kurdistan Region, Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1