Comparison of the gut microbiota of college students with the nine balanced and unbalanced traditional Chinese medicine constitutions and its potential application in fecal microbiota transplantation

Qinhong Huang, Lihui Yang, Guannan Cai, Yongdie Huang, Shian Zhang, Zhenwei Ye, Jing Yang, Chuhui Gao, Jiaxuan Lai, Lyu Lin, Jihui Wang, Ting Liu
{"title":"Comparison of the gut microbiota of college students with the nine balanced and unbalanced traditional Chinese medicine constitutions and its potential application in fecal microbiota transplantation","authors":"Qinhong Huang, Lihui Yang, Guannan Cai, Yongdie Huang, Shian Zhang, Zhenwei Ye, Jing Yang, Chuhui Gao, Jiaxuan Lai, Lyu Lin, Jihui Wang, Ting Liu","doi":"10.3389/frmbi.2023.1292273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been tested for the prevention and treatment of various intestinal and extra-intestinal diseases, but its efficacy is not stable, which may be due to the lack of an optimized method for screening high-quality donors. The low efficiency and high cost of donor screening are also obstacles to the clinical application of FMT. In this study, we tested the efficiency of the constitution theory of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in screening high-quality FMT donors. College student volunteers were sorted into either the balanced TCM constitution (BC) or unbalanced TCM constitution (UBC) groups, with the latter group comprising eight different constitution types, and the gut microbiota profiles of each UBC were compared with that of BC. Subsequently, the success rates of the qualified donors of BC and UBC volunteers were compared. Finally, the anti-obesity effect of FMT, obtained using the fecal microbiota of BC and UBC donors, was tested on mice with high fat diet-induced obesity. The results showed that the gut microbiota of BC and UBC volunteers were significantly different. There was a higher proportion of qualified FMT donors in the BC volunteer group than in the UBC volunteer group. Moreover, the experiment in mice showed that the fecal microbiota of BC and UBC volunteers conferred different anti-obesity effects. Overall, TCM constitution could be a reference for FMT practice. Our study presents a new idea, namely, using TCM constitution theory to efficiently screen high-quality FMT donors.","PeriodicalId":73089,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in microbiomes","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in microbiomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frmbi.2023.1292273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been tested for the prevention and treatment of various intestinal and extra-intestinal diseases, but its efficacy is not stable, which may be due to the lack of an optimized method for screening high-quality donors. The low efficiency and high cost of donor screening are also obstacles to the clinical application of FMT. In this study, we tested the efficiency of the constitution theory of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in screening high-quality FMT donors. College student volunteers were sorted into either the balanced TCM constitution (BC) or unbalanced TCM constitution (UBC) groups, with the latter group comprising eight different constitution types, and the gut microbiota profiles of each UBC were compared with that of BC. Subsequently, the success rates of the qualified donors of BC and UBC volunteers were compared. Finally, the anti-obesity effect of FMT, obtained using the fecal microbiota of BC and UBC donors, was tested on mice with high fat diet-induced obesity. The results showed that the gut microbiota of BC and UBC volunteers were significantly different. There was a higher proportion of qualified FMT donors in the BC volunteer group than in the UBC volunteer group. Moreover, the experiment in mice showed that the fecal microbiota of BC and UBC volunteers conferred different anti-obesity effects. Overall, TCM constitution could be a reference for FMT practice. Our study presents a new idea, namely, using TCM constitution theory to efficiently screen high-quality FMT donors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中医九种平衡和不平衡体质大学生肠道微生物群的比较及其在粪便微生物群移植中的潜在应用
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)已被用于预防和治疗各种肠道和肠道外疾病,但其疗效并不稳定,这可能是由于缺乏筛选优质供体的优化方法。供体筛选的低效率和高成本也是 FMT 临床应用的障碍。在本研究中,我们测试了中医体质理论在筛选高质量 FMT 供体中的效率。我们将大学生志愿者分为中医体质平衡组(BC)和中医体质不平衡组(UBC),后者包括八种不同的体质类型,并比较了每种 UBC 与 BC 的肠道微生物群谱。随后,比较了 BC 和 UBC 志愿者合格供体的成功率。最后,利用 BC 和 UBC 捐赠者的粪便微生物群,在高脂饮食诱发肥胖的小鼠身上测试了 FMT 的抗肥胖效果。结果显示,BC 和 UBC 志愿者的肠道微生物群存在显著差异。在 BC 志愿者组中,合格的 FMT 捐赠者比例高于 UBC 志愿者组。此外,小鼠实验表明,BC 和 UBC 志愿者的粪便微生物群具有不同的抗肥胖作用。总之,中医体质可作为 FMT 实践的参考。我们的研究提出了一个新思路,即利用中医体质理论有效筛选高质量的 FMT 供体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial resistance burden, and mechanisms of its emergence in gut microbiomes of Indian population Microbiome variations induced by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol predict weight reduction in obese mice Recent advances in fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection-associated diarrhea after kidney transplantation Balancing water conservation and health: do water-saving showerheads impact the microbes we breathe in during showering? Association of resistome abundance with hyperuricaemia in elderly individuals: a metagenomics study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1