Radiotherapy intensification for atypical and malignant meningiomas: a systematic review

S. Gaito, L. Goyal, R. Rieu, A. France, N. Burnet, C. Barker, S. Pan, R. Colaco, G. Minniti, F. Roncaroli, E. Smith, M. Aznar, G. Whitfield
{"title":"Radiotherapy intensification for atypical and malignant meningiomas: a systematic review","authors":"S. Gaito, L. Goyal, R. Rieu, A. France, N. Burnet, C. Barker, S. Pan, R. Colaco, G. Minniti, F. Roncaroli, E. Smith, M. Aznar, G. Whitfield","doi":"10.1093/nop/npad077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outcomes of non-benign (WHO Grade 2 and 3) meningiomas are suboptimal and radiotherapy (RT) dose intensification strategies have been investigated. The purpose of this review is to report on clinical practice and outcomes with particular attention to RT doses and techniques. The PICO criteria (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) were used to frame the research question, directed at outlining the clinical outcomes in patients with G2-3 meningiomas treated with radiotherapy (RT). The same search strategy was run in Embase and MEDLINE and, after deduplication, returned 1807 records. These were manually screened for relevance and 25 were included. Tumour outcomes and toxicities are not uniformly reported in the selected studies since different endpoints and time points have been used by different authors. Many risk factors for worse outcomes are described, the most common being suboptimal RT. This includes no or delayed RT, low doses, older techniques. A positive association between RT dose and progression-free survival (PFS) has been highlighted by analysing the studies in this review (10/25) that report the same endpoint (5y-PFS). This literature review has shown that standard practice RT leads to suboptimal tumour control rates in G2-3 meningiomas, with a significant proportion of disease recurring after a relatively short follow-up. Randomised controlled trials are needed in this setting to define the optimal RT approach. Given the increasing data to suggest a benefit of higher RT doses for high-risk meningiomas, novel RT technologies with highly conformal dose distributions are preferential to achieve optimal target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing.","PeriodicalId":506567,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-Oncology Practice","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outcomes of non-benign (WHO Grade 2 and 3) meningiomas are suboptimal and radiotherapy (RT) dose intensification strategies have been investigated. The purpose of this review is to report on clinical practice and outcomes with particular attention to RT doses and techniques. The PICO criteria (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) were used to frame the research question, directed at outlining the clinical outcomes in patients with G2-3 meningiomas treated with radiotherapy (RT). The same search strategy was run in Embase and MEDLINE and, after deduplication, returned 1807 records. These were manually screened for relevance and 25 were included. Tumour outcomes and toxicities are not uniformly reported in the selected studies since different endpoints and time points have been used by different authors. Many risk factors for worse outcomes are described, the most common being suboptimal RT. This includes no or delayed RT, low doses, older techniques. A positive association between RT dose and progression-free survival (PFS) has been highlighted by analysing the studies in this review (10/25) that report the same endpoint (5y-PFS). This literature review has shown that standard practice RT leads to suboptimal tumour control rates in G2-3 meningiomas, with a significant proportion of disease recurring after a relatively short follow-up. Randomised controlled trials are needed in this setting to define the optimal RT approach. Given the increasing data to suggest a benefit of higher RT doses for high-risk meningiomas, novel RT technologies with highly conformal dose distributions are preferential to achieve optimal target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非典型和恶性脑膜瘤的放疗强化:系统性综述
非良性(WHO 2 级和 3 级)脑膜瘤的治疗效果并不理想,因此对放射治疗(RT)剂量强化策略进行了研究。本综述旨在报告临床实践和疗效,尤其关注 RT 剂量和技术。 研究采用PICO标准(人群、干预、比较和结果)来确定研究问题,旨在概述G2-3脑膜瘤患者接受放射治疗(RT)后的临床结果。在Embase和MEDLINE中采用了相同的检索策略,经过重复删除后,共检索到1807条记录。对这些记录进行了相关性人工筛选,最终纳入了 25 条记录。 由于不同的作者采用了不同的终点和时间点,因此所选研究中对肿瘤预后和毒性反应的报告并不一致。研究中描述了许多导致较差结果的风险因素,其中最常见的是次优 RT。这包括未使用或延迟使用 RT、低剂量、技术较老。通过分析本综述中报告相同终点(5 年无进展生存期)的研究(10/25),我们发现 RT 剂量与无进展生存期(PFS)之间存在正相关。 本次文献综述显示,标准RT疗法会导致G2-3脑膜瘤的肿瘤控制率达不到理想水平,相当一部分患者会在相对较短的随访时间后复发。在这种情况下,需要进行随机对照试验,以确定最佳的 RT 方法。鉴于越来越多的数据表明高风险脑膜瘤可从更高的RT剂量中获益,因此,具有高度适形剂量分布的新型RT技术是实现最佳靶点覆盖和危险器官(OARs)保护的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights from GoFundMe Posts: Analyzing GoFundMe Financial Aid Requests from Brain Tumor Patients in Ontario, Canada Simulation-Based Caregiving Skills Training for Family Members of High-Grade Glioma Patients Inequalities in access to neuro-oncology supportive care and rehabilitation: a survey of healthcare professionals’ perspectives Clinician Perspectives on Integrating Neuro-oncology and Palliative Care for Patients with High-Grade Glioma Burnout and career satisfaction in young neuro-oncology investigators: results of the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) young investigator survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1