Detecting Fraud in Financial Statements Through the Fraud Triangle Model: The Case of Indonesia

Agoestina Mappadang
{"title":"Detecting Fraud in Financial Statements Through the Fraud Triangle Model: The Case of Indonesia","authors":"Agoestina Mappadang","doi":"10.21532/apfjournal.v8i2.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Referring to ACFE Global’s in the year 2016 until 2018 RTTN, fraudulent financial statement detection is a typical frequency occurrence and gets a large median loss. This study’s purpose is to determine the perspective of the fraud triangle as measured by three elements where fraud occurs in financial statements and is proxied by earnings management. The population is chosen from banking industries that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2020. The research sample was 25 banks based on the purposive sampling method as criteria sampling. Objects found are 75 objects and hypothesis testing used binary logistic regression. The results show that the fraud triangle perspective simultaneously affects fraud on financial statements. But, partially only pressure factors as proxied by return on assets were shown to be significantly positive, while other pressure factors were financial stability, external pressures, the nature of the industry, effective monitoring with the measure by the independent commissioner, and the rationalization factor, measured by total accruals (TACC) have no significant. The fraud triangle measurement is only used in this research to detect fraud. In addition, very limited sample use because it only covers 4 years so it cannot provide sufficient confidence. It is important to ascertain and analyze fraud factors that can affect financial reporting to minimize fraud that occurs. Management must obtain the widest possible information for making the right decisions so that the triggers of fraud can be minimized and eliminated","PeriodicalId":251943,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Fraud Journal","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Fraud Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i2.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Referring to ACFE Global’s in the year 2016 until 2018 RTTN, fraudulent financial statement detection is a typical frequency occurrence and gets a large median loss. This study’s purpose is to determine the perspective of the fraud triangle as measured by three elements where fraud occurs in financial statements and is proxied by earnings management. The population is chosen from banking industries that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2020. The research sample was 25 banks based on the purposive sampling method as criteria sampling. Objects found are 75 objects and hypothesis testing used binary logistic regression. The results show that the fraud triangle perspective simultaneously affects fraud on financial statements. But, partially only pressure factors as proxied by return on assets were shown to be significantly positive, while other pressure factors were financial stability, external pressures, the nature of the industry, effective monitoring with the measure by the independent commissioner, and the rationalization factor, measured by total accruals (TACC) have no significant. The fraud triangle measurement is only used in this research to detect fraud. In addition, very limited sample use because it only covers 4 years so it cannot provide sufficient confidence. It is important to ascertain and analyze fraud factors that can affect financial reporting to minimize fraud that occurs. Management must obtain the widest possible information for making the right decisions so that the triggers of fraud can be minimized and eliminated
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过欺诈三角模型检测财务报表中的欺诈行为:印度尼西亚案例
根据 ACFE Global 在 2016 年至 2018 年的 RTTN,财务报表舞弊检测是一种典型的频繁发生的情况,并会造成较大的中位数损失。本研究的目的是确定欺诈三角的视角,该三角由三个要素衡量,其中欺诈发生在财务报表中,并以收益管理为代表。研究对象选自 2018-2020 年在印尼证券交易所上市的银行业。研究样本为 25 家银行,基于目的抽样法作为标准抽样。发现对象为75个,假设检验采用二元逻辑回归法。结果显示,舞弊三角视角同时影响财务报表舞弊。但是,只有以资产收益率为代表的压力因素部分显示出显著的正向影响,而其他压力因素包括财务稳定性、外部压力、行业性质、独立专员衡量的有效监督,以及以应计总额(TACC)衡量的合理化因素均无显著影响。欺诈三角衡量标准在本研究中仅用于发现欺诈行为。此外,由于样本使用非常有限,只涵盖了 4 年,因此无法提供足够的置信度。确定并分析可能影响财务报告的舞弊因素,对最大限度地减少舞弊的发生非常重要。管理层必须获得尽可能广泛的信息,以便做出正确的决策,从而最大限度地减少和消除舞弊的诱因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Fraud Patterns in Islamic Banking Transactions: Strategies and Implementation of Prevention The Challenges of Anticorruption Education in Universities Evaluating the Impact of Digital Transformation and Sustainability Strategies on Earnings Management: A Text Mining Approach Corporate Governance as a Detector of Financial Statement Fraud: Systematic Literature Review Fraud Prevention in the Village Fund System: A Case Study in Marga Mulya Village, Tangerang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1