Tantangan Pemberian Kewenangan Bagi Penyidik Pejabat Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Kehutanan Sumatera Barat Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Tantangan Pemberian, Kewenangan Bagi, Penyidik Pejabat, Pegawai Negeri, Sipil Kehutanan, Sumatera Barat, Pada Tindak, Pidana Pencucian, Uang Annisa’un, Rasiqah
{"title":"Tantangan Pemberian Kewenangan Bagi Penyidik Pejabat Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Kehutanan Sumatera Barat Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang","authors":"Tantangan Pemberian, Kewenangan Bagi, Penyidik Pejabat, Pegawai Negeri, Sipil Kehutanan, Sumatera Barat, Pada Tindak, Pidana Pencucian, Uang Annisa’un, Rasiqah","doi":"10.25077/delicti.v.1.i.2.p.15-25.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering (AML Law) serves as the cornerstone of anti-money laundering enforcement in Indonesia today, but it still falls short in accommodating the needs of money laundering law enforcement. Explanation of Article 74 of the AML Law limits the role of criminal investigators solely to the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Police, the Prosecutor's Office, Customs, and Tax Authorities. This explanation of Article 74 contradicts the AML Law. This situation leaves the Environmental and Forestry Crime Investigators (PPNS Kehutanan) without the authority to investigate money laundering cases in the forestry sector and hampers efforts to combat money laundering. Ultimately, Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021 breathed new life into money laundering investigations by broadening the definition of investigators and granting authority to PPNS Kehutanan to handle money laundering cases. Based on this research, the author concludes that following Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021, PPNS in the forestry sector has the authority to investigate cases of money laundering. The authority held by PPNS Kehutanan in conducting money laundering investigations includes the power to delay transactions, the power to request information about wealth from the reporter, the power to seize assets, and the power to block assets. In West Sumatra, the investigation of money laundering in the forestry sector is assigned to PPNS of the Provincial Forestry Service and PPNS of the Directorate General of Law Enforcement and Forest Protection (Gakkum LHK). These two institutions coordinate to handle all forestry crimes, including money laundering. Furthermore, coordination is also carried out with the National Police (POLRI) and the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in resolving money laundering cases.","PeriodicalId":504464,"journal":{"name":"Delicti : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi","volume":"118 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delicti : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/delicti.v.1.i.2.p.15-25.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering (AML Law) serves as the cornerstone of anti-money laundering enforcement in Indonesia today, but it still falls short in accommodating the needs of money laundering law enforcement. Explanation of Article 74 of the AML Law limits the role of criminal investigators solely to the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Police, the Prosecutor's Office, Customs, and Tax Authorities. This explanation of Article 74 contradicts the AML Law. This situation leaves the Environmental and Forestry Crime Investigators (PPNS Kehutanan) without the authority to investigate money laundering cases in the forestry sector and hampers efforts to combat money laundering. Ultimately, Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021 breathed new life into money laundering investigations by broadening the definition of investigators and granting authority to PPNS Kehutanan to handle money laundering cases. Based on this research, the author concludes that following Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021, PPNS in the forestry sector has the authority to investigate cases of money laundering. The authority held by PPNS Kehutanan in conducting money laundering investigations includes the power to delay transactions, the power to request information about wealth from the reporter, the power to seize assets, and the power to block assets. In West Sumatra, the investigation of money laundering in the forestry sector is assigned to PPNS of the Provincial Forestry Service and PPNS of the Directorate General of Law Enforcement and Forest Protection (Gakkum LHK). These two institutions coordinate to handle all forestry crimes, including money laundering. Furthermore, coordination is also carried out with the National Police (POLRI) and the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in resolving money laundering cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在洗钱犯罪中为西苏门答腊林业公务员(PPNS)调查员提供授权所面临的挑战
2010 年第 8 号《防止和根除洗钱法》(《反洗钱法》)是当今印度尼西亚反洗钱执法工作的基石,但仍无法满足洗钱执法工作的需要。反洗钱法》第 74 条的解释将刑事调查人员的职责仅限于国家缉毒署 (BNN)、根除腐败委员会 (KPK)、警方、检察官办公室、海关和税务机关。对第 74 条的解释与《反洗钱法》相矛盾。这种情况使得环境和林业犯罪调查员(PPNS Kehutanan)无权调查林业部门的洗钱案件,阻碍了打击洗钱的工作。最终,宪法法院第 15/PUU-XIX/2021 号决定扩大了调查员的定义,并授权 PPNS Kehutanan 处理洗钱案件,为洗钱调查注入了新的活力。根据这项研究,作者得出结论,根据宪法法院第 15/PUU-XIX/2021 号决定,林业部门的 PPNS 有权调查洗钱案件。PPNS Kehutanan 在进行洗钱调查时拥有的权力包括拖延交易的权力、要求举报人提供财富信息的权力、扣押资产的权力以及冻结资产的权力。在西苏门答腊,林业部门的洗钱调查工作由省林业局 PPNS 和执法与森林保护总局 (Gakkum LHK) PPNS 负责。这两个机构协调处理所有林业犯罪,包括洗钱。此外,还与国家警察局(POLRI)和金融交易报告和分析中心(PPATK)协调解决洗钱案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pelaksanaan Asesmen Risiko dan Asesmen Kebutuhan Terhadap Narapidana Narkotika Di Lapas Narkotika Kelas III Sawahlunto Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Penyebaran Data Pribadi Oleh Penyedia Jasa Pinjaman Online Illegal dalam Perspektif Viktimologi Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Melalui Hukum Pidana Adat Di Kecamatan Koto Baru Kota Sungai Penuh Provinsi Jambi Studi Perbandingan Terhadap Rumusan Pidana Mati Pada Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Dengan Undang Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Tinjauan Kriminologis Terhadap Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Dibidang Perikanan Dan Penanggulangannya Di Laut Kabupaten Bintan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1