WODEN AND MAXIMS I

Traditio Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/tdo.2023.5
Leonard Neidorf
{"title":"WODEN AND MAXIMS I","authors":"Leonard Neidorf","doi":"10.1017/tdo.2023.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reconsiders the passage in Maxims I in which Woden is said to have constructed wēos, a word that can be understood to mean “idols” or “pagan shrines.” It compares the passage to various euhemeristic narratives concerning Woden (or Óðinn) preserved by authors such as Ælfric, Æthelweard, Saxo Grammaticus, and Snorri Sturluson, and it argues that the Maxims I passage has more in common with ideas expressed in the later Scandinavian sources than in the earlier homiletic or insular historiographical sources. This exercise in comparative euhemerism suggests that the Woden passage in Maxims I is indebted to a narrative that resembled either the story of Óðinn's misadventure with an idol (preserved in Gesta Danorum) or the story of Óðinn as the builder of temples and founder of pagan religion (preserved in Ynglinga saga). In either case, it appears that a euhemeristic narrative of the sort preserved by Snorri and Saxo circulated centuries earlier in England. Toponymic evidence lends support to this conclusion, as place-names such as Wōdnes dīc and Grīmes dīc bear witness to the early circulation of otherwise unrecorded ideas about Woden as a supernatural builder. Finally, the presence of the Woden passage in Maxims I is viewed as a manifestation of the poem's indebtedness to the tradition of the wisdom contest, a genre associated with Óðinn in Old Norse sapiential literature.","PeriodicalId":510537,"journal":{"name":"Traditio","volume":"71 38","pages":"79 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traditio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/tdo.2023.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the passage in Maxims I in which Woden is said to have constructed wēos, a word that can be understood to mean “idols” or “pagan shrines.” It compares the passage to various euhemeristic narratives concerning Woden (or Óðinn) preserved by authors such as Ælfric, Æthelweard, Saxo Grammaticus, and Snorri Sturluson, and it argues that the Maxims I passage has more in common with ideas expressed in the later Scandinavian sources than in the earlier homiletic or insular historiographical sources. This exercise in comparative euhemerism suggests that the Woden passage in Maxims I is indebted to a narrative that resembled either the story of Óðinn's misadventure with an idol (preserved in Gesta Danorum) or the story of Óðinn as the builder of temples and founder of pagan religion (preserved in Ynglinga saga). In either case, it appears that a euhemeristic narrative of the sort preserved by Snorri and Saxo circulated centuries earlier in England. Toponymic evidence lends support to this conclusion, as place-names such as Wōdnes dīc and Grīmes dīc bear witness to the early circulation of otherwise unrecorded ideas about Woden as a supernatural builder. Finally, the presence of the Woden passage in Maxims I is viewed as a manifestation of the poem's indebtedness to the tradition of the wisdom contest, a genre associated with Óðinn in Old Norse sapiential literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沃顿和格言 I
本文重新考虑了《格言一》中的一段话,其中说沃顿建造了 wēos,这个词可以理解为 "偶像 "或 "异教圣地"。它将这段话与Ælfric、Æthelweard、Saxo Grammaticus 和 Snorri Sturluson 等作者保存的有关 Woden(或 Óðinn)的各种历书叙事进行了比较,并认为《格言集一》中的这段话与斯堪的纳维亚晚期资料中表达的观点的共同点要多于早期的颂歌或岛屿史学资料。这种比较历时论的做法表明,《马克西姆篇 I》中的沃顿段落借鉴了一种叙事方式,这种叙事方式类似于Óðinn 与偶像的不幸遭遇的故事(保存在《达诺尔纪事》中),或者类似于Óðinn 作为神庙建造者和异教创始人的故事(保存在《英林加萨歌》中)。无论是哪种情况,斯诺里和萨克森所保留的那种历时性叙事似乎早在几个世纪前就在英格兰流传了。地名证据支持了这一结论,因为 Wōdnes dīc 和 Grīmes dīc 等地名见证了沃顿作为超自然建造者的思想在早期的流传,而这种思想在其他地方是没有记录的。最后,《格言 I》中出现沃顿的段落被视为该诗对智慧竞赛传统的一种借鉴,而智慧竞赛是古北欧智慧文学中与Óðinn 相关的一种体裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TDO volume 78 Cover and Front matter MEROVINGIAN MEDICINE BETWEEN PRACTICAL ART AND PHILOSOPHY THE EXEGETICAL WORLD THAT PAVED THE WAY FOR THE GLOSSA ORDINARIA: A STUDY OF MANUSCRIPTS, GLOSSES, AND COMMENTARIES ON MATTHEW IN THE TWELFTH CENTURY APOCALYPTIC ASCETICISM: COMPLETING THE EDITION OF ALEXANDER MINORITA'S EXPOSITIO IN APOCALYPSIM AS IT IS FOUND IN CAMBRIDGE, UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, MM.5.31 BEYOND THE BODY AND BACK AGAIN: VISIONS OF OTHERWORLDLY JOURNEYS IN CAROLINGIAN THEOLOGY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1