Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study

Digvijay Prakash Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai, Ram G. Maurya, Harshit Rastogi, Gyan P Singh
{"title":"Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study","authors":"Digvijay Prakash Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai, Ram G. Maurya, Harshit Rastogi, Gyan P Singh","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_38_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 100 patients of age 18–55 years, planned for elective upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator, were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 mL normal saline and Group 2 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and adverse events during the perioperative period were noted. The onset of sensory and motor block in Group 1 (16. 26 ± 2.23 and 21.68 ± 2.90 min) was slower than those in Group 2 (9.12 ± 2.40 and 12.68 ± 2.62 min), (<0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block in Group 1 was significantly shorter than those in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia in Group 1 (402.80 ± 28.21 min) was shorter than that in Group 2 (981.00 ± 92.26 min; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of the side effects, except in the incidence of sedation which is significantly higher in Group 2, (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine for supraclavicular nerve block resulted in earlier onset and prolonged duration of the sensorimotor blockade and provided a longer pain-free postoperative period without significant hemodynamic alterations.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_38_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A total of 100 patients of age 18–55 years, planned for elective upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator, were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 mL normal saline and Group 2 (n = 50) received 30 mL 0.5% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and adverse events during the perioperative period were noted. The onset of sensory and motor block in Group 1 (16. 26 ± 2.23 and 21.68 ± 2.90 min) was slower than those in Group 2 (9.12 ± 2.40 and 12.68 ± 2.62 min), (<0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block in Group 1 was significantly shorter than those in Group 2 (P < 0.001). The duration of analgesia in Group 1 (402.80 ± 28.21 min) was shorter than that in Group 2 (981.00 ± 92.26 min; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of the side effects, except in the incidence of sedation which is significantly higher in Group 2, (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine for supraclavicular nerve block resulted in earlier onset and prolonged duration of the sensorimotor blockade and provided a longer pain-free postoperative period without significant hemodynamic alterations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上肢手术锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因辅助药物的镇痛效果:前瞻性随机研究
这项随机对照研究的主要目的是评估在罗哌卡因中加入右美托咪定对锁骨上臂丛阻滞下接受上肢手术的患者感觉和运动阻滞的起始时间、持续时间以及镇痛时间的影响。 研究人员将 100 名年龄在 18-55 岁之间、计划在锁骨上臂丛阻滞下使用神经刺激器进行上肢择期手术的患者随机分为两组。第一组(n = 50)接受 30 mL 0.5% 罗哌卡因和 1 mL 生理盐水,第二组(n = 50)接受 30 mL 0.5% 罗哌卡因和 1 μg/kg 右美托咪定。记录了围手术期感觉和运动阻滞的发生和持续时间、镇痛持续时间以及不良反应。 第一组的感觉和运动阻滞起始时间(16.26 ± 2.23 分钟和 21.68 ± 2.90 分钟)慢于第二组(9.12 ± 2.40 分钟和 12.68 ± 2.62 分钟)(<0.001)。第 1 组的感觉和运动阻滞持续时间明显短于第 2 组(P < 0.001)。第一组的镇痛持续时间(402.80 ± 28.21 分钟)短于第二组(981.00 ± 92.26 分钟;P < 0.001)。除了镇静的发生率明显高于第 2 组外,两组的副作用发生率在统计学上无明显差异(P < 0.001)。 右美托咪定与罗哌卡因一起用于锁骨上神经阻滞可使感觉运动阻滞更早开始,持续时间更长,术后无痛时间更长,且无明显血流动力学改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block versus Single-shot Adductor Canal Block Using Ropivacaine for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodistention with Corticosteroid Instillation in Glenohumeral Joint for Relief in Frozen Shoulder: A Case Series Hypervitaminosis D Due to Overdose: A Case Series A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Guided erector Spinae Plane Block versus Local Anaesthetic Infiltration in Spine Surgeries for Intraoperative and Post-operative Analgesia Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Postdural Puncture Headache: A Less Trodden Path
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1