Randomized Comparative Study of Analgesic Effects of Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine (0.25%) versus Diclofenac Suppository in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Herniotomy under General Anesthesia

Sayantan Mukhopadhyay, Dipasri Bhattacharya, Sagar Rai, Gautam Piplai, Kumar Shailendra
{"title":"Randomized Comparative Study of Analgesic Effects of Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine (0.25%) versus Diclofenac Suppository in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Herniotomy under General Anesthesia","authors":"Sayantan Mukhopadhyay, Dipasri Bhattacharya, Sagar Rai, Gautam Piplai, Kumar Shailendra","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_105_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pain management intraoperatively and postoperatively in the pediatric age group is a matter of concern. On the one hand, children are poorer at precisely conveying the extent of pain all the while being more susceptible to pain-related complications such as laryngospasm. On the other hand, children are less suited to use of potent opioids due to associated complications which can often lead to catastrophe. Therefore, a multimodal approach is desirable to optimize pain management in children. A nerve block is a highly effective and popular modality nowadays. In this single-blinded, parallel group, monocentric, and randomized protocol study, we have compared the efficacy of pain control achieved in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as analgesic versus iliohypogastric ilioinguinal (IIIH) nerve block in herniotomy in pediatric age group. The parallel-group prospective study recruited 104 participants who were randomly allocated into two groups of 52 each, such that both groups received 1 mcg/kg fentanyl and sevoflurane during induction of GA. For analgesia, Group 2 was given diclofenac suppository intraoperative after induction of GA. Group 1 was given IIIH nerve block under nerve stimulator guidance for perioperative analgesia. Both groups were studied for the following parameters which included: time to get the 1st dose of rescue analgesic, total dose of rescue analgesic, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and hemodynamic parameters. We observed that Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference in the form of longer duration of analgesia after surgery (9.67 ± 1.80 h vs. 6.35 ± 0.84 h) and lower total dose of rescue analgesic requirement (69.23 ± 2 [22.77] vs. 106.23 ± 2 [21.49]) while having a better hemodynamic profile and lower cumulative VAS score (7.71 ± 1.39 vs. 12.04 ± 1.72). Based on the above findings, we deduce that preincisional nerve stimulator-guided IIIH block by levobupivacaine (0.25%, 0.3 ml/kg) and rectal diclofenac (2 mg/kg) is both safe approaches to provide postoperative analgesia in pediatric inguinal herniotomy under general anesthesia. However, nerve stimulator-guided IIIH nerve block by levobupivacaine is a safe and better choice as it provides more intense analgesia for a longer duration compared to diclofenac suppository in the immediate postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_105_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pain management intraoperatively and postoperatively in the pediatric age group is a matter of concern. On the one hand, children are poorer at precisely conveying the extent of pain all the while being more susceptible to pain-related complications such as laryngospasm. On the other hand, children are less suited to use of potent opioids due to associated complications which can often lead to catastrophe. Therefore, a multimodal approach is desirable to optimize pain management in children. A nerve block is a highly effective and popular modality nowadays. In this single-blinded, parallel group, monocentric, and randomized protocol study, we have compared the efficacy of pain control achieved in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as analgesic versus iliohypogastric ilioinguinal (IIIH) nerve block in herniotomy in pediatric age group. The parallel-group prospective study recruited 104 participants who were randomly allocated into two groups of 52 each, such that both groups received 1 mcg/kg fentanyl and sevoflurane during induction of GA. For analgesia, Group 2 was given diclofenac suppository intraoperative after induction of GA. Group 1 was given IIIH nerve block under nerve stimulator guidance for perioperative analgesia. Both groups were studied for the following parameters which included: time to get the 1st dose of rescue analgesic, total dose of rescue analgesic, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and hemodynamic parameters. We observed that Group 1 showed a statistically significant difference in the form of longer duration of analgesia after surgery (9.67 ± 1.80 h vs. 6.35 ± 0.84 h) and lower total dose of rescue analgesic requirement (69.23 ± 2 [22.77] vs. 106.23 ± 2 [21.49]) while having a better hemodynamic profile and lower cumulative VAS score (7.71 ± 1.39 vs. 12.04 ± 1.72). Based on the above findings, we deduce that preincisional nerve stimulator-guided IIIH block by levobupivacaine (0.25%, 0.3 ml/kg) and rectal diclofenac (2 mg/kg) is both safe approaches to provide postoperative analgesia in pediatric inguinal herniotomy under general anesthesia. However, nerve stimulator-guided IIIH nerve block by levobupivacaine is a safe and better choice as it provides more intense analgesia for a longer duration compared to diclofenac suppository in the immediate postoperative period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全身麻醉下接受腹股沟疝气切除术的小儿患者中,使用左布比卡因(0.25%)进行腹股沟和下腹部神经阻滞与使用双氯芬酸栓剂的镇痛效果随机比较研究
儿科术中和术后的疼痛管理是一个值得关注的问题。一方面,儿童较难准确表达疼痛的程度,同时也更容易出现喉痉挛等与疼痛相关的并发症。另一方面,由于相关并发症往往会导致灾难,儿童不太适合使用强效阿片类药物。因此,最好采用多模式方法来优化儿童疼痛治疗。神经阻滞是一种高效且广受欢迎的方法。在这项单盲、平行组、单中心和随机方案研究中,我们比较了在儿科疝气切除术中使用非甾体类抗炎药作为镇痛剂与髂腹股沟(IIIH)神经阻滞的疼痛控制效果。 这项平行分组的前瞻性研究招募了 104 名参与者,将他们随机分配到两组,每组 52 人,两组在诱导 GA 时均接受 1 毫克/千克芬太尼和七氟醚。镇痛方面,第 2 组在诱导 GA 后术中使用双氯芬酸栓剂。第 1 组在神经刺激器引导下进行 IIIH 神经阻滞,用于围手术期镇痛。我们对两组患者的以下参数进行了研究,包括:获得第一剂镇痛药的时间、镇痛药总剂量、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和血液动力学参数。 我们观察到,第 1 组的术后镇痛时间更长(9.67 ± 1.80 小时 vs. 6.35 ± 0.84 小时),所需的抢救镇痛药总剂量更低(69.23 ± 2 [22.77] vs. 106.23 ± 2 [21.49]),同时血液动力学状况更好,累积 VAS 评分更低(7.71 ± 1.39 vs. 12.04 ± 1.72),这在统计学上有显著差异。 根据上述研究结果,我们推断,在小儿腹股沟疝气切除术的全身麻醉中,切口前神经刺激器引导的左旋布比卡因(0.25%,0.3 毫升/千克)和直肠双氯芬酸(2 毫克/千克)IIIH 阻滞都是提供术后镇痛的安全方法。然而,在神经刺激器引导下使用左旋布比卡因进行 IIIH 神经阻滞是一种安全且更好的选择,因为与双氯芬酸栓剂相比,左旋布比卡因在术后即刻提供的镇痛强度更高,持续时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block versus Single-shot Adductor Canal Block Using Ropivacaine for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodistention with Corticosteroid Instillation in Glenohumeral Joint for Relief in Frozen Shoulder: A Case Series Hypervitaminosis D Due to Overdose: A Case Series A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Guided erector Spinae Plane Block versus Local Anaesthetic Infiltration in Spine Surgeries for Intraoperative and Post-operative Analgesia Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Postdural Puncture Headache: A Less Trodden Path
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1