Impact of Laptop Usage, Typing Skills, and Ergonomics on Musculoskeletal Pain among Medical Resident Doctors – An Observational Study

Sonal Goyal, Bhavna Gupta
{"title":"Impact of Laptop Usage, Typing Skills, and Ergonomics on Musculoskeletal Pain among Medical Resident Doctors – An Observational Study","authors":"Sonal Goyal, Bhavna Gupta","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_74_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s era of digital learning, the utility of laptops has drastically been increased. Sustained postural strain resulting from poor ergonomics while using laptops may lead to musculoskeletal discomforts (MSD). This study aimed to determine touch-typing skills of medical students, quantitative assessment of their postural ergonomics, and implications of their efforts while typing on the prevalence of MSD. Sixty medical students were asked to take an online typing test (www.ratatype.com) and their typing speed in words per minute (WPM) and accuracy (%) were noted. The lateral pictures of the students were taken while performing the typing test and objective ergonomics analysis using craniovertebral angle (CVA) and rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) scoring system. None of the students demonstrated touch typing proficiency. The average typing speed (WPM) and accuracy (%) were observed to be 27.893 and 94.768, respectively. The mean CVA was 33.17, much lower than the average norm. The mean final RULA score was 5.62, indicating a high degree of MSD risk. Moderate-to-severe laptop users (≥4 h/day) showed higher prevalence of MSDs (P < 0.05) as compared to normal-to-mild users. A significant negative correlation was found between CVA and RULA scores. The study concluded average typing speed and accuracy, poor ergonomics (low CVA), and moderate-to-high MSD risk (based on RULA score) were seen among students. A high MSD prevalence was reported in laptop usage of ≥ 4 h/day, which can be ascribed to postural strain from improper typing habits and poor ergonomics.","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"382 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_74_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s era of digital learning, the utility of laptops has drastically been increased. Sustained postural strain resulting from poor ergonomics while using laptops may lead to musculoskeletal discomforts (MSD). This study aimed to determine touch-typing skills of medical students, quantitative assessment of their postural ergonomics, and implications of their efforts while typing on the prevalence of MSD. Sixty medical students were asked to take an online typing test (www.ratatype.com) and their typing speed in words per minute (WPM) and accuracy (%) were noted. The lateral pictures of the students were taken while performing the typing test and objective ergonomics analysis using craniovertebral angle (CVA) and rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) scoring system. None of the students demonstrated touch typing proficiency. The average typing speed (WPM) and accuracy (%) were observed to be 27.893 and 94.768, respectively. The mean CVA was 33.17, much lower than the average norm. The mean final RULA score was 5.62, indicating a high degree of MSD risk. Moderate-to-severe laptop users (≥4 h/day) showed higher prevalence of MSDs (P < 0.05) as compared to normal-to-mild users. A significant negative correlation was found between CVA and RULA scores. The study concluded average typing speed and accuracy, poor ergonomics (low CVA), and moderate-to-high MSD risk (based on RULA score) were seen among students. A high MSD prevalence was reported in laptop usage of ≥ 4 h/day, which can be ascribed to postural strain from improper typing habits and poor ergonomics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
笔记本电脑使用、打字技巧和人体工程学对医学住院医生肌肉骨骼疼痛的影响--一项观察研究
在当今数字化学习时代,笔记本电脑的实用性大大增强。在使用笔记本电脑时,因人体工学不良而造成的持续姿势劳损可能会导致肌肉骨骼不适(MSD)。本研究旨在确定医学生的触摸打字技能、对其姿势人体工学的定量评估,以及他们打字时的努力对 MSD 发病率的影响。 研究人员要求 60 名医学生参加在线打字测试 (www.ratatype.com),并记录了他们的打字速度(以每分钟字数计)和准确率(%)。学生们在进行打字测试和客观人体工程学分析时,使用颅椎体角度(CVA)和快速上肢评估(RULA)评分系统拍摄了侧面照片。 没有一名学生显示出触摸打字的熟练程度。平均打字速度(WPM)和准确率(%)分别为 27.893 和 94.768。平均 CVA 为 33.17,远低于平均值。平均最终 RULA 得分为 5.62,表明 MSD 风险较高。与正常至轻度用户相比,中度至重度笔记本电脑用户(≥4 小时/天)的 MSD 患病率更高(P < 0.05)。CVA 和 RULA 分数之间存在明显的负相关。 研究得出的结论是,学生的打字速度和准确性一般,人体工程学状况较差(CVA 较低),MSD 风险(根据 RULA 分数)为中度至高度。据报告,每天使用笔记本电脑≥ 4 小时的 MSD 患病率较高,这可能是由于不正确的打字习惯和不良的人体工程学设计造成的姿势劳损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block versus Single-shot Adductor Canal Block Using Ropivacaine for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodistention with Corticosteroid Instillation in Glenohumeral Joint for Relief in Frozen Shoulder: A Case Series Hypervitaminosis D Due to Overdose: A Case Series A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Guided erector Spinae Plane Block versus Local Anaesthetic Infiltration in Spine Surgeries for Intraoperative and Post-operative Analgesia Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Postdural Puncture Headache: A Less Trodden Path
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1