Does the implementation of self-administration policies for insulin improve patient safety in the hospital inpatient setting? A scoping review

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riad074.019
E. Davidson, T. Jones, W. Baqir, K. Fenwick
{"title":"Does the implementation of self-administration policies for insulin improve patient safety in the hospital inpatient setting? A scoping review","authors":"E. Davidson, T. Jones, W. Baqir, K. Fenwick","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riad074.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-administration schemes can have significant impact on a patient’s management and treatment of specific diseases. Implementing the self-administration of insulin for inpatients is believed to increase patient’s knowledge, understanding, independence and confidence regarding medication to improve outcomes. This study identifies the limited knowledge and access to self-administration schemes for diabetes. The aim of this scoping review is to collect and review relevant literature surrounding inpatient insulin self-administration schemes and to identify the impact this scheme has on knowledge, confidence, independence, satisfaction, costs and workload for patients, hospitals and staff. This scoping review further aims to highlight the reported limitations regarding self-administration and identify the potential gaps in the evidence-base. Keywords were searched on MEDLINE (1946 to October Week 4 2022), EMBASE (1974 to 2022 Week 43), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar from October 6th, 2022, to November 8th, 2022. The title, abstract and citations were initially screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included literature was then screened by a second reviewer. The identified literature described and evaluated inpatient insulin self-administration schemes and summarised according to author and study design. This scoping review did not require ethical approval as it was including information and studies freely available for public domain. Newcastle University Pharmacy Department. Among the 1,159 literature sources identified, 16 literature sources were included in the scoping review. A systematic review and meta-analysis was initially considered but yielded due to the heterogeneity of literature in study design. Nine quantitative and seven qualitative studies assessed individual patient and staff views. They were assessed in ranging time frames up to eight months. Literature evaluated the knowledge, understanding and compliance of patients relating to administration and drug regimens which were measured via questionnaires and interviews. Studies identified short-term costs to outweigh long-term benefits. The majority of patients and staff were significantly satisfied with the implementation of self-administration schemes. The implementation of insulin self-administration schemes for inpatients has shown to support patient health and safety, increasing knowledge and compliance. Literature continues to identify the need for extra support and maintenance from healthcare professionals to control diabetes. Self-administration schemes may continue to advance with increased support and engagement. Study limitations were identified to further acknowledged the advancements in time frames, support and sample size and selection for participants, supporting the advancements in self-administration schemes. 1. Wright J, Emerson A, Stephens M, Lennan E. Hospital inpatient self-administration of medicine programmes: a critical literature review. Pharmacy World and Science. 2006;28(3):140. 2. Muhammad K, Khan T, Nisar Ur R, Khan Z, Subhan F. Knowledge and attitude regarding insulin self-administration among diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study in a teaching hospital of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives. 2020;36(6):266-72. 3. Gangopadhyay KK, Ebinesan AD, Mtemererwa B, Marshall C, McGettigan AT, Cope A, et al. The timing of insulin administration to hospital inpatients is unsafe: Patient self-administration may make it safer. Practical Diabetes International. 2008;25(3):96-8.","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad074.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-administration schemes can have significant impact on a patient’s management and treatment of specific diseases. Implementing the self-administration of insulin for inpatients is believed to increase patient’s knowledge, understanding, independence and confidence regarding medication to improve outcomes. This study identifies the limited knowledge and access to self-administration schemes for diabetes. The aim of this scoping review is to collect and review relevant literature surrounding inpatient insulin self-administration schemes and to identify the impact this scheme has on knowledge, confidence, independence, satisfaction, costs and workload for patients, hospitals and staff. This scoping review further aims to highlight the reported limitations regarding self-administration and identify the potential gaps in the evidence-base. Keywords were searched on MEDLINE (1946 to October Week 4 2022), EMBASE (1974 to 2022 Week 43), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar from October 6th, 2022, to November 8th, 2022. The title, abstract and citations were initially screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included literature was then screened by a second reviewer. The identified literature described and evaluated inpatient insulin self-administration schemes and summarised according to author and study design. This scoping review did not require ethical approval as it was including information and studies freely available for public domain. Newcastle University Pharmacy Department. Among the 1,159 literature sources identified, 16 literature sources were included in the scoping review. A systematic review and meta-analysis was initially considered but yielded due to the heterogeneity of literature in study design. Nine quantitative and seven qualitative studies assessed individual patient and staff views. They were assessed in ranging time frames up to eight months. Literature evaluated the knowledge, understanding and compliance of patients relating to administration and drug regimens which were measured via questionnaires and interviews. Studies identified short-term costs to outweigh long-term benefits. The majority of patients and staff were significantly satisfied with the implementation of self-administration schemes. The implementation of insulin self-administration schemes for inpatients has shown to support patient health and safety, increasing knowledge and compliance. Literature continues to identify the need for extra support and maintenance from healthcare professionals to control diabetes. Self-administration schemes may continue to advance with increased support and engagement. Study limitations were identified to further acknowledged the advancements in time frames, support and sample size and selection for participants, supporting the advancements in self-administration schemes. 1. Wright J, Emerson A, Stephens M, Lennan E. Hospital inpatient self-administration of medicine programmes: a critical literature review. Pharmacy World and Science. 2006;28(3):140. 2. Muhammad K, Khan T, Nisar Ur R, Khan Z, Subhan F. Knowledge and attitude regarding insulin self-administration among diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study in a teaching hospital of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives. 2020;36(6):266-72. 3. Gangopadhyay KK, Ebinesan AD, Mtemererwa B, Marshall C, McGettigan AT, Cope A, et al. The timing of insulin administration to hospital inpatients is unsafe: Patient self-administration may make it safer. Practical Diabetes International. 2008;25(3):96-8.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰岛素自我管理政策的实施能否改善医院住院环境中的患者安全?范围审查
自我给药计划可对患者管理和治疗特定疾病产生重大影响。对住院病人实施胰岛素自我管理被认为可以增加病人对药物治疗的了解、理解、独立性和信心,从而改善治疗效果。本研究确定了糖尿病患者对自我管理计划的有限了解和获取途径。 本次范围界定审查旨在收集和审查有关住院患者胰岛素自我管理计划的相关文献,并确定该计划对患者、医院和员工的知识、信心、独立性、满意度、成本和工作量的影响。本次范围界定审查还旨在强调有关自我管理的报告局限性,并确定证据基础中的潜在差距。 自 2022 年 10 月 6 日至 2022 年 11 月 8 日,在 MEDLINE(1946 年至 2022 年 10 月第 4 周)、EMBASE(1974 年至 2022 年第 43 周)、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Google Scholar 上检索了相关关键词。根据纳入和排除标准对标题、摘要和引文进行初步筛选。然后由第二位审稿人对纳入的文献进行筛选。确定的文献对住院患者胰岛素自我管理方案进行了描述和评估,并根据作者和研究设计进行了总结。此次范围界定审查无需获得伦理批准,因为它包括了可在公共领域免费获取的信息和研究。纽卡斯尔大学药学系。 在已确定的 1,159 篇文献资料中,有 16 篇文献资料被纳入范围界定审查。最初考虑进行系统综述和荟萃分析,但由于研究设计方面的文献异质性而放弃。九项定量研究和七项定性研究对患者和员工的个人观点进行了评估。评估的时间范围最长为八个月。文献通过问卷调查和访谈的方式,评估了患者对用药和用药方案的了解、理解和依从性。研究发现,短期成本大于长期效益。大多数患者和医务人员对自我管理计划的实施非常满意。 对住院病人实施胰岛素自我管理计划已证明有助于患者的健康和安全,并能提高患者的知识水平和依从性。文献继续指出,控制糖尿病需要医护人员的额外支持和维护。随着支持和参与度的提高,自我管理计划可能会继续推进。研究局限性的确定进一步确认了时间框架、支持、样本大小和参与者选择方面的进步,支持了自我管理计划的进步。 1.Wright J, Emerson A, Stephens M, Lennan E. Hospital inpatient self-administration of medicine programs: a critical literature review.药学世界与科学》。2006;28(3):140. 2.Muhammad K, Khan T, Nisar Ur R, Khan Z, Subhan F. 《糖尿病患者对胰岛素自我管理的认识和态度:巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省一家教学医院的横断面研究》。药物与治疗展望》。2020;36(6):266-72. 3.Gangopadhyay KK, Ebinesan AD, Mtemererwa B, Marshall C, McGettigan AT, Cope A, et al:患者自行给药可能更安全。国际实用糖尿病》。2008;25(3):96-8.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients from the perspective of pharmaceutical care: a scoping review. Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study of community pharmacists in the UK. Correction to: Lifeguard Pharmacy: the co-development of a new community pharmacy response service for people in danger from domestic abuse or suicidal ideation. Trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial antiepileptic drug treatment in older epileptic patients. Pandemic preparedness of Egyptian community pharmacists and potential facilitators to the successful implementation of a community pharmacy coronavirus disease 2019 referral service: a cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1