Lumbar multifidus characteristics and body composition in university level athletes

Meagan Anstruther, Amanda Rizk, S. Frenette, Maryse Fortin
{"title":"Lumbar multifidus characteristics and body composition in university level athletes","authors":"Meagan Anstruther, Amanda Rizk, S. Frenette, Maryse Fortin","doi":"10.3389/fmscd.2023.1235114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Body composition is well known to affect sport performance and previous studies suggested that structural and functional lumbar multifidus (LM) impairments in athletes were associated with low back pain and lower leg injuries. However few studies have examined the relationship between LM characteristics and body composition in athletic populations.This cross-sectional study included a total of 134 university varsity athletes (hockey, soccer, rugby, and football players). Ultrasound imaging was used to examined LM characteristics at the L5 bilaterally [e.g., size, thickness at rest, thickness during contraction, echo-intensity (EI) and % thickness change from rest to contraction] and body composition parameters (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between LM characteristics and body composition parameters. One-way ANOVA assessed differences in LM characteristics and body composition between sports. All analyses were performed separately by sex.LM size and thickness were positively correlated with weight, height, lean body mass and total bone mass (male: r = 0.23–0.55, p < 0.01–0.05; female: r = 0.30–0.39, p < 0.01–0.05). LM EI was strongly correlated with % body fat (male: r = 0.62, female: r = 0.71, p < 0.01). LM thickness at rest (r = 0.42, p < 0.01) and contracted (r = 0.27, p < 0.05) were positively correlated and % thickness change was negatively correlated with % body fat in male athletes (r = −0.43, p < 0.01).The significant differences in body composition and LM characteristics between sports may be attributed to sport specific demands. Understanding connections between body composition and LM may aid in preseason screening for athletes at risk of low back pain or lower leg injuries during the season.","PeriodicalId":507589,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmscd.2023.1235114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Body composition is well known to affect sport performance and previous studies suggested that structural and functional lumbar multifidus (LM) impairments in athletes were associated with low back pain and lower leg injuries. However few studies have examined the relationship between LM characteristics and body composition in athletic populations.This cross-sectional study included a total of 134 university varsity athletes (hockey, soccer, rugby, and football players). Ultrasound imaging was used to examined LM characteristics at the L5 bilaterally [e.g., size, thickness at rest, thickness during contraction, echo-intensity (EI) and % thickness change from rest to contraction] and body composition parameters (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between LM characteristics and body composition parameters. One-way ANOVA assessed differences in LM characteristics and body composition between sports. All analyses were performed separately by sex.LM size and thickness were positively correlated with weight, height, lean body mass and total bone mass (male: r = 0.23–0.55, p < 0.01–0.05; female: r = 0.30–0.39, p < 0.01–0.05). LM EI was strongly correlated with % body fat (male: r = 0.62, female: r = 0.71, p < 0.01). LM thickness at rest (r = 0.42, p < 0.01) and contracted (r = 0.27, p < 0.05) were positively correlated and % thickness change was negatively correlated with % body fat in male athletes (r = −0.43, p < 0.01).The significant differences in body composition and LM characteristics between sports may be attributed to sport specific demands. Understanding connections between body composition and LM may aid in preseason screening for athletes at risk of low back pain or lower leg injuries during the season.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学水平运动员的腰部多裂肌特征和身体组成
众所周知,身体成分会影响运动表现,以往的研究表明,运动员腰部多裂肌(LM)的结构性和功能性损伤与腰痛和小腿损伤有关。这项横断面研究共纳入了 134 名大学校队运动员(曲棍球、足球、橄榄球和橄榄球运动员)。这项横断面研究共纳入了 134 名大学校队运动员(曲棍球、足球、橄榄球和足球运动员)。研究使用超声波成像技术检测了双侧 L5 肌的特征[如大小、静止时的厚度、收缩时的厚度、回声强度(EI)和从静止到收缩的厚度变化百分比]以及身体成分参数(双能量 X 射线吸收测量法)。皮尔逊相关性用于评估 LM 特征与身体成分参数之间的关系。单因素方差分析评估了不同运动之间 LM 特征和身体成分的差异。LM 大小和厚度与体重、身高、瘦体重和总骨量呈正相关(男性:r = 0.23-0.55,p < 0.01-0.05;女性:r = 0.30-0.39,p < 0.01-0.05)。LM EI 与体脂率密切相关(男性:r = 0.62;女性:r = 0.71,p < 0.01)。在男性运动员中,静止时(r = 0.42,p < 0.01)和收缩时(r = 0.27,p < 0.05)的LM厚度呈正相关,厚度变化率与体脂率呈负相关(r = -0.43,p < 0.01)。了解身体成分与低密度脂蛋白之间的关系有助于在赛季前筛查有腰痛或小腿受伤风险的运动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of fitting methods and variability of IVIM parameters in muscles of the lumbar spine at rest Tendon evaluation with ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI: a systematic review Elastic modulus of cadaveric acetabular labrum correlates with ultrashort echo time (UTE) apparent spin-spin (T2*) and spin-lattice (T1) relaxation times Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy using the StimaWELL 120MTRS system on erector spinae morphology in patients with chronic low back pain Screening practices, efficacy, safety and adherence to biologic therapies in a South African tertiary hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1