Burnout among COVID-19 hospital-based contact tracers in Singapore: results of a mixed-method, cross-sectional multicentre study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Singapore medical journal Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2021-458
Ian Matthias Ng, Tzu-Jung Wong, Yong Yang, I. Venkatachalam, J. Sim, L. Wee, T. Liew, Evelyn Boon, Tong Yong Ng, Hwi Kwang Han, Diana Yuen Lan Tan
{"title":"Burnout among COVID-19 hospital-based contact tracers in Singapore: results of a mixed-method, cross-sectional multicentre study","authors":"Ian Matthias Ng, Tzu-Jung Wong, Yong Yang, I. Venkatachalam, J. Sim, L. Wee, T. Liew, Evelyn Boon, Tong Yong Ng, Hwi Kwang Han, Diana Yuen Lan Tan","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2021-458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, contact tracers were under immense pressure to deliver effective and timely contact tracing, raising concerns of higher susceptibility to burnout. Our study aimed to determine burnout prevalence among hospital-based contact tracers and associated risk factors, so that interventions to reduce burnout risk could be formulated. One hundred and ninety-six active contact tracers across three hospitals within a healthcare cluster were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. To identify burntout, data such as demographics, work-related variables and contact tracing-related variables were collected using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Associated factors were identified using multivariate statistics. Open-ended questions were included to understand the challenges and potential improvements through qualitative analysis. A total of 126 participants completed the survey, giving a completion rate of 64%, and almost half of these participants (42.9%) reported burnout. Protective factors included being on work-from-home arrangements (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08–0.56), perception of being well supported by their institution (adjusted OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.80) and being married (adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.64). Risk factors included having an administrative role pre–COVID-19 (adjusted OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.33–9.83). Work-related burnout was related to being activated for more than 1 day in the preceding week (unadjusted OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.33–7.94) and multiple activations in a day (unadjusted OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.44–4.41). Biggest challenges identified by participants were language barrier (62.7%), followed by workflow-related issues (42.1%). Our study demonstrated burnout and other challenges faced by a team of mostly hospital-based administrative staff redeployed on a part-time basis to ensure timely contact tracing. To mitigate burnout, we recommend choosing staff on work-from-home arrangements and ensuring adequate manpower and rostering arrangements.","PeriodicalId":21752,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2021-458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, contact tracers were under immense pressure to deliver effective and timely contact tracing, raising concerns of higher susceptibility to burnout. Our study aimed to determine burnout prevalence among hospital-based contact tracers and associated risk factors, so that interventions to reduce burnout risk could be formulated. One hundred and ninety-six active contact tracers across three hospitals within a healthcare cluster were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. To identify burntout, data such as demographics, work-related variables and contact tracing-related variables were collected using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Associated factors were identified using multivariate statistics. Open-ended questions were included to understand the challenges and potential improvements through qualitative analysis. A total of 126 participants completed the survey, giving a completion rate of 64%, and almost half of these participants (42.9%) reported burnout. Protective factors included being on work-from-home arrangements (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08–0.56), perception of being well supported by their institution (adjusted OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.80) and being married (adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.64). Risk factors included having an administrative role pre–COVID-19 (adjusted OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.33–9.83). Work-related burnout was related to being activated for more than 1 day in the preceding week (unadjusted OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.33–7.94) and multiple activations in a day (unadjusted OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.44–4.41). Biggest challenges identified by participants were language barrier (62.7%), followed by workflow-related issues (42.1%). Our study demonstrated burnout and other challenges faced by a team of mostly hospital-based administrative staff redeployed on a part-time basis to ensure timely contact tracing. To mitigate burnout, we recommend choosing staff on work-from-home arrangements and ensuring adequate manpower and rostering arrangements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡 COVID-19 医院接触追踪员的职业倦怠:一项混合方法横断面多中心研究的结果
在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,接触追踪人员面临着及时有效地开展接触追踪工作的巨大压力,这引发了他们更容易产生职业倦怠的担忧。我们的研究旨在确定医院接触追踪人员的职业倦怠发生率及相关风险因素,从而制定降低职业倦怠风险的干预措施。 我们邀请了一个医疗集团内三家医院的 196 名活跃的联络追踪员完成匿名在线调查。为了识别职业倦怠,我们使用哥本哈根职业倦怠量表收集了人口统计学、工作相关变量和接触追踪相关变量等数据。使用多变量统计确定了相关因素。调查还包括开放式问题,以便通过定性分析了解所面临的挑战和可能的改进措施。 共有 126 名参与者完成了调查,完成率为 64%,其中近一半(42.9%)的参与者报告了职业倦怠。保护因素包括在家工作的安排(调整后的几率比[OR]0.22,95%置信区间[CI]0.08-0.56)、认为得到所在机构的良好支持(调整后的几率比0.25,95%置信区间[CI]0.08-0.80)和已婚(调整后的几率比0.28,95%置信区间[CI]0.12-0.64)。风险因素包括在COVID-19之前担任行政职务(调整后OR为3.62,95% CI为1.33-9.83)。与工作相关的倦怠与前一周被激活超过 1 天(未调整 OR 3.25,95% CI 1.33-7.94)和一天内多次激活(未调整 OR 3.54,95% CI 1.44-4.41)有关。参与者认为最大的挑战是语言障碍(62.7%),其次是工作流程相关问题(42.1%)。 我们的研究表明,为确保及时追踪联系人而重新部署的兼职行政人员团队面临着职业倦怠和其他挑战。为减轻职业倦怠,我们建议选择在家工作的员工,并确保充足的人力和轮岗安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Singapore medical journal
Singapore medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ) is the monthly publication of Singapore Medical Association (SMA). The Journal aims to advance medical practice and clinical research by publishing high-quality articles that add to the clinical knowledge of physicians in Singapore and worldwide. SMJ is a general medical journal that focuses on all aspects of human health. The Journal publishes commissioned reviews, commentaries and editorials, original research, a small number of outstanding case reports, continuing medical education articles (ECG Series, Clinics in Diagnostic Imaging, Pictorial Essays, Practice Integration & Life-long Learning [PILL] Series), and short communications in the form of letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and practices of exercise among pregnant mothers in Singapore. Perceptions and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant and lactating women in Singapore: a pre-vaccine rollout cross-sectional study. Perspectives on end-of-life care of critically ill surgical patients: a survey of anaesthesiology residents. Determining diabetic kidney disease severity using traditional Chinese medicine syndrome classification. Knowledge and awareness of perinatal antiviral use in the prevention of mother-to-child hepatitis B virus transmission among maternal chronic hepatitis carriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1