Development and feasibility study of a community pharmacy intervention to support self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes, in Cyprus

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riad074.052
A. Pavlidou, F. Smith, C. Whittlesea
{"title":"Development and feasibility study of a community pharmacy intervention to support self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes, in Cyprus","authors":"A. Pavlidou, F. Smith, C. Whittlesea","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riad074.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pharmacists’ role has evolved over the past years towards a more clinical role to support patients in managing various prevalent health conditions.1 Cyprus had one of the highest prevalence of diabetes among other European countries in 2021.2 Motivational interviewing has been shown to be an effective tool in consultations.3 In recent years there has been increasing interest in the potential of mobile technologies in health care. However, effective implementation, management, and evaluation of those interventions aiming to improve type 2 diabetes self-management are still being researched. The aim of this study was to design and implement a mobile health intervention delivered by a pharmacist applying motivational interviewing techniques, aiming to improve the self-management of type 2 diabetes patients. Then, assess primarily the feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and, secondarily, the participants' medication adherence and self-care activity. Type 2 diabetes patients visiting a diabetes clinic in Cyprus were recruited. The intervention included: online communication with the pharmacist, tracking & uploading blood glucose readings, graphical reports, reminders, education, and optimization of pharmacotherapy delivered over an initial face-to-face consultation and up to 3 follow-up telephone appointments at 6-8 weeks intervals. Feasibility was measured by recruitment & retention, use & workability of the intervention, and basic costs. Participants’ & healthcare professionals’ acceptability was assessed via two semi-structured interview schedules based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (Sekhon et al., 2017). Participants’ medication adherence and self-care activity were assessed by Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire - Greek version before and after the intervention. The study obtained ethical approval from the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee (27/11/2019, reference number EEBK ΕΠ 2019.01.202), the Cyprus Ethics Committee (05/04/2020, reference number 01/20) and the UCL Research Ethics Committee (28/04/2020, reference number Z6364106/2020/04/129). Twenty-seven patients agreed to participate, of whom 22 completed the intervention. From the available services, all participants agreed to use online communication, chose education, and the review of patients’ medications. A barrier to the intervention was the pharmacist accessing patients’ data, as HbA1c was accessible in 69% of participants and blood glucose in 90%. Based on study findings, participants valued the motivational interview and pharmacist approach, while healthcare professionals highlighted the benefits of pharmacy service, specifically medication adherence. Participants reported improvements in self-care during the study period in three out of five domains assessed in the DSCAQ– Greek version (blood sugar testing, healthy eating, and foot care), whereas adherence to diabetes medications and physical activity remained the same. Although the results were not statistically powered, as this was a feasibility study, there was an indication that this individualised and evidence-based intervention, could holistically support diabetes patients. A limitation of the study was that the person who developed and evaluated the intervention was the same as the person who delivered it. However, the findings indicated the potential value of the intervention to patients and healthcare professionals. It also provided information to support the intervention's integration into the Cyprus healthcare system and in other similar settings. 1. Royal Pharmaceutical society (RPS). Improving care for people with long term conditions. [Internet]. London; 2016 [Accessed 09 January 2023]. Available from: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Policy/LTC%20-%20England.pdf. 2. International diabetes federation (IDF). Diabetes atlas 10th edition. [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium; 2021 [Accessed 23 February 2023]. Available from: http://diabetesatlas.org/IDF_Diabetes_Atlas_8e_interactive_EN/. 3. Salimi, C., Momtazi, S., Zenuzian, S. A review on effectiveness of motivational interviewing in the management of diabetes mellitus. JPCPY. 2016; 5(4): 00294. doi: 10.15406/jpcpy.2016.05.00294.","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad074.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pharmacists’ role has evolved over the past years towards a more clinical role to support patients in managing various prevalent health conditions.1 Cyprus had one of the highest prevalence of diabetes among other European countries in 2021.2 Motivational interviewing has been shown to be an effective tool in consultations.3 In recent years there has been increasing interest in the potential of mobile technologies in health care. However, effective implementation, management, and evaluation of those interventions aiming to improve type 2 diabetes self-management are still being researched. The aim of this study was to design and implement a mobile health intervention delivered by a pharmacist applying motivational interviewing techniques, aiming to improve the self-management of type 2 diabetes patients. Then, assess primarily the feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and, secondarily, the participants' medication adherence and self-care activity. Type 2 diabetes patients visiting a diabetes clinic in Cyprus were recruited. The intervention included: online communication with the pharmacist, tracking & uploading blood glucose readings, graphical reports, reminders, education, and optimization of pharmacotherapy delivered over an initial face-to-face consultation and up to 3 follow-up telephone appointments at 6-8 weeks intervals. Feasibility was measured by recruitment & retention, use & workability of the intervention, and basic costs. Participants’ & healthcare professionals’ acceptability was assessed via two semi-structured interview schedules based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (Sekhon et al., 2017). Participants’ medication adherence and self-care activity were assessed by Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire - Greek version before and after the intervention. The study obtained ethical approval from the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee (27/11/2019, reference number EEBK ΕΠ 2019.01.202), the Cyprus Ethics Committee (05/04/2020, reference number 01/20) and the UCL Research Ethics Committee (28/04/2020, reference number Z6364106/2020/04/129). Twenty-seven patients agreed to participate, of whom 22 completed the intervention. From the available services, all participants agreed to use online communication, chose education, and the review of patients’ medications. A barrier to the intervention was the pharmacist accessing patients’ data, as HbA1c was accessible in 69% of participants and blood glucose in 90%. Based on study findings, participants valued the motivational interview and pharmacist approach, while healthcare professionals highlighted the benefits of pharmacy service, specifically medication adherence. Participants reported improvements in self-care during the study period in three out of five domains assessed in the DSCAQ– Greek version (blood sugar testing, healthy eating, and foot care), whereas adherence to diabetes medications and physical activity remained the same. Although the results were not statistically powered, as this was a feasibility study, there was an indication that this individualised and evidence-based intervention, could holistically support diabetes patients. A limitation of the study was that the person who developed and evaluated the intervention was the same as the person who delivered it. However, the findings indicated the potential value of the intervention to patients and healthcare professionals. It also provided information to support the intervention's integration into the Cyprus healthcare system and in other similar settings. 1. Royal Pharmaceutical society (RPS). Improving care for people with long term conditions. [Internet]. London; 2016 [Accessed 09 January 2023]. Available from: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Policy/LTC%20-%20England.pdf. 2. International diabetes federation (IDF). Diabetes atlas 10th edition. [Internet]. Brussels, Belgium; 2021 [Accessed 23 February 2023]. Available from: http://diabetesatlas.org/IDF_Diabetes_Atlas_8e_interactive_EN/. 3. Salimi, C., Momtazi, S., Zenuzian, S. A review on effectiveness of motivational interviewing in the management of diabetes mellitus. JPCPY. 2016; 5(4): 00294. doi: 10.15406/jpcpy.2016.05.00294.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在塞浦路斯开展社区药房干预措施的开发和可行性研究,以支持 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理
1 2021 年,塞浦路斯是欧洲其他国家中糖尿病发病率最高的国家之一。2 激励性访谈已被证明是一种有效的咨询工具。3 近年来,人们对移动技术在医疗保健领域的潜力越来越感兴趣。然而,对这些旨在改善 2 型糖尿病自我管理的干预措施的有效实施、管理和评估仍在研究之中。 本研究的目的是设计并实施一项由药剂师应用动机访谈技术提供的移动医疗干预措施,旨在改善 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理。然后,主要评估干预措施的可行性和可接受性,其次评估参与者的服药依从性和自我护理活动。 研究人员招募了在塞浦路斯一家糖尿病诊所就诊的 2 型糖尿病患者。干预措施包括:与药剂师在线交流、跟踪和上传血糖读数、图形报告、提醒、教育和优化药物治疗,通过首次面对面咨询和多达 3 次的电话随访进行,每次间隔 6-8 周。可行性通过招募和保留、干预措施的使用和可操作性以及基本成本来衡量。根据可接受性理论框架(Sekhon et al.)干预前后,参与者的用药依从性和自我护理活动由糖尿病自我护理活动问卷(希腊语版)进行评估。该研究获得了塞浦路斯国家生物伦理委员会(27/11/2019,参考编号 EEBK ΕΠ 2019.01.202)、塞浦路斯伦理委员会(05/04/2020,参考编号 01/20)和 UCL 研究伦理委员会(28/04/2020,参考编号 Z6364106/2020/04/129)的伦理批准。 27 名患者同意参与,其中 22 人完成了干预。从现有服务来看,所有参与者都同意使用在线交流、选择教育和审查患者用药。药剂师访问患者数据是干预的一个障碍,因为 69% 的参与者可以访问 HbA1c,90% 的参与者可以访问血糖。根据研究结果,参与者重视动机访谈和药剂师的方法,而医护人员则强调了药学服务的益处,特别是坚持用药。在希腊语版 DSCAQ 评估的五个领域中,有三个领域(血糖检测、健康饮食和足部护理)的自我护理情况有所改善,而糖尿病药物治疗和体育锻炼的依从性则保持不变。 尽管由于这是一项可行性研究,因此研究结果不具有统计学意义,但有迹象表明,这种以证据为基础的个性化干预措施可以为糖尿病患者提供全面支持。这项研究的局限性在于,制定和评估干预措施的人与实施干预措施的人是同一个人。不过,研究结果表明了该干预措施对患者和医护人员的潜在价值。研究还提供了相关信息,以支持将该干预措施纳入塞浦路斯医疗保健系统和其他类似环境。 1.皇家药学协会(RPS)。改善对长期病患者的护理。[互联网]。伦敦;2016 年 [2023 年 1 月 9 日访问]。网址:https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Policy/LTC%20-%20England.pdf。 2.国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)。糖尿病图谱第 10 版。[Internet].比利时布鲁塞尔;2021 年 [2023 年 2 月 23 日访问]。网址:http://diabetesatlas.org/IDF_Diabetes_Atlas_8e_interactive_EN/。 3.Salimi, C., Momtazi, S., Zenuzian, S. A review on effectiveness of motivational interviewing in the management of diabetes mellitus.JPCPY.2016; 5(4):00294. doi: 10.15406/jpcpy.2016.05.00294.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Gender and ethnicity bias in generative artificial intelligence text-to-image depiction of pharmacists. Lifeguard Pharmacy: the co-development of a new community pharmacy response service for people in danger from domestic abuse or suicidal ideation. The relationship between psychological burden and providing assistance with taking medication among caregivers of patients with dementia: a cross-sectional study. Perceptions and experiences of community pharmacists with off-label prescribing in the pediatric population. Community pharmacists' attitudes towards checking prescriptions: a cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1