Lava flow hosted reservoirs: a review

J. Millett, Lucas Rossetti, Alan Bischoff, Marcos Rossetti, Marija P. Rosenqvist, Per Avseth, Malcolm J. Hole, Simona Pierdominici, Dave Healy, D. Jerram, S. Planke
{"title":"Lava flow hosted reservoirs: a review","authors":"J. Millett, Lucas Rossetti, Alan Bischoff, Marcos Rossetti, Marija P. Rosenqvist, Per Avseth, Malcolm J. Hole, Simona Pierdominici, Dave Healy, D. Jerram, S. Planke","doi":"10.1144/sp547-2023-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lava flows form important fluid reservoirs and have been extensively exploited for water aquifers, geothermal energy, hydrocarbon production, and more recently for carbon storage. Effusive subaerial mafic to intermediate lava flows account for vast rock volumes globally, and form reservoirs with properties dictated by well-known lava flow facies ranging from pāhoehoe through several transitional forms to ‘a’ā lava. These variations in flow type lead to critical differences in the pore structure, distribution, connectivity, strength, and fracturing of individual lava flows, which, alongside lava flow package architectures, determine primary reservoir potential. Lava flow margins with vesicular, fracture, and often autobreccia hosted pore structures can have porosities commonly exceeding 40% and matrix permeabilities over 1 E-11 m 2 (> 10 darcy) separated by much lower porosity and permeability flow interiors. Secondary post-emplacement physicochemical changes related to fracturing, meteoric, diagenetic, and hydrothermal alteration can significantly modify reservoir potential through a complex interplay of mineral transformation, pore clogging secondary minerals, and dissolution which must be carefully characterized and assessed during exploration and appraisal. Within this contribution, a review of selected global lava flow hosted reservoir occurrences is presented followed by a discussion on the factors that influence lava flow reservoir potential.","PeriodicalId":281618,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society, London, Special Publications","volume":"624 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society, London, Special Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/sp547-2023-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lava flows form important fluid reservoirs and have been extensively exploited for water aquifers, geothermal energy, hydrocarbon production, and more recently for carbon storage. Effusive subaerial mafic to intermediate lava flows account for vast rock volumes globally, and form reservoirs with properties dictated by well-known lava flow facies ranging from pāhoehoe through several transitional forms to ‘a’ā lava. These variations in flow type lead to critical differences in the pore structure, distribution, connectivity, strength, and fracturing of individual lava flows, which, alongside lava flow package architectures, determine primary reservoir potential. Lava flow margins with vesicular, fracture, and often autobreccia hosted pore structures can have porosities commonly exceeding 40% and matrix permeabilities over 1 E-11 m 2 (> 10 darcy) separated by much lower porosity and permeability flow interiors. Secondary post-emplacement physicochemical changes related to fracturing, meteoric, diagenetic, and hydrothermal alteration can significantly modify reservoir potential through a complex interplay of mineral transformation, pore clogging secondary minerals, and dissolution which must be carefully characterized and assessed during exploration and appraisal. Within this contribution, a review of selected global lava flow hosted reservoir occurrences is presented followed by a discussion on the factors that influence lava flow reservoir potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熔岩流承载储层:综述
熔岩流是重要的流体储层,已被广泛用于含水层、地热能源、碳氢化合物生产以及最近的碳储存。在全球范围内,喷出的次生岩浆岩到中间岩浆岩流占据了巨大的岩石体积,形成的储层具有众所周知的熔岩流面所决定的特性,从pāhoehoe到几种过渡形态,再到'a'ā熔岩。熔岩流类型的这些变化导致单个熔岩流在孔隙结构、分布、连通性、强度和断裂方面存在重大差异,这些差异与熔岩流包体结构一起决定了主要储层的潜力。熔岩流边缘具有泡状、断裂以及通常由自生砾岩寄生的孔隙结构,其孔隙率通常超过 40%,基质渗透率超过 1 E-11 m 2(> 10 darcy),而熔岩流内部的孔隙率和渗透率要低得多。与压裂、流变、成岩和热液蚀变有关的次生置换后物理化学变化可通过矿物转化、孔隙堵塞次生矿物和溶解等复杂的相互作用显著改变储层的潜力,在勘探和评价过程中必须对这些变化进行仔细的描述和评估。在这篇论文中,将对选定的全球熔岩流赋存储层进行回顾,然后讨论影响熔岩流储层潜力的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decoding Apatite in Volcanic Carbonatitic breccia from Mongra, Northwest of Amba Dongar Carbonatite Complex, Gujarat, India: Insights to Genesis & Rare Earth Element Budgets Magmatic (Cr-Ni-PGE) and secondary/hydrothermal (emerald-peridot-rodingite-nephrite jade) mineralization associated with mafic-ultramafic rock complexes of Pakistan Petrogenesis and Ni-Cu-(PGE) prospectivity of the Mount Ayliff Complex in the Karoo Igneous Province: new insights from the Ingeli and Horseshoe lobes Fractal dimension and its implication to Mineral Exploration: A case study from Jonnagiri and Gadag gold deposits in India Formation of PGE- and sulphide-bearing chromitites and associated anorthositic rocks in layered intrusion by infiltration of reactive, Cl-rich fluid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1