Restrictive Interpretation of Exceptions: Identification and Hunt of Ideologies

Q4 Social Sciences Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.3935/zpfz.73.4.4
Víctor García Yzaguirre, Hugo Osorio Morales
{"title":"Restrictive Interpretation of Exceptions: Identification and Hunt of Ideologies","authors":"Víctor García Yzaguirre, Hugo Osorio Morales","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.73.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is to assert that jurists advocating for the restrictive interpretation of exceptions in rules, or exceptions to rules, often do so based on an underlying interpretive ideology. To achieve this goal, we will conduct a metatheoretical analysis of how legal theorists have conceptualized the notions of restrictive interpretation and exception. This analysis aims to demonstrate that, when viewed from this perspective, there is no conceptual relationship between these two notions.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.73.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this article is to assert that jurists advocating for the restrictive interpretation of exceptions in rules, or exceptions to rules, often do so based on an underlying interpretive ideology. To achieve this goal, we will conduct a metatheoretical analysis of how legal theorists have conceptualized the notions of restrictive interpretation and exception. This analysis aims to demonstrate that, when viewed from this perspective, there is no conceptual relationship between these two notions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对例外的限制性解释:意识形态的识别与猎取
本文旨在断言,主张对规则中的例外或规则的例外进行限制性解释的法学家往往是基于一种潜在的解释意识形态而这样做的。为了实现这一目标,我们将对法律理论家如何将限制性解释和例外概念化进行元理论分析。该分析旨在证明,从这个角度来看,这两个概念之间并不存在概念关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Obiteljsko nasilje u svjetlu penalnog populizma Izazovi posebnog dijela kaznenog prava zbog razvoja umjetne inteligencije uz poseban osvrt na hrvatsko kazneno pravo O sukobu načela transparentnosti i prava na tajnost podataka u pravu javne nabave Republike Hrvatske Ovrha na virtualnim valutama Socijalne i ekonomske odredbe u pravnom poretku Banovine Hrvatske
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1