Imagining Freedom in Slavery’s Future: Iron City’s Fugitive Othertime in the US Carceral Empire-State

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AMERICAN QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1353/aq.2023.a913519
Caroline H. Yang
{"title":"Imagining Freedom in Slavery’s Future: Iron City’s Fugitive Othertime in the US Carceral Empire-State","authors":"Caroline H. Yang","doi":"10.1353/aq.2023.a913519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay examines Black political activism during the Korean War in publications that defined their present moment as slavery’s future and characterized slavery and antiblack racism as part of an ongoing war against Black people, connected to US empire’s wars abroad. In particular, it reads Lloyd Brown’s novel Iron City (1951), about four Black men incarcerated on trumped-up charges, alongside Paul Robeson’s Freedom newspaper (1950–55) and William Patterson’s We Charge Genocide (1951). Centering on four Black men serving time, the novel demonstrates that one tactic in the war against Black freedom is through the control of time and shows a connection between incarceration and slavery by revealing the disciplinary mechanism of time in service of US empire. Rather than acquiesce to the omnipotence of empire’s time and endless wars, however, Iron City, exemplifying the Black radical thought of the 1950s, imagines a different future, which I term fugitive othertime. Building on Saidiya Hartman’s theorization of a “fugitive elsewhere,” “an imagined place [that] might afford you a vision of freedom,” I argue for reading Iron City for its dream of a fugitive othertime, as an imagined temporality in which that elsewhere might exist.","PeriodicalId":51543,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN QUARTERLY","volume":"258 ","pages":"731 - 752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2023.a913519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay examines Black political activism during the Korean War in publications that defined their present moment as slavery’s future and characterized slavery and antiblack racism as part of an ongoing war against Black people, connected to US empire’s wars abroad. In particular, it reads Lloyd Brown’s novel Iron City (1951), about four Black men incarcerated on trumped-up charges, alongside Paul Robeson’s Freedom newspaper (1950–55) and William Patterson’s We Charge Genocide (1951). Centering on four Black men serving time, the novel demonstrates that one tactic in the war against Black freedom is through the control of time and shows a connection between incarceration and slavery by revealing the disciplinary mechanism of time in service of US empire. Rather than acquiesce to the omnipotence of empire’s time and endless wars, however, Iron City, exemplifying the Black radical thought of the 1950s, imagines a different future, which I term fugitive othertime. Building on Saidiya Hartman’s theorization of a “fugitive elsewhere,” “an imagined place [that] might afford you a vision of freedom,” I argue for reading Iron City for its dream of a fugitive othertime, as an imagined temporality in which that elsewhere might exist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
想象奴隶制未来的自由:铁城的逃亡者在美国胴体帝国中的异时空
摘要:这篇文章研究了朝鲜战争期间黑人在出版物中的政治活动,这些出版物将他们的当下定义为奴隶制的未来,并将奴隶制和反黑人种族主义描述为针对黑人的持续战争的一部分,与美帝的海外战争联系在一起。特别是,该书将劳埃德-布朗(Lloyd Brown)的小说《铁城》(Iron City,1951 年)与保罗-罗伯逊(Paul Robeson)的《自由报》(Freedom newspaper,1950-55 年)和威廉-帕特森(William Patterson)的《我们控告种族灭绝》(We Charge Genocide,1951 年)放在一起阅读,后者讲述了四名黑人因莫须有的罪名而被监禁的故事。小说以四名服刑的黑人为中心,展示了反对黑人自由战争的一种策略是通过控制时间,并通过揭示为美帝服务的时间惩戒机制,显示了监禁与奴隶制之间的联系。然而,《钢铁之城》并没有默许帝国时间的万能和无休止的战争,而是以 20 世纪 50 年代黑人激进思想为典范,想象了一个不同的未来,我称之为 "逃亡的他时"。基于赛迪亚-哈特曼(Saidiya Hartman)关于 "逃亡他乡 "的理论,"一个想象中的地方,[它]可能会给你带来自由的憧憬",我主张将《钢铁之城》解读为逃亡他乡的梦想,作为一种想象中的时间性,在这种时间性中,逃亡他乡可能存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN QUARTERLY
AMERICAN QUARTERLY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: American Quarterly represents innovative interdisciplinary scholarship that engages with key issues in American Studies. The journal publishes essays that examine American societies and cultures, past and present, in global and local contexts. This includes work that contributes to our understanding of the United States in its diversity, its relations with its hemispheric neighbors, and its impact on world politics and culture. Through the publication of reviews of books, exhibitions, and diverse media, the journal seeks to make available the broad range of emergent approaches to American Studies.
期刊最新文献
Index to American Quarterly Volume 75 March 2023 to December 2023 Citizenship Violence, Illegality, and Abolition in the Undocumemoir Reforming the Chorus: Insurgent Collectivities in Hansberry’s Smug Bohemia (Re)Mapping Worlds: An Indigenous (Studies) Perspective on the Potential for Abolitionist and Decolonial Futures Laundering Militarization: Preparedness, Professionalism, and Police Common Sense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1