Beyond the boundaries of ward-based services – exploring the scope of “non-traditional” clinical pharmacy practice in a tertiary referral teaching hospital

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riad074.016
C. Cheng
{"title":"Beyond the boundaries of ward-based services – exploring the scope of “non-traditional” clinical pharmacy practice in a tertiary referral teaching hospital","authors":"C. Cheng","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riad074.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hospital clinical pharmacy practice in the UK has developed beyond traditional boundaries of ward-based inpatient services. Royal Pharmaceutical Society Hospital Pharmacy Standards recommend pharmacy team members are integrated into multidisciplinary teams across the organisation to ensure safe and appropriate medicines use whatever the setting1. Pharmacy professionals provide pharmaceutical care and specialist services in outpatient and ambulatory settings and through participation in multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. Within the outpatient setting, research typically focusses on single outpatient clinics within specific disciplines, little evidence describes the overall contribution to patient care across whole pharmacy services2. To describe the scope of clinical pharmacy services occurring beyond traditional ward-based services in a tertiary hospital; including quantification of outpatient clinics and MDT meetings provided by pharmacy professionals. The Deputy Chief Pharmacist invited clinical Principal Pharmacists to participate in semi-structured interviews exploring the scope of “non-traditional” services across the Trust during March 2023. Non-traditional services were defined as direct clinical care outside of ward-based inpatient clinical pharmacy services. Indirect clinical care activities such as guideline writing, drug expenditure and governance activities were excluded. Inpatient board rounds/ward rounds and any service not currently provided due to vacancy were excluded. Participants were asked to quantify services provided, advise who provided the services and to describe contributions provided by the pharmacy team. The study was deemed service evaluation and ethical approval waived. 100% invited pharmacists participated. Pharmacists attended and contributed to over 150 MDT meetings monthly across 24 sub-specialities; 80% were for outpatients. In tertiary/quaternary services, these frequently covered patients beyond local geography. MDT meetings were typically attended by specialist, principal or consultant pharmacists. Common contributions included: provision of pro-active advice/responding to queries; medicines optimisation; monitoring; income or compliance assurance; prescribing/deprescribing. Specialist pharmacists provided 80-100 outpatient clinic sessions across 17 sub-specialities through a mix of face-to-face and virtual appointments, advanced pharmacy technicians provided on-treatment and counselling clinics. Activities included: initiation, monitoring, adjustment and cessation of medicines; patient counselling and MDT referral. Medicines prescribed were typically high cost, complex and higher risk. Pharmacists prescribed and clinically verified homecare medicines and provided ongoing annual review of outpatient medicines, including prescribing/deprescribing. Teams described medicines reconciliation and counselling in ambulatory haematology settings, off-site units and infusion suites. The team organised, optimised and provided advice and counselling for patients requiring antimicrobial therapies at home. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians provided medicines information to patients, internal and external healthcare professionals. This study provides evidence of the broad scope of clinical pharmacy practice beyond the boundaries of traditional ward-based services in a tertiary teaching hospital. This study was limited to a single organisation, specific clinical pharmacy activities and outcomes of these services were not fully quantified. Formal collation of clinical pharmacy activities within “non-traditional” outpatient and ambulatory settings is limited because activity data collection forms in hospital pharmacy are typically validated in traditional ward-based pharmacy services. We recommend further studies to validate activity collection tools to benchmark the activities of clinical pharmacy professionals providing services in outpatient and ambulatory settings both within and between hospital Trusts. 1. Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Professional Standards for Hospital Pharmacy Practice, November 2022. Accessed via https://www.rpharms.com/recognition/setting-professional-standards/hospital-pharmacy-professional-standards May 2023 2. Snoswell CL, Draper MJ, Barras M. An evaluation of pharmacist activity in hospital outpatient clinics. J. Pharm. Pract. Res, 2021, 51(4), 328-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.1729","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad074.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospital clinical pharmacy practice in the UK has developed beyond traditional boundaries of ward-based inpatient services. Royal Pharmaceutical Society Hospital Pharmacy Standards recommend pharmacy team members are integrated into multidisciplinary teams across the organisation to ensure safe and appropriate medicines use whatever the setting1. Pharmacy professionals provide pharmaceutical care and specialist services in outpatient and ambulatory settings and through participation in multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. Within the outpatient setting, research typically focusses on single outpatient clinics within specific disciplines, little evidence describes the overall contribution to patient care across whole pharmacy services2. To describe the scope of clinical pharmacy services occurring beyond traditional ward-based services in a tertiary hospital; including quantification of outpatient clinics and MDT meetings provided by pharmacy professionals. The Deputy Chief Pharmacist invited clinical Principal Pharmacists to participate in semi-structured interviews exploring the scope of “non-traditional” services across the Trust during March 2023. Non-traditional services were defined as direct clinical care outside of ward-based inpatient clinical pharmacy services. Indirect clinical care activities such as guideline writing, drug expenditure and governance activities were excluded. Inpatient board rounds/ward rounds and any service not currently provided due to vacancy were excluded. Participants were asked to quantify services provided, advise who provided the services and to describe contributions provided by the pharmacy team. The study was deemed service evaluation and ethical approval waived. 100% invited pharmacists participated. Pharmacists attended and contributed to over 150 MDT meetings monthly across 24 sub-specialities; 80% were for outpatients. In tertiary/quaternary services, these frequently covered patients beyond local geography. MDT meetings were typically attended by specialist, principal or consultant pharmacists. Common contributions included: provision of pro-active advice/responding to queries; medicines optimisation; monitoring; income or compliance assurance; prescribing/deprescribing. Specialist pharmacists provided 80-100 outpatient clinic sessions across 17 sub-specialities through a mix of face-to-face and virtual appointments, advanced pharmacy technicians provided on-treatment and counselling clinics. Activities included: initiation, monitoring, adjustment and cessation of medicines; patient counselling and MDT referral. Medicines prescribed were typically high cost, complex and higher risk. Pharmacists prescribed and clinically verified homecare medicines and provided ongoing annual review of outpatient medicines, including prescribing/deprescribing. Teams described medicines reconciliation and counselling in ambulatory haematology settings, off-site units and infusion suites. The team organised, optimised and provided advice and counselling for patients requiring antimicrobial therapies at home. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians provided medicines information to patients, internal and external healthcare professionals. This study provides evidence of the broad scope of clinical pharmacy practice beyond the boundaries of traditional ward-based services in a tertiary teaching hospital. This study was limited to a single organisation, specific clinical pharmacy activities and outcomes of these services were not fully quantified. Formal collation of clinical pharmacy activities within “non-traditional” outpatient and ambulatory settings is limited because activity data collection forms in hospital pharmacy are typically validated in traditional ward-based pharmacy services. We recommend further studies to validate activity collection tools to benchmark the activities of clinical pharmacy professionals providing services in outpatient and ambulatory settings both within and between hospital Trusts. 1. Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Professional Standards for Hospital Pharmacy Practice, November 2022. Accessed via https://www.rpharms.com/recognition/setting-professional-standards/hospital-pharmacy-professional-standards May 2023 2. Snoswell CL, Draper MJ, Barras M. An evaluation of pharmacist activity in hospital outpatient clinics. J. Pharm. Pract. Res, 2021, 51(4), 328-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.1729
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越病房服务的界限--探索一家三级转诊教学医院的 "非传统 "临床药学实践范围
英国的医院临床药学实践已经超越了以病房为基础的住院服务的传统界限。英国皇家药学会《医院药学标准》建议将药学团队成员纳入整个组织的多学科团队,以确保在任何环境下都能安全、合理地使用药物1。药学专业人员通过参与多学科团队 (MDT) 会议,在门诊和非住院环境中提供药物护理和专科服务。在门诊环境中,研究通常集中在特定学科的单个门诊诊所,很少有证据说明整个药学服务对患者护理的整体贡献2。 为了描述一家三甲医院在传统病房服务之外的临床药学服务范围,包括药学专业人员提供的门诊和 MDT 会议的量化。 副总药剂师邀请临床首席药剂师参加半结构式访谈,探讨 2023 年 3 月期间信托基金内 "非传统 "服务的范围。非传统服务被定义为病房住院临床药学服务之外的直接临床护理。指南撰写、药品支出和管理活动等间接临床护理活动不包括在内。住院病人委员会查房/前去查房以及因职位空缺而未提供的任何服务均不包括在内。要求参与者对所提供的服务进行量化,告知提供服务的人员,并描述药学团队做出的贡献。这项研究被视为服务评估,因此免于伦理审批。 100%的受邀药剂师参与了研究。药剂师参加了 24 个亚专科每月举行的 150 多次 MDT 会议,并做出了贡献;其中 80% 是针对门诊患者的。在三级/四级服务机构中,这些会议经常覆盖当地以外的患者。MDT 会议通常由专科药剂师、首席药剂师或顾问药剂师参加。常见的贡献包括:提供积极主动的建议/回答询问;药品优化;监测;收入或合规性保证;处方/处方。专科药剂师通过面对面和虚拟预约相结合的方式,为 17 个亚专科提供 80-100 次门诊服务,高级药剂技师则提供治疗和咨询门诊服务。活动包括:开始使用、监测、调整和停药;病人咨询和多学科小组转诊。处方药物通常成本高、复杂且风险较高。药剂师开具家庭护理药品处方并进行临床验证,同时对门诊药品进行持续的年度审查,包括开具处方/处方。团队介绍了在非住院血液科、非住院部和输液室进行的药品协调和咨询。团队为需要在家接受抗菌治疗的患者组织、优化并提供建议和咨询。临床药剂师和药剂技师为患者、内部和外部医护人员提供药品信息。 这项研究证明,在一家三级教学医院中,临床药学实践的范围已经超越了传统病房服务的界限。本研究仅限于一家机构,具体的临床药学活动和服务成果并未完全量化。对 "非传统 "门诊和非住院环境中临床药学活动的正式整理是有限的,因为医院药学的活动数据收集表通常是在传统病房药学服务中验证的。我们建议开展进一步研究,验证活动收集工具,以便为医院信托基金内部和医院信托基金之间在门诊和非住院环境中提供服务的临床药学专业人员的活动制定基准。 1.英国皇家药学会,《医院药学实践专业标准》,2022 年 11 月。通过 https://www.rpharms.com/recognition/setting-professional-standards/hospital-pharmacy-professional-standards 2023 年 5 月访问 2.Snoswell CL, Draper MJ, Barras M. An evaluation of pharmacist activity in hospital outpatient clinics.J. Pharm.Pract.J. Pharm. Pract. Res, 2021, 51(4), 328-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.1729
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients from the perspective of pharmaceutical care: a scoping review. Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study of community pharmacists in the UK. Correction to: Lifeguard Pharmacy: the co-development of a new community pharmacy response service for people in danger from domestic abuse or suicidal ideation. Trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial antiepileptic drug treatment in older epileptic patients. Pandemic preparedness of Egyptian community pharmacists and potential facilitators to the successful implementation of a community pharmacy coronavirus disease 2019 referral service: a cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1